World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
3765
World Ranking
13247
National Ranking
344

Nicolas Markey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Markey sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nicolas Markey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Markey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicolas Markey is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their research focuses primarily on computer science, with a particular emphasis on computational theory and mathematics.

Within their field of study, they have contributed significantly to several subfields, including:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Software
  • Economics and Econometrics

Their work encompasses a range of topics central to theoretical computer science and related applications, such as:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Semigroups and Automata Theory
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Real-Time Systems Scheduling

Nicolas Markey has published extensively, including notable recent papers such as:

  • "Diagnosing timed automata using timed markings," 2021, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • "Language Preservation Problems in Parametric Timed Automata," 2020, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • "Games on Graphs: From Logic and Automata to Algorithms," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Reasoning about Quality and Fuzziness of Strategic Behaviors," 2023, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
  • "Control strategies for off-line testing of timed systems," 2022, Formal Methods in System Design

Their collaborative efforts involve frequent co-authorship with several researchers, including:

  • Thierry Jéron
  • Ocan Sankur
  • David Mentré
  • Nathalie Bertrand
  • L. Henry

Publication venues frequently chosen by Nicolas Markey highlight their engagement with both peer-reviewed journals and scientific communication platforms. These include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Best Publications

  • Temporal logic with forgettable past

    F. Laroussinie;N. Markey;P. Schnoebelen

  • Infinite Runs in Weighted Timed Automata with Energy Constraints

    Patricia Bouyer;Uli Fahrenberg;Kim G. Larsen;Nicolas Markey

  • Improved undecidability results on weighted timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Thomas Brihaye;Nicolas Markey

  • Model checking a path

    Nicolas Markey;Nicolas Markey;Philippe Schnoebelen

  • Model checking timed automata with one or two clocks

    F. Laroussinie;N. Markey;Ph. Schnoebelen

  • ATL with Strategy Contexts and Bounded Memory

    Thomas Brihaye;Arnaud Costa;François Laroussinie;Nicolas Markey

  • On the expressiveness of TPTL and MTL

    Patricia Bouyer;Fabrice Chevalier;Nicolas Markey

  • On the Expressiveness and Complexity of ATL

    François Laroussinie;Nicolas Markey;Ghassan Oreiby

  • Robust model-checking of linear-time properties in timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Nicolas Markey;Pierre-Alain Reynier

  • Robustness and Implementability of Timed Automata

    Martin De Wulf;Laurent Doyen;Nicolas N. Markey;Jean-François Raskin

  • Robust safety of timed automata

    Martin Wulf;Laurent Doyen;Nicolas Markey;Jean-François Raskin

  • Model Checking CTL+ and FCTL is Hard

    François Laroussinie;Nicolas Markey;Ph. Schnoebelen

  • Quantitative analysis of real-time systems using priced timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Uli Fahrenberg;Kim G. Larsen;Nicolas Markey

  • Past is for free: on the complexity of verifying linear temporal properties with past

    Nicolas Markey

  • ATL with Strategy Contexts: Expressiveness and Model Checking

    Arnaud Da Costa;François Laroussinie;Nicolas Markey

  • On the expressiveness of TPTL and MTL

    Patricia Bouyer;Fabrice Chevalier;Nicolas Markey

  • The Cost of Punctuality

    P. Bouyer;N. Markey;J. Ouaknine;J. Worrell

  • Pure nash equilibria in concurrent deterministic games

    Patricia P. Bouyer;Romain Brenguier;Nicolas N. Markey;Michael Ummels

  • On Expressiveness and Complexity in Real-Time Model Checking

    Patricia Bouyer;Nicolas Markey;Joël Ouaknine;James Worrell

  • Timed automata with observers under energy constraints

    Patricia Bouyer;Uli Fahrenberg;Kim G. Larsen;Nicolas Markey

  • Efficient timed model checking for discrete-time systems

    F. Laroussinie;N. Markey;Ph. Schnoebelen

Frequent Co-Authors

Patricia Bouyer
Patricia Bouyer University of Paris-Saclay
Kim Guldstrand Larsen
Kim Guldstrand Larsen Aalborg University
James Worrell
James Worrell University of Oxford
Joël Ouaknine
Joël Ouaknine Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Jean-François Raskin
Jean-François Raskin Université Libre de Bruxelles
Orna Kupferman
Orna Kupferman Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Laurent Doyen
Laurent Doyen École Normale Supérieure
Stavros Tripakis
Stavros Tripakis Northeastern University
Antoine Girard
Antoine Girard University of Paris-Saclay
Alexandre David
Alexandre David Aalborg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a range of related online degrees and professional fields. Many students choose to explore interdisciplinary options such as pursuing online physics degrees, which blend computer science with problem-solving and analytical skills.

For those interested in data-driven technology, enrolling in a data science degree is a popular route. This equips graduates for high-demand roles in analytics, machine learning, and big data industries.

Another promising field is electrical engineering. The best online electrical engineering programs USA allow students to specialize in areas like electronics, robotics, or network engineering, complementing computer science education with a strong technical foundation.

If you’re looking for quicker career advancement, consider easy certifications to get that can boost your resume. Tech certifications are a practical way to show employers your skills and potentially secure higher-paying positions in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolas Markey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles