World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16090 15140 8095 7490 391 25209

Cameron G. McDougall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cameron G. McDougall between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cameron G. McDougall published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 11.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 87 publications in 2015. 1 of the 404 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 87. Peak 87 publications in 2015. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 87 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1991 2025

404 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cameron G. McDougall: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 5
1996 1
1997 0
1998 5
1999 4
2000 0
2001 1
2002 6
2003 9
2004 12
2005 11
2006 18
2007 11
2008 10
2009 11
2010 19
2011 16
2012 23
2013 25
2014 32
2015 87
2016 26
2017 17
2018 23
2019 4
2020 6
2021 14
2022 1
2023 3
2024 0
2025 1
Total 404
Download as CSV

Cameron G. McDougall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cameron G. McDougall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 391 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 391
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Cameron G. McDougall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cameron G. McDougall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cameron G. McDougall is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on neurology. The subfields of study linked to their work include neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, rheumatology, and oncology.

The main topics explored in their research cover a range of critical areas such as intracranial aneurysms, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, acute ischemic stroke management, vascular malformations diagnosis and treatment, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, and neurosurgical procedures and complications.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Justin M. Caplan, Judy Huang, Rafael J. Tamargo, Christopher M. Jackson, and James Feghali. Their studies have appeared in several notable publication venues, including Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Review, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, World Neurosurgery, and Stroke.

Among recent publications featuring Cameron G. McDougall as an author are the following:

  • Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial, 2021, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Monocyte-based inflammatory indices predict outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2021, Neurosurgical Review
  • Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2020, Stroke
  • PD-1+ Monocytes Mediate Cerebral Vasospasm Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, 2020, Neurosurgery
  • Application of unruptured aneurysm scoring systems to a cohort of ruptured aneurysms: are we underestimating rupture risk?, 2021, Neurosurgical Review

Best Publications

  • Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

    Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;Colin P. Derdeyn;Tanya N. Turan

  • Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

    Tibor Becske;David F. Kallmes;Isil Saatci;Cameron G. McDougall

  • Aggressive Medical Treatment With or Without Stenting in High-Risk Patients With Intracranial Artery Stenosis (Sammpris): The Final Results of a Randomised Trial

    Colin P. Derdeyn;Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;David Fiorella

  • The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial

    Cameron G. McDougall;Robert F. Spetzler;Joseph M. Zabramski;Shahram Partovi

  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Michael D Hill;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K Menon;Raul G Nogueira

  • International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study

    David F. Kallmes;R. Hanel;D. Lopes;E. Boccardi

  • US Multicenter Experience With the Wingspan Stent System for the Treatment of Intracranial Atheromatous Disease Periprocedural Results

    David Fiorella;Elad I. Levy;Aquilla S. Turk;Felipe C. Albuquerque

  • The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results

    Robert F. Spetzler;Cameron G. McDougall;Joseph M. Zabramski;Felipe C. Albuquerque

  • Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

    David Fiorella;Felipe C Albuquerque;Patrick Han;Cameron G McDougall

  • Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial

    Tibor Becske;Waleed Brinjikji;Matthew B. Potts;David F. Kallmes

  • Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3-6-mo) follow-up.

    David Fiorella;Felipe C. Albuquerque;Vivek R. Deshmukh;Cameron G. McDougall

  • Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Michael D Hill;Renee H Martin;David Mikulis;John H Wong

  • The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: A multidisciplinary consensus

    Nima Etminan;Robert D. Brown;Kerim Beseoglu;Seppo Juvela

  • The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 3-year results.

    Robert F. Spetzler;Cameron G. McDougall;Felipe C. Albuquerque;Joseph M. Zabramski

  • Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management.

    Elad I. Levy;Elad I. Levy;Aquilla S. Turk;Felipe C. Albuquerque;David B. Niemann

  • Aspiration Thrombectomy after Intravenous Alteplase Versus Intravenous Alteplase Alone

    J Mocco;Osama O. Zaidat;Rüdiger von Kummer;Albert J. Yoo

  • Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Combined Intrathrombus rtPA and Intravenous Heparin

    James L. Frey;Gerard J. Muro;Cameron G. McDougall;Bruce L. Dean

  • Endovascular reconstruction with the Neuroform stent as monotherapy for the treatment of uncoilable intradural pseudoaneurysms.

    David Fiorella;Felipe C. Albuquerque;Vivek R. Deshmukh;Henry H. Woo

  • Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms using electrolytically detachable coils

    Cameron G. McDougall;Van V. Halbach;Christopher F. Dowd;Randall T. Higashida

  • Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms

    D Fiorella;P Lylyk;I Szikora;M E Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Spetzler
Robert F. Spetzler St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
David Fiorella
David Fiorella Stony Brook University
Elad I. Levy
Elad I. Levy University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Randall T. Higashida
Randall T. Higashida University of California, San Francisco
Colin P. Derdeyn
Colin P. Derdeyn University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
L. Nelson Hopkins
L. Nelson Hopkins University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Christopher F. Dowd
Christopher F. Dowd University of California, San Francisco
David F. Kallmes
David F. Kallmes Mayo Clinic
Adnan H. Siddiqui
Adnan H. Siddiqui University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Van V. Halbach
Van V. Halbach University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of online health and nursing degrees, each offering unique pathways and flexible options. Many students look for the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs, which allow individuals with a non-nursing background or existing degree to quickly transition into a nursing career. These programs are designed for those who want to start working in healthcare as soon as possible.

For registered nurses looking to advance, rn to bsn online programs are widely available and help nurses build upon their existing experience with added qualifications, often at a flexible pace. Similarly, those seeking the highest levels of clinical leadership in nursing can benefit from the cheapest dnp programs online, making advanced practice more accessible and affordable.

If you’re considering switching careers, direct entry online msn programs for non-nurses offer a fast-track route into advanced nursing roles. Each of these online degree options brings flexible learning and diverse career outcomes, making a medical profession more reachable for a variety of backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Cameron G. McDougall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles