World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4424
World Ranking
9616
National Ranking
954

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
4627
World Ranking
9054
National Ranking
667

Monika Harvey publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monika Harvey sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 163 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Monika Harvey D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monika Harvey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Monika Harvey is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and related subfields. The primary domains of study include neuroscience broadly, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and anesthesiology and pain medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics such as neural and behavioral psychology studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, mind wandering and attention, neural dynamics and brain function, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, as well as pain management and treatment.

Monika Harvey's recent publications include:

  • Low pre-stimulus EEG alpha power amplifies visual awareness but not visual sensitivity, 2021, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Parietal alpha tACS shows inconsistent effects on visuospatial attention, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Effects of Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Alpha-Band on Visual Perception Depend on Deviation From Alpha-Peak Frequency: Faster Relative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alpha-Pace Improves Performance, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation in Stroke patients (NIBS): A prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) feasibility trial using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke hemispatial neglect, 2020, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • Social perception drives eye-movement related brain activity: Evidence from pro- and anti-saccades to faces, 2020, Neuropsychologia

Frequent collaborators include Gregor Thut, Gemma Learmonth, Simon Hanzal, Andra Coldea, and Christopher S. Y. Benwell. These co-authors have contributed to several joint projects and publications.

Regarding publication venues, Monika Harvey has contributed to the following frequently:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS ONE
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • Neuropsychologia
  • European Journal of Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Line bisection errors in visual neglect: misguided action or size distortion?

    A.D. Milner;M. Harvey;R.C. Roberts;S.V. Forster

  • Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search

    Iain D Gilchrist;Monika Harvey

  • An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task

    M. Harvey;A.D. Milner;R.C. Roberts

  • Visuomotor sensitivity for shape and orientation in a patient with visual form agnosia

    David Peter Matthew Carey;M Harvey;A D Milner

  • Imported chicken meat as a potential source of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the UK

    R. E. Warren;V. M. Ensor;P. O'Neill;V. Butler

  • Are the perceptual biases found in chimeric face processing reflected in eye-movement patterns?

    S Butler;Iain D Gilchrist;DM Burt;DI Perrett

  • Distortion of size perception in visuospatial neglect

    A.David Milner;Monika Harvey

  • Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search

    Iain D. Gilchrist;Monika Harvey

  • Non-linear effects of transcranial direct current stimulation as a function of individual baseline performance: Evidence from biparietal tDCS influence on lateralized attention bias.

    Christopher S.Y. Benwell;Gemma Learmonth;Carlo Miniussi;Monika Harvey

  • The implications of state-dependent tDCS effects in aging: Behavioural response is determined by baseline performance.

    Gemma Learmonth;Gregor Thut;Christopher S.Y. Benwell;Monika Harvey

  • Balint's Patient

    M Harvey;AD Milner

  • The coordination of bimanual prehension movements in a centrally deafferented patient.

    G M Jackson;Jackson;M Husain;M Harvey

  • On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length

    Christopher S.Y. Benwell;Monika Harvey;Gregor Thut

  • A rightward shift in the visuospatial attention vector with healthy aging

    Christopher S. Y. Benwell;Gregor Thut;Ashley Grant;Monika Harvey

  • Spatial attention: Differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes $

    Christopher S.Y. Benwell;Gregor Thut;Gemma Learmonth;Monika Harvey

  • Differential effects of line length on bisection judgements in hemispatial neglect

    Monika Harvey;A D Milner;R C Roberts

  • Low pre-stimulus EEG alpha power amplifies visual awareness but not visual sensitivity.

    Christopher S. Y. Benwell;Andra Coldea;Monika Harvey;Gregor Thut

  • Psychic paralysis of gaze, optic ataxia, and spatial disorder of attention

    Rudolph Bálint;Monika Harvey

  • Trial-by-trial co-variation of pre-stimulus EEG alpha power and visuospatial bias reflects a mixture of stochastic and deterministic effects.

    Christopher S. Y. Benwell;Christian Keitel;Monika Harvey;Joachim Gross

  • Spatial bias in visually-guided reaching and bisection following right cerebral stroke.

    M. Harvey;A.D. Milner;R.C. Roberts

  • Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.

    Christopher S.Y. Benwell;Monika Harvey;Stephanie Gardner;Gregor Thut

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregor Thut
Gregor Thut Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Iain D. Gilchrist
Iain D. Gilchrist University of Bristol
Keith W. Muir
Keith W. Muir University of Glasgow
Stephen R. Jackson
Stephen R. Jackson University of Nottingham
Masud Husain
Masud Husain University of Oxford
Georg Kerkhoff
Georg Kerkhoff Saarland University
A. David Milner
A. David Milner Durham University
Joachim Gross
Joachim Gross University of Münster
Peter M. Hawkey
Peter M. Hawkey University of Birmingham
Ian H. Robertson
Ian H. Robertson Trinity College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study neuroscience can open doors to diverse career options in healthcare, education, and research. Aspiring professionals looking for flexibility may want to consider related online programs that fit specific career goals or financial needs.

For those seeking quick entry into the workforce or skill upgrades, online certificate programs that pay well can be a practical choice. Such certifications can complement a neuroscience background by focusing on areas like data analysis or mental health support.

Budget is a key consideration for many students. If affordability matters, you might explore the cheapest easiest online degree options, which are cost-effective while still providing a solid educational foundation.

Neuroscience majors interested in mental health careers could benefit from an affordable graduate program. Consider options such as the cheapest online master's in social work or bcba masters programs for a path into therapy, counseling, or behavioral analysis.

Online degrees and certificate programs provide accessible, flexible ways to build a career related to neuroscience—making advanced education more achievable for students everywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Monika Harvey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles