World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 165 630 576 360 322 940 109774

Mithat Gonen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mithat Gonen between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mithat Gonen published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 50.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 238 publications in 2023. 133 of the 1,305 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150 200
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 238. Peak 238 publications in 2023. 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 35 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 39 publications 2008: 42 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 48 publications 2011: 62 publications 2012: 49 publications 2013: 64 publications 2014: 60 publications 2015: 52 publications 2016: 52 publications 2017: 59 publications 2018: 44 publications 2019: 50 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 62 publications 2022: 55 publications 2023: 238 publications 2024: 60 publications 2025: 73 publications
2000 2025

1,305 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mithat Gonen: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 3
2001 8
2002 12
2003 23
2004 21
2005 35
2006 25
2007 39
2008 42
2009 32
2010 48
2011 62
2012 49
2013 64
2014 60
2015 52
2016 52
2017 59
2018 44
2019 50
2020 37
2021 62
2022 55
2023 238
2024 60
2025 73
Total 1,305
Download as CSV

Mithat Gonen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mithat Gonen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 921–940 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 940 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116 940
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mithat Gonen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mithat Gonen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 164–165 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 165 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53 165
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Mithat Gonen is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a focused output of 636 publications. Gonen's work spans several key subfields, including Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Hepatology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics of their scientific contributions involve areas of cancer research, specifically:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Among recent notable publications authored or co-authored by Gonen are:

  • PD-1 Blockade in Mismatch Repair-Deficient, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer, 2022, published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Personalized RNA neoantigen vaccines stimulate T cells in pancreatic cancer, 2023, published in Nature
  • Genomic characterization of metastatic patterns from prospective clinical sequencing of 25,000 patients, 2022, published in Cell
  • A Phase I Trial of Regional Mesothelin-Targeted CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Disease, in Combination with the Anti-PD-1 Agent Pembrolizumab, 2021, published in Cancer Discovery
  • ILC2s amplify PD-1 blockade by activating tissue-specific cancer immunity, 2020, published in Nature

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gonen include:

  • William R. Jarnagin
  • T. Peter Kingham
  • Jeffrey A. Drebin
  • Alice C. Wei
  • Kevin C. Soares

The most common venues for Gonen's research publications are:

  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • HPB
  • Annals of Surgery
  • Clinical Cancer Research

In recognition of professional achievements, Mithat Gonen was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Andrew J. Vickers;Nancy R. Cook;Thomas Gerds

  • Efficacy and Toxicity Management of 19-28z CAR T Cell Therapy in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    Marco L. Davila;Isabelle Riviere;Xiuyan Wang;Shirley Bartido

  • Long-Term Follow-up of CD19 CAR Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    Jae H. Park;Isabelle Rivière;Mithat Gonen;Xiuyan Wang

  • Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye

    Vinod P Balachandran;Mithat Gonen;J Joshua Smith;Ronald P DeMatteo

  • Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia

    Jay P. Patel;Mithat Gönen;Maria E. Figueroa;Hugo Fernandez

  • Improvement in Perioperative Outcome After Hepatic Resection: Analysis of 1,803 Consecutive Cases Over the Past Decade

    William R. Jarnagin;Mithat Gonen;Yuman Fong;Ronald P. DeMatteo

  • Targeting a CAR to the TRAC locus with CRISPR/Cas9 enhances tumour rejection

    Justin Eyquem;Jorge Mansilla-Soto;Theodoros Giavridis;Sjoukje J. C. van der Stegen

  • Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

    William R. Jarnagin;Yuman Fong;Ronald P. DeMatteo;Mithat Gonen

  • Actual 10-Year Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Defines Cure

    James S. Tomlinson;William R. Jarnagin;Ronald P. DeMatteo;Yuman Fong

  • Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer.

    Vinod P. Balachandran;Marta Łuksza;Julia N. Zhao;Vladimir Makarov

  • Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers

    Andrew J Vickers;Angel M Cronin;Elena B Elkin;Mithat Gonen

  • The JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway is required for growth of CD44+CD24– stem cell–like breast cancer cells in human tumors

    Lauren L.C. Marotta;Vanessa Almendro;Vanessa Almendro;Andriy Marusyk;Michail Shipitsin

  • Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: rising frequency, improved survival, and determinants of outcome after resection.

    Itaru Endo;Mithat Gonen;Adam C. Yopp;Kimberly M. Dalal

  • Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis

    Lambert Busque;Jay P Patel;Maria E Figueroa;Aparna Vasanthakumar

  • Clinical and Biological Correlates of Neurotoxicity Associated with CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

    Bianca D. Santomasso;Jae H. Park;Darin Salloum;Isabelle Riviere

  • Estimating risk of recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine remnant ablation: using response to therapy variables to modify the initial risk estimates predicted by the new American Thyroid Association staging system.

    R. Michael Tuttle;Hernan Tala;Jatin Shah;Rebecca Leboeuf

  • Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe

    Evan Phillips;Oula Penate-Medina;Pat B. Zanzonico;Richard D. Carvajal

  • Patterns of Initial Recurrence in Completely Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma

    Michael D'Angelica;Mithat Gonen;Murray F. Brennan;Alan D. Turnbull

  • Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression

    Mithat Gönen;Glenn Heller

  • Influence of Transfusions on Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome in Patients Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases

    David A. Kooby;Jennifer Stockman;Leah Ben-Porat;Mithat Gonen

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. Jarnagin
William R. Jarnagin Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael I. D’Angelica
Michael I. D’Angelica Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Peter J. Allen
Peter J. Allen Duke University
Ronald P. DeMatteo
Ronald P. DeMatteo University of Pennsylvania
Yuman Fong
Yuman Fong City Of Hope National Medical Center
T. Peter Kingham
T. Peter Kingham Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Murray F. Brennan
Murray F. Brennan Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Nancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Steven M. Larson
Steven M. Larson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
David S. Klimstra
David S. Klimstra Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your medical career in the USA can start with choosing the right online degree pathway. For those aiming to reach the highest levels of nursing practice quickly, accelerated dnp programs online provide a fast-track option to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. These programs blend flexibility with rigorous training, allowing you to balance work and study.

If cost is a significant factor, explore affordable dnp programs that deliver quality education without the hefty price tag. Affordable options are vital for minimizing student debt while still expanding your professional qualifications.

Beginners or those switching careers can consider online lpn programs. These programs allow students to enter the healthcare field efficiently and pave the way for further advancement down the line.

For those focused on mental health, psych nurse practitioner programs offer training to specialize in psychiatric and mental health care, responding to a growing need in the U.S. healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Mithat Gonen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles