World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
65
Citations
15242
World Ranking
2203
National Ranking
89

Stuart J. Khan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart J. Khan sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 228 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stuart J. Khan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart J. Khan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Stuart J. Khan is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research primarily lies within the field of Environmental Science, with significant contributions to related subfields including Water Science and Technology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Infectious Diseases, and Biomedical Engineering.

Their work encompasses a range of topics in environmental and water-related sciences. Notable main topics of research include:

  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
  • Wastewater Treatment and Reuse

Among Stuart J. Khan's recent papers are:

  • "Minimizing errors in RT-PCR detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for wastewater surveillance," 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "An Outdoor Aging Study to Investigate the Release of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) from Functional Textiles," 2022, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Scientists' warning on extreme wildfire risks to water supply," 2021, Hydrological Processes
  • "Occurrence, fate, and remediation for per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in sewage sludge: A comprehensive review," 2024, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • "Surface modification of nanofiltration membranes to improve the removal of organic micropollutants: Linking membrane characteristics to solute transmission," 2021, Water Research

Stuart J. Khan works often alongside frequent co-authors including:

  • James A. McDonald
  • Guido Carvajal
  • Samendra P. Sherchan
  • Kefeng Zhang
  • Ana Deletić

The scientist frequently publishes in several journals known for environmental and water science research. These venues include:

  • Water Research
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials

Best Publications

  • Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: a review.

    R.K. Henderson;A. Baker;A. Baker;K.R. Murphy;K.R. Murphy;A. Hambly

  • Fate of antibiotics during municipal water recycling treatment processes

    N. Le-Minh;S.J. Khan;J.E. Drewes;J.E. Drewes;R.M. Stuetz

  • Organic Matter Fluorescence in Municipal Water Recycling Schemes: Toward a Unified PARAFAC Model

    Kathleen R. Murphy;Adam Hambly;Sachin Singh;Rita K. Henderson

  • Removal of trace organics by MBR treatment: the role of molecular properties

    Nichanan Tadkaew;Faisal I. Hai;James A. McDonald;Stuart J. Khan

  • The role of membrane processes in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse

    T. Wintgens;T. Melin;Andrea Schäfer;S. Khan

  • Combining MBR and NF/RO membrane filtration for the removal of trace organics in indirect potable water reuse applications

    Abdulhakeem Ali Alturki;Nichanan Tadkaew;James A. McDonald;Stuart J. Khan

  • Sorption of emerging trace organic compounds onto wastewater sludge solids.

    John Stevens-Garmon;Jörg E. Drewes;Stuart J. Khan;James A. McDonald

  • Modelling of pharmaceutical residues in Australian sewage by quantities of use and fugacity calculations.

    Stuart J. Khan;Jerry E. Ongerth

  • Extreme Weather Events: Should Drinking Water Quality Management Systems Adapt to Changing Risk Profiles?

    Stuart J. Khan;Daniel Deere;Frederic D.L. Leusch;Andrew Humpage

  • Minimizing errors in RT-PCR detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for wastewater surveillance

    Warish Ahmed;Stuart L. Simpson;Paul M. Bertsch;Kyle Bibby

  • Performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) system: flux stability and removal of trace organics.

    Abdulhakeem Alturki;James McDonald;Stuart J. Khan;Faisal I. Hai

  • Removal of trace organic contaminants by the forward osmosis process

    Abdulhakeem Alturki;James McDonald;Stuart Khan;William Price

  • Removal of trace organics by anaerobic membrane bioreactors.

    Victor M. Monsalvo;James A. McDonald;Stuart J. Khan;Pierre Le-Clech

  • Effect of mixed liquor pH on the removal of trace organic contaminants in a membrane bioreactor.

    Nichanan Tadkaew;Muttucumaru Sivakumar;Stuart J. Khan;James A. McDonald

  • Chemical contaminants in swimming pools: occurrence, implications and control.

    Tiffany L.L. Teo;Heather M. Coleman;Stuart J. Khan

  • Effects of membrane degradation on the removal of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) by NF/RO filtration processes

    Alexander Simon;Long Duc Nghiem;Pierre Le-Clech;Stuart J. Khan

  • Lignin biogeochemistry: from modern processes to Quaternary archives

    Catherine N. Jex;Gary H. Pate;Alison J. Blyth;Robert G.M. Spencer

  • Characterising humic acid fouling of nanofiltration membranes using bisphenol A as a molecular indicator.

    Long D. Nghiem;Dirk Vogel;Dirk Vogel;Stuart Khan

  • An Outdoor Aging Study to Investigate the Release of Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) from Functional Textiles

    Unknown

  • N-nitrosamine removal by reverse osmosis for indirect potable water reuse - A critical review based on observations from laboratory-, pilot- and full-scale studies

    Takahiro Fujioka;Stuart J. Khan;Yvan Poussade;Yvan Poussade;Jörg E. Drewes;Jörg E. Drewes

  • Evaluation of effluent organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration treatment using advanced organic characterisation techniques

    Rita K. Henderson;Nashida Subhi;Alice Antony;Stuart J. Khan

  • Key objectives for water reuse concepts

    E. Huertas;M. Salgot;J. Hollender;S. Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg E. Drewes
Jörg E. Drewes Technical University of Munich
Long D. Nghiem
Long D. Nghiem University of Technology Sydney
Richard M. Stuetz
Richard M. Stuetz University of New South Wales
Andy Baker
Andy Baker University of New South Wales
Faisal I. Hai
Faisal I. Hai University of Wollongong
William E. Price
William E. Price University of Wollongong
Pierre Le-Clech
Pierre Le-Clech University of New South Wales
Frederic D.L. Leusch
Frederic D.L. Leusch Griffith University
Andrea I. Schäfer
Andrea I. Schäfer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can open diverse career pathways. A bachelors degree in sociology online offers valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment, complementing scientific knowledge with social perspectives.

Advancing your education further is possible through various doctoral programs. Many students seek programs like edd no dissertation options, which provide a flexible path for professionals aiming to improve community and environmental policies without the traditional dissertation requirement.

For educators and practitioners looking to deepen their expertise, an eds to edd bridge program offers a streamlined approach to doctoral attainment. These programs are ideal for environmental education professionals aspiring to leadership positions.

Lastly, individuals interested in social work’s intersection with environmental justice may consider fully funded dsw programs online. These programs provide advanced training in social work leadership, often focusing on community well-being and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart J. Khan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles