World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mariëlle Stoelinga

Mariëlle Stoelinga

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5891
World Ranking
11212
National Ranking
204

Mariëlle Stoelinga publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariëlle Stoelinga sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mariëlle Stoelinga D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariëlle Stoelinga sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mariëlle Stoelinga is affiliated with the University of Twente in the Netherlands. Their research spans several areas within computer science and engineering, with a specific focus on software reliability, formal verification, and security.

Their recent works include:

  • Sampling-Based Robust Control of Autonomous Systems with Non-Gaussian Noise, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Robust Control for Dynamical Systems with Non-Gaussian Noise via Formal Abstractions, 2023, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Efficient and Generic Algorithms for Quantitative Attack Tree Analysis, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • PrimaVera: Synergising Predictive Maintenance, 2020, Applied Sciences
  • A Case in Point: Verification and Testing of a EULYNX Interface, 2022, Formal Aspects of Computing

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Mariëlle Stoelinga include:

  • Milan Lopuhaä-Zwakenberg
  • Matthias Volk
  • Lisandro A. Jiménez-Roa
  • Nils Jansen
  • Carlos E. Budde

Stoelinga has published extensively across several venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • Formal Aspects of Computing

Two books published with Springer Science+Business Media detail parts of their research contribution:

  • Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 2021
  • A Journey from Process Algebra via Timed Automata to Model Learning, 2022

The primary fields of study include Computer Science and Engineering. Within these areas, their subfields of research focus on:

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications

The main topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Best Publications

  • Fault tree analysis

    Enno Ruijters;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Linear Parametric Model Checking of Timed Automata

    Thomas Hune;Judi Romijn;Mariëlle Stoelinga;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • Timed Interfaces

    Luca de Alfaro;Thomas A. Henzinger;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis Using Input/Output Interactive Markov Chains

    H. Boudali;P. Crouzen;M. Stoelinga

  • Resource Interfaces

    Unknown

  • A Rigorous, Compositional, and Extensible Framework for Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis

    Hichem Boudali;Pepijn Crouzen;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • The Element of Surprise in Timed Games

    Luca de Alfaro;Marco Faella;Marco Faella;Thomas A. Henzinger;Rupak Majumdar

  • A compositional semantics for dynamic fault trees in terms of interactive Markov chains

    Hichem Boudali;Pepijn Crouzen;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Model checking discounted temporal properties

    Luca de Alfaro;Marco Faella;Thomas A. Henzinger;Rupak Majumdar

  • Quantitative Security and Safety Analysis with Attack-Fault Trees

    Rajesh Kumar;Marielle Stoelinga

  • Linear and Branching System Metrics

    L. de Alfaro;M. Faella;M. Stoelinga

  • Alea jacta est : verification of probabilistic, real-time and parametric systems

    Mariëlle Ida Antoinette Stoelinga

  • Time-Dependent Analysis of Attacks

    Florian Arnold;Holger Hermanns;Reza Pulungan;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Linear and Branching Metrics for Quantitative Transition Systems

    Luca de Alfaro;Marco Faella;Mariëlle Ida Antoinette Stoelinga

  • Root Contention in IEEE 1394

    Mariëlle Stoelinga;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • How fast and fat is your probabilistic model checker? an experimental performance comparison

    David N. Jansen;Joost-Pieter Katoen;Marcel Oldenkamp;Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • An Introduction to Probabilistic Automata.

    Mariëlle Stoelinga

  • Quantitative attack tree analysis via priced timed automata

    Rajesh Kumar;Enno Jozef Johannes Ruijters;Mariëlle Ida Antoinette Stoelinga

  • Mechanical verification of the IEEE 1394a Root Contention Protocol using Uppaal2k

    David P.L. Simons;Mariëlle I.A. Stoelinga

  • Delayed Nondeterminism in Continuous-Time Markov Decision Processes

    Martin R. Neuhäußer;Mariëlle Stoelinga;Joost-Pieter Katoen

  • The Recent Applications of Machine Learning in Rail Track Maintenance : A Survey

    Muhammad Chenariyan Nakhaee;Djoerd Hiemstra;Mariëlle Stoelinga;Martijn van Noort

  • Quantitative testing

    Henrik Bohnenkamp;Mariëlle Stoelinga

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaco van de Pol
Jaco van de Pol Aarhus University
Joost-Pieter Katoen
Joost-Pieter Katoen RWTH Aachen University
Arend Rensink
Arend Rensink University of Twente
Alessandro Abate
Alessandro Abate University of Oxford
Luca de Alfaro
Luca de Alfaro University of California, Santa Cruz
Frits W. Vaandrager
Frits W. Vaandrager Radboud University
Boudewijn R. Haverkort
Boudewijn R. Haverkort Tilburg University
Rupak Majumdar
Rupak Majumdar Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Thomas A. Henzinger
Thomas A. Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Tom Heskes
Tom Heskes Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science opens up a wide range of options, both in study format and future career opportunities. Today, many students are taking advantage of online colleges that accept low gpa, making quality education more accessible regardless of academic background.

Students interested in fast-tracking their education can consider a 2-year computer science degree online to enter the workforce quickly. Alternatively, interdisciplinary paths are also available. For example, technology frequently overlaps with other fields like environmental sciences. If you’re interested in these intersections, you may want to explore environmental science degree programs or even consider an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering focus.

Whether you’re seeking flexibility, affordability, or a specialized pathway, there are many online degree options that connect core computer science skills with emerging career fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mariëlle Stoelinga

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles