World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2224 2026 246 230 173 33715

A. David Milner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by A. David Milner between 1968 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. A. David Milner published across 56 years, from 1968 to 2023, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2004. 3 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2004. 1968: 2 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 4 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 2 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications
1968 2023

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
A. David Milner: publications per year, 1968 to 2023
Year Publications
1968 2
1969 1
1970 4
1971 0
1972 2
1973 2
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 4
1978 3
1979 2
1980 0
1981 1
1982 5
1983 4
1984 3
1985 5
1986 3
1987 4
1988 0
1989 3
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 3
1994 6
1995 6
1996 2
1997 3
1998 7
1999 4
2000 2
2001 4
2002 5
2003 3
2004 14
2005 4
2006 13
2007 1
2008 5
2009 9
2010 9
2011 2
2012 3
2013 3
2014 3
2015 4
2016 1
2017 2
2018 3
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 3
Total 181
Download as CSV

A. David Milner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. David Milner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 173 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 173
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

A. David Milner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. David Milner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1992 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

A. David Milner is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a specialization in cognitive neuroscience. The scientist's work addresses several key topics including visual perception and processing mechanisms, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, motor control and adaptation, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and face recognition and perception.

The recent published papers authored or coauthored by A. David Milner include:

  • "Shape perception does not require dorsal stream processing," 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Melvyn A. Goodale: A visual neuroscientist in action," 2023, Neuropsychologia
  • "Patients with dorsal-stream lesions can perceive global shape," 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Frequent collaborators include Melvyn A. Goodale, with whom Milner has coauthored multiple papers.

The scientist's publications are commonly found in these venues:

  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Neuropsychologia

The research spans a concentrated set of topics:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Face Recognition and Perception

In recognition of contributions to science, A. David Milner was made a Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1992.

Best Publications

  • Separate visual pathways for perception and action.

    Melvyn A. Goodale;A.David Milner

  • The visual brain in action

    A. David Milner;Melvyn A. Goodale

  • A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them

    M A Goodale;A D Milner;L S Jakobson;David Peter Matthew Carey

  • Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'.

    A. D. Milner;D. I. Perrett;R. S. Johnston;P. J. Benson

  • Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision

    Melvyn A. Goodale;A. David Milner

  • Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study.

    Thomas W. James;Jody Culham;G. Keith Humphrey;A. David Milner

  • Chapter 28 Visual pathways to perception and action

    A. David Milner;Melvyn A. Goodale

  • Visual analysis of body movements by neurones in the temporal cortex of the macaque monkey: a preliminary report.

    D.I. Perrett;P.A.J. Smith;A.J. Mistlin;A.J. Chitty

  • The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect

    Hans-Otto Karnath;A. David Milner;Giuseppe Vallar

  • Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action.

    Melvyn A. Goodale;David A. Westwood;A. David Milner

  • Line bisection errors in visual neglect: misguided action or size distortion?

    A.D. Milner;M. Harvey;R.C. Roberts;S.V. Forster

  • The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area

    Jennifer K E Steeves;Jody C Culham;Bradley C Duchaine;Cristiana Cavina Pratesi

  • Grasping the past. delay can improve visuomotor performance.

    A.D Milner;H.C Dijkerman;L Pisella;R.D McIntosh

  • An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task

    M. Harvey;A.D. Milner;R.C. Roberts

  • A paradoxical improvement of misreaching in optic ataxia: new evidence for two separate neural systems for visual localization

    A. D. Milner;Y. Paulignan;H. C. Dijkerman;F. Michel

  • Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia

    David Peter Matthew Carey;M Harvey;A D Milner

  • An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS

    Amanda Ellison;Igor Schindler;Lara L. Pattison;A. David Milner

  • Modulation of visual event-related potentials by spatial and non-spatial visual selective attention.

    M.D. Rugg;A.D. Milner;C.R. Lines;R. Phalp

  • Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia.

    A.D. Milner;H.C. Dijkerman;R.D. McIntosh;Y. Rossetti

  • Separate Channels for Processing Form, Texture, and Color: Evidence from fMRI Adaptation and Visual Object Agnosia

    C. Cavina-Pratesi;R.W. Kentridge;C.A. Heywood;A.D. Milner

  • The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic

    M. A. Goodale;L. S. Jakobson;A. D. Milner;D. I. Perrett

  • How do the two visual streams interact with each other?

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Melvyn A. Goodale
Melvyn A. Goodale University of Western Ontario
Robert D. McIntosh
Robert D. McIntosh University of Edinburgh
H. Chris Dijkerman
H. Chris Dijkerman Utrecht University
Jody C. Culham
Jody C. Culham University of Western Ontario
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford
Yves Rossetti
Yves Rossetti Lyon Neuroscience Research Center
Monika Harvey
Monika Harvey University of Glasgow
Michael D. Rugg
Michael D. Rugg The University of Texas at Dallas
Mark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams University of Leeds
Robert W. Kentridge
Robert W. Kentridge Durham University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens up a range of fulfilling career paths, with counseling being one of the most accessible and in-demand options. Prospective students often seek efficient educational routes, especially those balancing work or family commitments. Online psychology degrees are increasingly popular, offering flexibility and the potential to accelerate studies compared to traditional programs.

Each state has specific requirements for becoming a licensed counselor. For example, discovering the fastest way to become a counselor in Rhode Island can help streamline your academic planning. Similar programs exist in other states, such as South Carolina accelerated counseling programs and guidance on the quickest path to becoming a counselor in South Dakota.

Students in other regions might explore the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Tennessee for more tailored information. Researching state-specific programs and licensure regulations helps future professionals create a clear, personalized roadmap for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing A. David Milner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles