World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
25209
World Ranking
16091
National Ranking
8096

Cameron G. McDougall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cameron G. McDougall sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 391 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Cameron G. McDougall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cameron G. McDougall sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cameron G. McDougall is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on neurology. The subfields of study linked to their work include neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, rheumatology, and oncology.

The main topics explored in their research cover a range of critical areas such as intracranial aneurysms, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, acute ischemic stroke management, vascular malformations diagnosis and treatment, aortic aneurysm repair treatments, and neurosurgical procedures and complications.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Justin M. Caplan, Judy Huang, Rafael J. Tamargo, Christopher M. Jackson, and James Feghali. Their studies have appeared in several notable publication venues, including Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Review, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, World Neurosurgery, and Stroke.

Among recent publications featuring Cameron G. McDougall as an author are the following:

  • Safety and efficacy results of the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) stent system in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: US pivotal trial, 2021, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Monocyte-based inflammatory indices predict outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2021, Neurosurgical Review
  • Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2020, Stroke
  • PD-1+ Monocytes Mediate Cerebral Vasospasm Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, 2020, Neurosurgery
  • Application of unruptured aneurysm scoring systems to a cohort of ruptured aneurysms: are we underestimating rupture risk?, 2021, Neurosurgical Review

Best Publications

  • Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis

    Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;Colin P. Derdeyn;Tanya N. Turan

  • Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

    Tibor Becske;David F. Kallmes;Isil Saatci;Cameron G. McDougall

  • Aggressive Medical Treatment With or Without Stenting in High-Risk Patients With Intracranial Artery Stenosis (Sammpris): The Final Results of a Randomised Trial

    Colin P. Derdeyn;Marc I. Chimowitz;Michael J. Lynn;David Fiorella

  • The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial

    Cameron G. McDougall;Robert F. Spetzler;Joseph M. Zabramski;Shahram Partovi

  • Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Michael D Hill;Mayank Goyal;Bijoy K Menon;Raul G Nogueira

  • International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study

    David F. Kallmes;R. Hanel;D. Lopes;E. Boccardi

  • US Multicenter Experience With the Wingspan Stent System for the Treatment of Intracranial Atheromatous Disease Periprocedural Results

    David Fiorella;Elad I. Levy;Aquilla S. Turk;Felipe C. Albuquerque

  • The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results

    Robert F. Spetzler;Cameron G. McDougall;Joseph M. Zabramski;Felipe C. Albuquerque

  • Preliminary experience using the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

    David Fiorella;Felipe C Albuquerque;Patrick Han;Cameron G McDougall

  • Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial

    Tibor Becske;Waleed Brinjikji;Matthew B. Potts;David F. Kallmes

  • Usefulness of the Neuroform stent for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: results at initial (3-6-mo) follow-up.

    David Fiorella;Felipe C. Albuquerque;Vivek R. Deshmukh;Cameron G. McDougall

  • Safety and efficacy of NA-1 in patients with iatrogenic stroke after endovascular aneurysm repair (ENACT): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Michael D Hill;Renee H Martin;David Mikulis;John H Wong

  • The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: A multidisciplinary consensus

    Nima Etminan;Robert D. Brown;Kerim Beseoglu;Seppo Juvela

  • The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 3-year results.

    Robert F. Spetzler;Cameron G. McDougall;Felipe C. Albuquerque;Joseph M. Zabramski

  • Wingspan in-stent restenosis and thrombosis: incidence, clinical presentation, and management.

    Elad I. Levy;Elad I. Levy;Aquilla S. Turk;Felipe C. Albuquerque;David B. Niemann

  • Aspiration Thrombectomy after Intravenous Alteplase Versus Intravenous Alteplase Alone

    J Mocco;Osama O. Zaidat;Rüdiger von Kummer;Albert J. Yoo

  • Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Combined Intrathrombus rtPA and Intravenous Heparin

    James L. Frey;Gerard J. Muro;Cameron G. McDougall;Bruce L. Dean

  • Endovascular reconstruction with the Neuroform stent as monotherapy for the treatment of uncoilable intradural pseudoaneurysms.

    David Fiorella;Felipe C. Albuquerque;Vivek R. Deshmukh;Henry H. Woo

  • Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms using electrolytically detachable coils

    Cameron G. McDougall;Van V. Halbach;Christopher F. Dowd;Randall T. Higashida

  • Curative cerebrovascular reconstruction with the Pipeline embolization device: the emergence of definitive endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms

    D Fiorella;P Lylyk;I Szikora;M E Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Spetzler
Robert F. Spetzler St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
David Fiorella
David Fiorella Stony Brook University
Elad I. Levy
Elad I. Levy University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Randall T. Higashida
Randall T. Higashida University of California, San Francisco
Colin P. Derdeyn
Colin P. Derdeyn University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
L. Nelson Hopkins
L. Nelson Hopkins University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Christopher F. Dowd
Christopher F. Dowd University of California, San Francisco
David F. Kallmes
David F. Kallmes Mayo Clinic
Adnan H. Siddiqui
Adnan H. Siddiqui University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Van V. Halbach
Van V. Halbach University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of online health and nursing degrees, each offering unique pathways and flexible options. Many students look for the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs, which allow individuals with a non-nursing background or existing degree to quickly transition into a nursing career. These programs are designed for those who want to start working in healthcare as soon as possible.

For registered nurses looking to advance, rn to bsn online programs are widely available and help nurses build upon their existing experience with added qualifications, often at a flexible pace. Similarly, those seeking the highest levels of clinical leadership in nursing can benefit from the cheapest dnp programs online, making advanced practice more accessible and affordable.

If you’re considering switching careers, direct entry online msn programs for non-nurses offer a fast-track route into advanced nursing roles. Each of these online degree options brings flexible learning and diverse career outcomes, making a medical profession more reachable for a variety of backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Cameron G. McDougall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles