World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
13847
World Ranking
3975
National Ranking
138

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
12596
World Ranking
4011
National Ranking
215

Richard M. Stuetz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Stuetz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 269 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard M. Stuetz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Stuetz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. Stuetz is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a significant concentration in areas such as Process Chemistry and Technology, Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's work covers multiple topical areas, including:

  • Odor and Emission Control Technologies
  • Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

Richard M. Stuetz has published extensively in several recurring venues, notably:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Journal of Water Process Engineering
  • Chemosphere

Some of their recent papers include:

  • The role of microbial ecology in improving the performance of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge (2022), Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Critical review of adsorption and biodegradation mechanisms for removal of biogenic taste and odour compounds in granular and biological activated carbon contactors (2023), Journal of Water Process Engineering
  • Performance of wet scrubbers to remove VOCs from rubber emissions (2022), Journal of Environmental Management
  • Identification of volatile sulfur odorants emitted from ageing wastewater biosolids (2021), Chemosphere
  • Odour concentrations prediction based on odorants concentrations from biosolid emissions (2022), Environmental Research

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ruth M. Fisher
  • Ademir A. Prata
  • Nhat Le-Minh
  • Bojan Tamburic
  • Nicholas D. Crosbie

Best Publications

  • Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review.

    R.K. Henderson;A. Baker;A. Baker;K.R. Murphy;K.R. Murphy;A. Hambly

  • Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes

    N. Le-Minh;S.J. Khan;J.E. Drewes;J.E. Drewes;R.M. Stuetz

  • Organic Matter Fluorescence in Municipal Water Recycling Schemes: Toward a Unified PARAFAC Model

    Kathleen R. Murphy;Adam Hambly;Sachin Singh;Rita K. Henderson

  • Odour measurements for sewage treatment works

    P. Gostelow;S.A. Parsons;R.M. Stuetz

  • Developments in odour control and waste gas treatment biotechnology: a review

    Joanna E Burgess;Simon A Parsons;Richard M Stuetz

  • Grey water characterisation and its impact on the selection and operation of technologies for urban reuse

    B Jefferson;A. Palmer;P. Jeffrey;R. Stuetz

  • On‐line monitoring of wastewater quality: a review

    Wilfrid Bourgeois;Joanna E Burgess;Richard M Stuetz

  • Odor Assessment and Management in Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Review

    Raquel Lebrero;Lynne Bouchy;Richard Stuetz;Raúl Muñoz

  • Monitoring techniques for odour abatement assessment

    Raul Muñoz;Eric C. Sivret;Gavin Parcsi;R. Lebrero

  • Characterisation of polymeric fouling in membrane bioreactors and the effect of different filtration modes

    Uli Metzger;Pierre Le-Clech;Richard M. Stuetz;Fritz H. Frimmel

  • Effects of relaxation and backwashing conditions on fouling in membrane bioreactor

    Jinling Wu;Pierre Le-Clech;Richard M. Stuetz;Anthony. G. Fane

  • The use of sensor arrays for environmental monitoring: interests and limitations

    Wilfrid Bourgeois;Anne-Claude Romain;Jacques Nicolas;Richard M. Stuetz

  • Odours in Wastewater Treatment - Measurement, Modelling and Control

    Richard Stuetz;Franz-Bernd Frechen

  • Assessment of odours from sewage treatment works by an electronic nose, H2S analysis and olfactometry

    R.M. Stuetz;R.A. Fenner;G. Engin

  • The Fate and Removal of Triclosan during Wastewater Treatment

    A. Thompson;P. Griffin;R. Stuetz;E. Cartmell

  • Evaluation of effluent organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration treatment using advanced organic characterisation techniques

    Rita K. Henderson;Nashida Subhi;Alice Antony;Stuart J. Khan

  • The multidimensional causal factors of 'wet litter' in chicken-meat production.

    Mark W. Dunlop;Mark W. Dunlop;Mark W. Dunlop;Amy F. Moss;Peter J. Groves;Stuart J. Wilkinson

  • The impact of malodour on communities: a review of assessment techniques.

    James Hayes;Richard Stevenson;Richard Stuetz

  • Chemical contaminants in feedlot wastes: concentrations, effects and attenuation.

    S.J. Khan;D.J. Roser;C.M. Davies;G.M. Peters

  • A review of monitoring technologies for real-time management of cyanobacteria: Recent advances and future direction

    Arash Zamyadi;Florence Choo;Gayle Newcombe;Richard Stuetz

  • Removal of trace organic chemical contaminants by a membrane bioreactor.

    T. Trinh;B. van den Akker;R. M. Stuetz;Heather Coleman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart J. Khan
Stuart J. Khan University of Sydney
Pierre Le-Clech
Pierre Le-Clech University of New South Wales
Vicki Chen
Vicki Chen University of Queensland
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology
Andy Baker
Andy Baker University of New South Wales
Bruce Jefferson
Bruce Jefferson Cranfield University
Jörg E. Drewes
Jörg E. Drewes Technical University of Munich
Gregory Peters
Gregory Peters Chalmers University of Technology
Gayle Newcombe
Gayle Newcombe South Australian Water Corporation
Richard J. Stevenson
Richard J. Stevenson Macquarie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in Engineering and Technology opens a world of flexibility and opportunity. For those with specialized interests, an urban planning online degree can lead to impactful careers shaping cities and communities. Many institutions now offer accelerated programs, such as a 6 month masters degree, allowing students to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner.

If your goal is a quick return on investment, consider certificate programs that pay well. These programs are designed for in-demand skills and can lead to lucrative jobs in technology and engineering fields. Online learning also supports diverse student needs—there are customized college programs for moms seeking to balance family and study.

With so many online degrees and career pathways available, students can find flexible, affordable options aligned with their personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Stuetz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles