What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Surgery
- Cancer
His primary areas of study are Surgery, Internal medicine, Carcinoma, Survival rate and Hepatectomy.
David M. Nagorney combines subjects such as Metastasis and Lymph node with his study of Surgery.
His research integrates issues of Gastroenterology and Oncology in his study of Internal medicine.
His Carcinoma study combines topics in areas such as Gallbladder and Surgical reduction.
His work deals with themes such as Radiation therapy, Anemia and Anastomosis, which intersect with Survival rate.
His studies in Hepatectomy integrate themes in fields like Lymphadenectomy, Hepatic Cyst, Cause of death, Survival analysis and Adjuvant therapy.
His most cited work include:
- The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. (1050 citations)
- Improved Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Hepatic Resection and Improved Chemotherapy (893 citations)
- Diagnosis and Management of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (808 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Surgery, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Hepatectomy and General surgery.
In general Surgery study, his work on Perioperative, Retrospective cohort study, Resection and Survival rate often relates to the realm of In patient, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His Internal medicine study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Oncology.
His Gastroenterology research incorporates themes from Stage, Disease and Adenocarcinoma.
His research in Hepatectomy intersects with topics in Cancer and Survival analysis.
David M. Nagorney has included themes like Metastasis and Chemotherapy in his Colorectal cancer study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Surgery (50.10%)
- Internal medicine (32.36%)
- Gastroenterology (19.62%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Internal medicine (32.36%)
- Surgery (50.10%)
- Oncology (11.27%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Internal medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Colorectal cancer and Gastroenterology are his primary areas of study.
His Internal medicine study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Resection.
His Surgery research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Myelofibrosis, Pancreatic cancer and Splenectomy.
The concepts of his Oncology study are interwoven with issues in Neoadjuvant therapy, Propensity score matching, Retrospective cohort study and Intention-to-treat analysis.
His Colorectal cancer study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Survival rate, Primary cancer and Confidence interval.
His Gastroenterology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Adjuvant chemotherapy, Human cancer and Malignancy.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy (296 citations)
- Pan-Cancer Analysis of lncRNA Regulation Supports Their Targeting of Cancer Genes in Each Tumor Context (125 citations)
- Pan-cancer Alterations of the MYC Oncogene and Its Proximal Network across the Cancer Genome Atlas (124 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Cancer
- Surgery
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Internal medicine, Oncology, Cancer research, Perioperative and Pancreatectomy.
His study in Oncology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Neoadjuvant therapy, Retrospective cohort study, Metastasectomy, Colorectal cancer and Adenocarcinoma.
His studies in Cancer research integrate themes in fields like Oncogene and Chromatin, Transcription factor, Gene, microRNA.
His Perioperative research is classified as research in Surgery.
His Surgery study incorporates themes from Lung injury and Splenectomy.
His Pancreatectomy study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Sarcopenia, Urology and Predictive factor.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
