World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
14987
World Ranking
6807
National Ranking
455

Richard Y. Bourhis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Y. Bourhis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard Y. Bourhis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Y. Bourhis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Y. Bourhis is affiliated with the University of Quebec at Montreal in Canada. Their research career includes work on topics related to prejudice and discrimination, as indicated by their recent publication record.

The scientist has published in the journal Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. A notable recent paper is titled "A journey researching prejudice and discrimination." This paper was published in 2020 in the same journal.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Rana Sioufi and Pascal Tisserant.

Richard Y. Bourhis's work centers around themes connected to social psychology, particularly focusing on prejudice and discrimination, as reflected in their singular recent publication.

  • Frequent co-authors: Rana Sioufi, Pascal Tisserant
  • Frequent publication venues: Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
  • Recent papers: "A journey researching prejudice and discrimination." (2020, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne)

Best Publications

  • Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality An Empirical Study

    Rodrigue Landry;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Léna Céline Moïse;Stéphane Perreault;Sacha Senécal

  • Towards a Theory of Interpersonal Accommodation through Language: Some Canadian Data.

    Howard Giles;Donald M. Taylor;Richard Bourhis

  • Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations

    Itesh Sachdev;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Status differenttals and intergroup behaviour

    Itesh Sachdev;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Notes on the Construction of a 'Subjective Vitality Questionnaire' for Ethnolinguistic Groups.

    Richard Yvon Bourhis;Howard Giles;Doreen Rosenthal

  • The genesis of vitality theory: historical patterns and discoursal dimensions

    Jake Harwood;Howard Giles;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Majority Acculturation Orientations Toward “Valued” and “Devalued” Immigrants:

    Annie Montreuil;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Ethnocentrism, Social Identification, and Discrimination

    Stéphane Perreault;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Social categorization and power differentials in group relations

    Itesh Sachdev;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACCOMMODATING ONE’S STYLE OF SPEECH: A CROSS-NATIONAL INVESTIGATION

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Howard Giles;Wallace E. Lambert

  • Communication in the hospital setting: A survey of medical and everyday language use amongst patients, nurses and doctors

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Sharon Roth;Glenda MacQueen

  • Language as a determinant of Welsh identity

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Howard Giles;Henri Tajfel

  • Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Jacques Philippe Leyens

  • Discrimination in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Social Identity or Self-Interest?

    Andre Gagnon;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Vitality Perceptions and Language Attitudes: Some Canadian Data:

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Itesh Sachdev

  • Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes.

    Richard Y. Bourhis;Itesh Sachdev;André Gagnon

  • Minimal majorities and minorities

    Itesh Sachdev;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Acculturation orientations of competing host communities toward valued and devalued immigrants

    Annie Montreuil;Richard Y. Bourhis

  • Evaluative perceptions of patronizing speech addressed to elders.

    Ellen Bouchard Ryan;Richard Y. Bourhis;Uus Knops

  • Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations

    Richard y Bourhis;Shaha El-Geledi;Itesh Sachdev

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard Giles
Howard Giles University of California, Santa Barbara
Catherine E. Amiot
Catherine E. Amiot University of Quebec at Montreal
Jacques-Philippe Leyens
Jacques-Philippe Leyens Université Catholique de Louvain
Jake Harwood
Jake Harwood University of Arizona
Karen Phalet
Karen Phalet KU Leuven
Doreen Rosenthal
Doreen Rosenthal University of Melbourne
Donald M. Taylor
Donald M. Taylor McGill University
Wallace E. Lambert
Wallace E. Lambert McGill University
Anne Maass
Anne Maass University of Padua
Henri Tajfel
Henri Tajfel University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a range of career pathways, with one of the most popular being marriage and family therapy (MFT). Online psychology degrees can provide a flexible foundation for working professionals and students alike, offering the coursework needed to meet state requirements for licensure. Each state and city has its own education and certification demands, so it’s important to understand local guidelines when considering this career.

For example, if you are interested in learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tampa, you’ll need to complete a graduate program and fulfill Florida’s licensing criteria. Similarly, reviewing mft requirements in Toledo can help you understand Ohio’s unique pathways. People planning to practice in Arizona should pay attention to Tucson mft education requirements, which differ from other regions. Likewise, prospective therapists in Oklahoma can get guidance on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tulsa.

Online programs often align with these regional requirements, helping graduates prepare for licensure and future success in their chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Y. Bourhis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles