World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7491 6985 4044 3674 88 8497

Alicia E. Meuret publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alicia E. Meuret between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alicia E. Meuret published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2022. 7 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2022. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
2001 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alicia E. Meuret: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 4
2007 4
2008 7
2009 6
2010 9
2011 2
2012 7
2013 9
2014 2
2015 4
2016 3
2017 4
2018 4
2019 2
2020 2
2021 4
2022 28
2023 3
2024 5
2025 2
Total 118
Download as CSV

Alicia E. Meuret publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicia E. Meuret sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 88 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 88
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alicia E. Meuret D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alicia E. Meuret sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alicia E. Meuret is affiliated with Southern Methodist University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience. Meuret's work also touches on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine as well as Applied Psychology.

The scientist's research topics include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Additional areas of study encompass mental health research topics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, COVID-19 and mental health, mindfulness and compassion interventions, respiratory and cough-related research, and digital mental health interventions.

Meuret has published research in a variety of venues, with multiple articles appearing in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Behavior Therapy. Other publication outlets include Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Nature Reviews Psychology, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Frequent collaborators include Thomas Ritz, David Rosenfield, Michelle G. Craske, Natalie C. Tunnell, and Andres D. Roque.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • "Positive affect treatment targets reward sensitivity: A randomized controlled trial." (2023, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology)
  • "Anxiety Disorders and Medical Comorbidity: Treatment Implications" (2020, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology)
  • "Positive affect and reward processing in the treatment of depression, anxiety and trauma" (2024, Nature Reviews Psychology)
  • "Fear and Coping in Students during the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Combined Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study" (2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • "An Examination of the RDoC Negative Valence Systems Domain Constructs and the Self-Reports Unit of Analysis" (2022, Behavior Therapy)

Best Publications

  • Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap

    Unknown

  • Augmentation of Exposure Therapy With D-Cycloserine for Social Anxiety Disorder

    Stefan G. Hofmann;Alicia E. Meuret;Jasper A. J. Smits;Naomi M. Simon

  • Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria

    Amanda G. Loerinc;Alicia E. Meuret;Michael P. Twohig;David Rosenfield

  • Positive affect treatment for depression and anxiety: A randomized clinical trial for a core feature of anhedonia.

    Michelle G Craske;Alicia E Meuret;Thomas Ritz;Michael Treanor

  • Treatment for Anhedonia: A Neuroscience Driven Approach.

    Michelle G. Craske;Alicia E. Meuret;Thomas Ritz;Michael Treanor

  • Electrophysiological evidence of attentional biases in social anxiety disorder

    E. M. Mueller;S. G. Hofmann;D. L. Santesso;A. E. Meuret

  • Respiratory and cognitive mediators of treatment change in panic disorder: evidence for intervention specificity.

    Alicia E. Meuret;David Rosenfield;Anke Seidel;Lavanya Bhaskara

  • Preliminary evidence for cognitive mediation during cognitive-behavioral therapy of panic disorder.

    Stefan G. Hofmann;Alicia E. Meuret;David Rosenfield;Michael K. Suvak

  • Feedback of end-tidal pCO2 as a therapeutic approach for panic disorder

    Alicia E. Meuret;Frank H. Wilhelm;Thomas Ritz;Walton T. Roth;Walton T. Roth

  • Sudden gains during therapy of social phobia.

    Stefan G. Hofmann;Stefan M. Schulz;Alicia E. Meuret;David A. Moscovitch

  • Electrophysiological correlates of spatial orienting towards angry faces: A source localization study

    Diane L. Santesso;Alicia E. Meuret;Stefan G. Hofmann;Erik M. Mueller

  • d-Cycloserine as an Augmentation Strategy With Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder

    Stefan G. Hofmann;Jasper A.J. Smits;David Rosenfield;Naomi Simon

  • The Role of Trauma Symptoms in Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

    Noelle B. Smith;Chrystyna D. Kouros;Alicia E. Meuret

  • D-cycloserine enhancement of exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder depends on the success of exposure sessions.

    Jasper A.J. Smits;David Rosenfield;Michael W. Otto;Luana Marques

  • Panic attack symptom dimensions and their relationship to illness characteristics in panic disorder.

    Alicia E. Meuret;Kamila S. White;Thomas Ritz;Walton T. Roth

  • Hyperventilation in Panic Disorder and Asthma: Empirical Evidence and Clinical Strategies

    Alicia E. Meuret;Thomas Ritz

  • Respiratory biofeedback-assisted therapy in panic disorder

    Alicia E. Meuret;Frank H. Wilhelm;Walton T. Roth

  • Do unexpected panic attacks occur spontaneously

    Alicia E. Meuret;David Rosenfield;Frank H. Wilhelm;Enlu Zhou

  • Psychophysiological Effects of Breathing Instructions for Stress Management

    Ansgar Conrad;Anett Müller;Sigrun Doberenz;Sunyoung Kim

  • Psychosocial factors and behavioral medicine interventions in asthma.

    Thomas Ritz;Alicia E. Meuret;Ana F. Trueba;Anja Fritzsche

  • Breathing training for treating panic disorder. Useful intervention or impediment

    Alicia E. Meuret;Frank H. Wilhelm;Thomas Ritz;Walton T. Roth

  • Voluntary Hyperventilation in the Treatment of Panic Disorder--Functions of Hyperventilation, Their Implications for Breathing Training, and Recommendations for Standardization

    Alicia E. Meuret;Thomas Ritz;Frank H. Wilhelm;Walton T. Roth

Frequent Co-Authors

Walton T. Roth
Walton T. Roth Stanford University
David Rosenfield
David Rosenfield Southern Methodist University
Frank H. Wilhelm
Frank H. Wilhelm University of Salzburg
Stefan G. Hofmann
Stefan G. Hofmann Philipp University of Marburg
Michelle G. Craske
Michelle G. Craske University of California, Los Angeles
Jasper A. J. Smits
Jasper A. J. Smits The University of Texas at Austin
Naomi M. Simon
Naomi M. Simon New York University
Luana Marques
Luana Marques Massachusetts General Hospital
Mark H. Pollack
Mark H. Pollack Rush University Medical Center
Michael P. Twohig
Michael P. Twohig Utah State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a variety of academic and professional opportunities. Flexible online programs are available across the U.S., catering to different educational backgrounds and career goals. If you’re looking to start with a bachelor’s, options like the easiest online psychology bachelor’s in Florida and easiest online psychology bachelor’s degrees in Houston can provide accessible entry points. These programs are designed to accommodate working adults and those seeking flexible learning schedules.

For those considering advanced study, graduate options such as the California easiest psychology master’s degree online offer specialized curriculum and opportunities to focus on clinical practice, research, or counseling. Furthermore, students aspiring to reach the highest levels of education can explore the easiest online doctorate in psychology degree programs in America. These paths can lead to careers in academia, therapy, human resources, and organizational psychology.

When choosing an online degree, consider accreditation, program flexibility, and your long-term career objectives. The pathway you select can make a significant difference in the skills you acquire and the professional roles you can pursue.

Best Scientists Citing Alicia E. Meuret

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles