World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5953
World Ranking
10256
National Ranking
310

Andrea Bobbio publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Bobbio sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 143 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrea Bobbio D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Bobbio sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrea Bobbio is affiliated with the University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro in Italy. Their research primarily spans the field of Social Sciences, with focused contributions in subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Education, Social Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Information Systems.

The scientist has engaged extensively with topics related to Environmental Education and Sustainability, Environmental Sustainability in Business, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Software System Performance and Reliability, Educational and Social Studies, Cultural Differences and Values, and Social and Intergroup Psychology.

Among their recent publications, notable works include:

  • "Buying Organic Food Products: The Role of Trust in the Theory of Planned Behavior" (2020) published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Sustainable purchase intentions: The role of moral norm and social dominance orientation in the theory of planned behavior applied to the case of fair trade products" (2022) published in Sustainable Development
  • "Organizational Work-Home Culture and its Relations with the Work-Family Interface and Employees' Subjective Well-being" (2022) published in Applied Research in Quality of Life
  • "Felt or Thought: Distinct Mechanisms Underlying Exploitative Leadership and Abusive Supervision" (2023) published in Journal of Business Ethics
  • "A cyber warfare perspective on risks related to health IoT devices and contact tracing" (2022) published in Neural Computing and Applications

Their frequent co-authors have included:

  • Anna Maria Manganelli
  • Luigina Canova
  • Marco Gribaudo
  • Marco Scarpa
  • Armin Pircher Verdorfer

Andrea Bobbio has published multiple articles in various venues, with repeated contributions at Messanae Universitas Studiorum (University of Messina). Other publication venues include Frontiers in Psychology, Sustainable Development, Applied Research in Quality of Life, and Journal of Business Ethics.

Best Publications

  • Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks

    Andrea Bobbio;Luigi Portinale;Michele Minichino;Ester Ciancamerla

  • The effect of execution policies on the semantics and analysis of stochastic Petri nets

    M. Ajmone Marsan;G. Balbo;A. Bobbio;G. Chiola

  • Reliability and Availability Engineering: Modeling, Analysis, and Applications

    Kishor S. Trivedi;Andrea Bobbio;Jogesh Muppala

  • Radyban: A tool for reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees through conversion into dynamic Bayesian networks

    S. Montani;L. Portinale;A. Bobbio;D. Codetta-Raiteri

  • Matching Three Moments with Minimal Acyclic Phase Type Distributions

    A. Bobbio;A. Horváth;M. Telek

  • Petri nets in performance analysis : An introduction

    M. A. Marsan;A. Bobbio;S. Donatelli

  • Acyclic discrete phase type distributions: properties and a parameter estimation algorithm

    A. Bobbio;A. Horváth;M. Scarpa;M. Telek

  • PhFit: a general phase-type fitting tool

    A. Bobbio;A. Horvath;M. Telek

  • Probabilistic Algebraic Analysis of Fault Trees With Priority Dynamic Gates and Repeated Events

    G. Merle;J.-M. Roussel;J.-J. Lesage;A. Bobbio

  • On Petri Nets with Stochastic Timing

    Marco Ajmone Marsan;Gianfranco Balbo;Andrea Bobbio;Giovanni Chiola

  • A benchmark for ph estimation algorithms: results for acyclic-ph

    Andrea Bobbio;Miklós Telek

  • Parametric fault trees with dynamic gates and repair boxes

    A. Bobbio;D.C. Raiteri

  • RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN NON-MARKOVIAN STOCHASTIC PETRI NETS

    Andrea Bobbio;Antonio Puliafito;Miklós Telek;Kishor S. Trivedi

  • Fluid Stochastic Petri Nets Augmented with Flush-out Arcs: Modelling and Analysis

    M. Gribaudo;M. Sereno;A. Horváth;A. Bobbio

  • Fine grained software degradation models for optimal rejuvenation policies

    Andrea Bobbio;Matteo Sereno;Cosimo Anglano

  • System Modelling with Petri Nets

    Andrea Bobbio

  • Analysis of Large Scale Interacting Systems by Mean Field Method

    A. Bobbio;M. Gribaudo;M. Telek

  • The Design of a Unified Package for the Solution of Stochastic Petri Net Models

    Joanne Bechta Dugan;Andrea Bobbio;Gianfranco Ciardo;Kishor S. Trivedi

  • Markov regenerative SPN with non-overlapping activity cycles

    A. Bobbio;N. Telek

  • Parametric fault tree for the dependability analysis of redundant systems and its high-level Petri net semantics

    A. Bobbio;G. Franceschinis;R. Gaeta;L. Portinale

  • An Aggregation Technique for the Transient Analysis of Stiff Markov Chains

    Andrea Bobbio;S K Trivedi

Frequent Co-Authors

Kishor S. Trivedi
Kishor S. Trivedi Duke University
Stefania Montani
Stefania Montani University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Antonio Puliafito
Antonio Puliafito University of Messina
Jogesh K. Muppala
Jogesh K. Muppala Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Marco Ajmone Marsan
Marco Ajmone Marsan Polytechnic University of Turin
Gianfranco Ciardo
Gianfranco Ciardo Iowa State University
Reinhard German
Reinhard German University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Salvatore Distefano
Salvatore Distefano University of Messina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and fast-growing career options. For students who want to blend software and hardware expertise, pursuing an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering is a flexible choice that builds skills for sought-after industries.

Many career paths now begin with certifications that can be completed quickly and remotely. Targeting easy certifications that pay well allows students and professionals to boost their qualifications and earning potential without a long-term commitment.

Those seeking to advance even further might look into quick masters degrees online. These accelerated programs can be completed in as little as one year, making them a smart move for career progression without a lengthy break from work.

Looking for long-term value? Consider enrolling in graduate degrees that are worth it. These programs are strategically aligned with industry demand and can open doors to leadership roles in technology and business.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Bobbio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles