World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
162
Citations
98440
World Ranking
715
National Ranking
405

Yuman Fong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yuman Fong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,045 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Yuman Fong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yuman Fong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 162 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Yuman Fong is affiliated with the City Of Hope National Medical Center in the United States. Their academic contributions span predominantly within Medicine, with a focused expertise in Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, and Hepatology.

The research topics covered by Yuman Fong include:

  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Yuman Fong has frequently published in several scholarly journals. Notable venues include:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • JAMA Surgery
  • Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • HPB
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Single-cell transcriptome analysis of tumor and stromal compartments of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma primary tumors and metastatic lesions, 2020, Genome Medicine
  • Effective combination immunotherapy using oncolytic viruses to deliver CAR targets to solid tumors, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Choices of Therapeutic Strategies for Colorectal Liver Metastases Among Expert Liver Surgeons, 2020, Annals of Surgery
  • Association of Living in Urban Food Deserts with Mortality from Breast and Colorectal Cancer, 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • International experts consensus guidelines on robotic liver resection in 2023, World Journal of Gastroenterology

Yuman Fong collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Laleh G. Melstrom
  • Yanghee Woo
  • Mustafa Raoof
  • Shyambabu Chaurasiya
  • Susanne G. Warner

The scientist has been recognized with awards, such as the designation Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Clinical Score for Predicting Recurrence After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of 1001 Consecutive Cases

    Yuman Fong;Joseph Fortner;Ruth L. Sun;Murray F. Brennan

  • Anti-cachectin/TNF monoclonal antibodies prevent septic shock during lethal bacteraemia

    Kevin J. Tracey;Kevin J. Tracey;Yuman Fong;David G. Hesse;Kirk R. Manogue

  • Improvement in Perioperative Outcome After Hepatic Resection: Analysis of 1,803 Consecutive Cases Over the Past Decade

    William R. Jarnagin;Mithat Gonen;Yuman Fong;Ronald P. DeMatteo

  • The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008.

    Joseph F. Buell;Daniel Cherqui;David A. Geller;Nicholas O'Rourke

  • Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

    William R. Jarnagin;Yuman Fong;Ronald P. DeMatteo;Mithat Gonen

  • Liver resection for colorectal metastases.

    Y Fong;A M Cohen;J G Fortner;W E Enker

  • Actual 10-Year Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Defines Cure

    James S. Tomlinson;William R. Jarnagin;Ronald P. DeMatteo;Yuman Fong

  • Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

    Nancy Kemeny;Ying Huang;Alfred M. Cohen;Weiji Shi

  • An analysis of 412 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma at a Western center.

    Yuman Fong;Ruth L. Sun;William Jarnagin;Leslie H. Blumgart

  • Cachectin/tumor necrosis factor induces cachexia, anemia, and inflammation.

    K J Tracey;H Wei;K R Manogue;Y Fong

  • Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection.

    Itaru Endo;Mithat Gonen;Adam C. Yopp;Kimberly M. Dalal

  • Antibodies to cachectin/tumor necrosis factor reduce interleukin 1 beta and interleukin 6 appearance during lethal bacteremia.

    Y Fong;K J Tracey;L L Moldawer;D G Hesse

  • Cytokine appearance in human endotoxemia and primate bacteremia.

    Hesse Dg;Tracey Kj;Fong Y;Manogue Kr

  • Lymph node metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma in adults. Analysis of data from a prospective database of 1772 sarcoma patients.

    Yuman Fong;Daniel G. Coit;James M. Woodruff;Murray F. Brennan

  • Influence of Transfusions on Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome in Patients Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases

    David A. Kooby;Jennifer Stockman;Leah Ben-Porat;Mithat Gonen

  • Surgery of the liver and biliary tract

    L. H. Blumgart;Y. Fong

  • Hepatic neuroendocrine metastases: does intervention alter outcomes?

    Ronald S Chamberlain;David Canes;Karen T Brown;Leonard Saltz

  • Cachectin/tumor necrosis factor induces lethal shock and stress hormone responses in the dog

    K J Tracey;S F Lowry;T J Fahey rd;J D Albert

  • Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system.

    Edmund C. Burke;William R. Jarnagin;Steven N. Hochwald;Peter W. T. Pisters

  • Perioperative outcomes of major hepatic resections under low central venous pressure anesthesia: blood loss, blood transfusion, and the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction.

    Jose A Melendez;Vittoria Arslan;Mary E Fischer;David Wuest

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. Jarnagin
William R. Jarnagin Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ronald P. DeMatteo
Ronald P. DeMatteo University of Pennsylvania
Michael I. D’Angelica
Michael I. D’Angelica Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter J. Allen
Peter J. Allen Duke University
Mithat Gonen
Mithat Gonen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Leslie H. Blumgart
Leslie H. Blumgart Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Nancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Murray F. Brennan
Murray F. Brennan Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
T. Peter Kingham
T. Peter Kingham Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David S. Klimstra
David S. Klimstra Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can provide valuable opportunities for those interested in health care, but not ready to commit to an MD. Options such as a health care administration online degree offer students a quicker pathway to leadership roles in hospitals and clinics, often with more flexibility and lower costs.

Pursuing an advanced credential like an MHA can open further doors. However, it's important to consider the mha degree cost, which can vary widely depending on the institution, mode, and length of study.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest practice level, the cost-effectiveness and accessibility of the cheapest dnp program should be weighed carefully against factors like program reputation and graduation rates.

Pharmacists can now advance their careers with online options too, but prospective students must understand online pharmacy school cost considerations, as well as licensure requirements.

Choosing the right degree and pathway involves balancing career goals with financial planning—these resources can help you make an informed decision.

Best Scientists Citing Yuman Fong

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles