World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mariëlle Stoelinga

Mariëlle Stoelinga

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11212 10893 204 194 253 5891

Mariëlle Stoelinga publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mariëlle Stoelinga between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mariëlle Stoelinga published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 9.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 38 of the 288 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 18 publications
1998 2026

288 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mariëlle Stoelinga: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 5
2007 7
2008 6
2009 10
2010 6
2011 6
2012 10
2013 13
2014 15
2015 12
2016 16
2017 12
2018 18
2019 11
2020 10
2021 22
2022 18
2023 19
2024 16
2025 20
2026 18
Total 288
Download as CSV

Mariëlle Stoelinga publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariëlle Stoelinga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 252–261 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377 253
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Mariëlle Stoelinga D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariëlle Stoelinga sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 36
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mariëlle Stoelinga is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Their research spans several areas within computer science and engineering, with a specific focus on software reliability, formal verification, and security.

Their recent works include:

  • Sampling-Based Robust Control of Autonomous Systems with Non-Gaussian Noise, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Robust Control for Dynamical Systems with Non-Gaussian Noise via Formal Abstractions, 2023, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Efficient and Generic Algorithms for Quantitative Attack Tree Analysis, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • PrimaVera: Synergising Predictive Maintenance, 2020, Applied Sciences
  • A Case in Point: Verification and Testing of a EULYNX Interface, 2022, Formal Aspects of Computing

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Mariëlle Stoelinga include:

  • Milan Lopuhaä-Zwakenberg
  • Matthias Volk
  • Lisandro A. Jiménez-Roa
  • Nils Jansen
  • Carlos E. Budde

Stoelinga has published extensively across several venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • Formal Aspects of Computing

Two books published with Springer Science+Business Media detail parts of their research contribution:

  • Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 2021
  • A Journey from Process Algebra via Timed Automata to Model Learning, 2022

The primary fields of study include Computer Science and Engineering. Within these areas, their subfields of research focus on:

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications

The main topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Best Publications

  • Fault tree analysis

    Enno Ruijters;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Linear Parametric Model Checking of Timed Automata

    Thomas Hune;Judi Romijn;Mariëlle Stoelinga;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • Timed Interfaces

    Luca de Alfaro;Thomas A. Henzinger;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis Using Input/Output Interactive Markov Chains

    H. Boudali;P. Crouzen;M. Stoelinga

  • Resource Interfaces

    Unknown

  • A Rigorous, Compositional, and Extensible Framework for Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis

    Hichem Boudali;Pepijn Crouzen;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • The Element of Surprise in Timed Games

    Luca de Alfaro;Marco Faella;Marco Faella;Thomas A. Henzinger;Rupak Majumdar

  • A compositional semantics for dynamic fault trees in terms of interactive Markov chains

    Hichem Boudali;Pepijn Crouzen;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Model checking discounted temporal properties

    Luca de Alfaro;Marco Faella;Thomas A. Henzinger;Rupak Majumdar

  • Quantitative Security and Safety Analysis with Attack-Fault Trees

    Rajesh Kumar;Marielle Stoelinga

  • Linear and Branching System Metrics

    L. de Alfaro;M. Faella;M. Stoelinga

  • Alea jacta est : verification of probabilistic, real-time and parametric systems

    Mariëlle Ida Antoinette Stoelinga

  • Time-Dependent Analysis of Attacks

    Florian Arnold;Holger Hermanns;Reza Pulungan;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Linear and Branching Metrics for Quantitative Transition Systems

    Luca de Alfaro;Marco Faella;Mariëlle Ida Antoinette Stoelinga

  • Root Contention in IEEE 1394

    Mariëlle Stoelinga;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • How fast and fat is your probabilistic model checker? an experimental performance comparison

    David N. Jansen;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Marcel Oldenkamp;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • An Introduction to Probabilistic Automata.

    Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Quantitative attack tree analysis via priced timed automata

    Rajesh Kumar;Enno Jozef Johannes Ruijters;Mariëlle Ida Antoinette Stoelinga

  • Mechanical verification of the IEEE 1394a Root Contention Protocol using Uppaal2k

    David P.L. Simons;Mariëlle I.A. Stoelinga

  • Delayed Nondeterminism in Continuous-Time Markov Decision Processes

    Martin R. Neuhäußer;Mariëlle Stoelinga;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • The Recent Applications of Machine Learning in Rail Track Maintenance : A Survey

    Muhammad Chenariyan Nakhaee;Djoerd Hiemstra;Mariëlle Stoelinga;Martijn van Noort

  • Quantitative testing

    Henrik Bohnenkamp;Mariëlle Stoelinga

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaco van de Pol
Jaco van de Pol Aarhus University
Joost-Pieter Katoen
Joost-Pieter Katoen RWTH Aachen University
Arend Rensink
Arend Rensink University of Twente
Alessandro Abate
Alessandro Abate University of Oxford
Luca de Alfaro
Luca de Alfaro University of California, Santa Cruz
Frits W. Vaandrager
Frits W. Vaandrager Radboud University
Boudewijn R. Haverkort
Boudewijn R. Haverkort Tilburg University
Rupak Majumdar
Rupak Majumdar Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Thomas A. Henzinger
Thomas A. Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Tom Heskes
Tom Heskes Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science opens up a wide range of options, both in study format and future career opportunities. Today, many students are taking advantage of online colleges that accept low gpa, making quality education more accessible regardless of academic background.

Students interested in fast-tracking their education can consider a 2-year computer science degree online to enter the workforce quickly. Alternatively, interdisciplinary paths are also available. For example, technology frequently overlaps with other fields like environmental sciences. If you’re interested in these intersections, you may want to explore environmental science degree programs or even consider an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering focus.

Whether you’re seeking flexibility, affordability, or a specialized pathway, there are many online degree options that connect core computer science skills with emerging career fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mariëlle Stoelinga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles