World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
21007
World Ranking
5097
National Ranking
2800

David K. Sherman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David K. Sherman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David K. Sherman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David K. Sherman is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with notable contributions in subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Applied Psychology, and Communication.

The main topics covered in Sherman's research include:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Their recent publication record features several papers including:

  • "Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries" (2022) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Elite influence on public attitudes about climate policy" (2021) published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • "Social norms explain prioritization of climate policy" (2022) published in Climatic Change
  • "Self-affirmation theory in educational contexts" (2021) published in Journal of Social Issues
  • "The Challenges of Military Veterans in Their Transition to the Workplace: A Call for Integrating Basic and Applied Psychological Science" (2020) published in Perspectives on Psychological Science

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Sherman include:

  • Leaf Van Boven
  • Kimin Eom
  • Heejung S. Kim
  • Alexandra Flores
  • Gabriela M. Jiga-Boy

Sherman's work is regularly published in several academic venues, notably:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Journal of Social Issues
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • The Psychology of Self‐defense: Self‐Affirmation Theory

    David K. Sherman;Geoffrey L. Cohen

  • The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention.

    Geoffrey L. Cohen;David K. Sherman

  • Culture and social support.

    Heejung S. Kim;David K. Sherman;Shelley E. Taylor

  • Culture and social support: who seeks it and why?

    Shelley E. Taylor;David K. Sherman;Heejung S. Kim;Johanna Jarcho

  • Do Messages about Health Risks Threaten the Self? Increasing the Acceptance of Threatening Health Messages Via Self-Affirmation

    David A. K. Sherman;Leif D. Nelson;Claude M. Steele

  • Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification

    Michael A. Hogg;David K. Sherman;Joel Dierselhuis;Angela T. Maitner

  • Affirmation of Personal Values Buffers Neuroendocrine and Psychological Stress Responses

    J. David Creswell;William T. Welch;Shelley E. Taylor;David K. Sherman

  • Accepting Threatening Information: Self–Affirmation and the Reduction of Defensive Biases

    David K. Sherman;Geoffrey L. Cohen

  • Cultural Differences in the Impact of Social Support on Psychological and Biological Stress Responses

    Shelley E. Taylor;William T. Welch;Heejung S. Kim;David K. Sherman

  • "Express yourself": culture and the effect of self-expression on choice.

    Heejung S. Kim;David K. Sherman

  • Deflecting the trajectory and changing the narrative: how self-affirmation affects academic performance and motivation under identity threat.

    David K. Sherman;Kimberly A. Hartson;Kevin R. Binning;Valerie Purdie-Vaughns

  • Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles?

    Shelley E. Taylor;Jennifer S. Lerner;David K. Sherman;Rebecca M. Sage

  • Portrait of the Self-Enhancer: Well Adjusted and Well Liked or Maladjusted and Friendless?

    Shelley E. Taylor;Jennifer S. Lerner;David K. Sherman;Rebecca M. Sage

  • Pursuit of Comfort and Pursuit of Harmony: Culture, Relationships, and Social Support Seeking:

    Heejung S. Kim;David K. Sherman;Deborah Ko;Shelley E. Taylor

  • Culture, distress, and oxytocin receptor polymorphism (OXTR) interact to influence emotional support seeking

    Heejung S. Kim;David K. Sherman;Joni Y. Sasaki;Jun Xu

  • Dispositional motivations and message framing: A test of the congruency hypothesis in college students

    Traci Mann;David Sherman;John Updegraff

  • Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation.

    Geoffrey L. Cohen;David K. Sherman;Anthony Bastardi;Lillian Hsu

  • Oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is related to psychological resources

    Shimon Saphire-Bernstein;Baldwin M. Way;Heejung S. Kim;David K. Sherman

  • Affirmed Yet Unaware: Exploring the Role of Awareness in the Process of Self-Affirmation

    David K. Sherman;Geoffrey L. Cohen;Leif D. Nelson;A. David Nussbaum

  • “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: Visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior

    Cameron Brick;David K. Sherman;Heejung S. Kim

  • Approach/Avoidance Motivation, Message Framing, and Health Behavior: Understanding the Congruency Effect.

    David K. Sherman;Traci Mann;John A. Updegraff

Frequent Co-Authors

Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles
John A. Updegraff
John A. Updegraff Kent State University
Geoffrey L. Cohen
Geoffrey L. Cohen Stanford University
Leaf Van Boven
Leaf Van Boven University of Colorado Boulder
Traci Mann
Traci Mann University of Minnesota
Eunkook M. Suh
Eunkook M. Suh Yonsei University
Leif D. Nelson
Leif D. Nelson University of California, Berkeley
J. David Creswell
J. David Creswell Carnegie Mellon University
Ayse K. Uskul
Ayse K. Uskul University of Sussex
Charles M. Judd
Charles M. Judd University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of career paths, from clinical therapy to substance abuse counseling. Online degrees make these paths more accessible, allowing students to earn qualifications while managing other life responsibilities.

When aiming to become a therapist, it’s essential to understand the specific educational and licensing requirements by state. For example, those interested in working as therapists in North Carolina can learn more about Winston Salem licensed therapist education requirements. Requirements may include a graduate degree, supervised practice, and passing licensing exams.

Substance abuse counseling is another common career pathway. Each city or state may set its own standards, as outlined for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Albuquerque and Anaheim substance abuse counselors education requirements. Typically, these positions require specialized coursework, hands-on training, and certification exams.

If you are considering relocating, it’s helpful to compare qualifications in different locations, such as substance abuse counselor requirements in Anchorage. Researching these pathways helps you plan your education and career journey confidently, wherever you hope to practice.

Best Scientists Citing David K. Sherman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles