World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 106 937 1 925 48500

Jacek Namieśnik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jacek Namieśnik between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jacek Namieśnik published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 22.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 97 publications in 2018. 1 of the 1,068 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 97. Peak 97 publications in 2018. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 21 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 28 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 32 publications 2006: 38 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 36 publications 2009: 43 publications 2010: 57 publications 2011: 55 publications 2012: 61 publications 2013: 54 publications 2014: 77 publications 2015: 63 publications 2016: 91 publications 2017: 79 publications 2018: 97 publications 2019: 58 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

1,068 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jacek Namieśnik: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 3
1980 0
1981 2
1982 1
1983 3
1984 2
1985 3
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 3
1993 2
1994 0
1995 3
1996 5
1997 6
1998 6
1999 18
2000 21
2001 18
2002 18
2003 28
2004 19
2005 32
2006 38
2007 36
2008 36
2009 43
2010 57
2011 55
2012 61
2013 54
2014 77
2015 63
2016 91
2017 79
2018 97
2019 58
2020 15
2021 4
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 1,068
Download as CSV

Jacek Namieśnik publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Namieśnik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 921–940 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 925 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14 925
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jacek Namieśnik D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacek Namieśnik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88 106
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jacek Namieśnik was affiliated with Gdańsk University of Technology in Poland. Their research spanned several interconnected fields including Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Medicine, and Chemistry. They contributed to a range of subfields, notably Biochemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Biomedical Engineering, Food Science, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their work encompassed multiple main topics such as Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies, Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress, Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities, Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography, Effects and Risks of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals, Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact, and Botanical Research and Applications.

Prominent recent publications included the following:

  • Comparative evaluation of different methods for determining phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in products containing betalains - Verification of beetroot samples, 2021, Food Chemistry
  • Interactions between polyphenolic antioxidants quercetin and naringenin dictate the distinctive redox-related chemical and biological behaviour of their mixtures, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • The comparison of antioxidant properties and nutrigenomic redox-related activities of vitamin C, C-vitamers, and other common ascorbic acid derivatives, 2023, Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • Changes in daily life reduce indoor exposure to selected endocrine disruptors in the home environment: a pilot intervention study, 2020, Acta Biochimica Polonica
  • Beyond Antioxidant Activity: Redox Properties of Catechins May Affect Changes in the DNA Methylation Profile-The Example of SRXN1 Gene, 2023, Antioxidants

Frequent coauthors in Namieśnik's research included Klaudia Suliborska, Agnieszka Bartoszek, Barbara Kusznierewicz, Izabela Koss-Mikołajczyk, and Wojciech Chrzanowski.

Key publication venues where Namieśnik contributed multiple works were Acta Biochimica Polonica, Food Chemistry, Scientific Reports, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, and Journal of Chromatography B.

Best Publications

  • The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practices

    Agnieszka Gałuszka;Zdzisław M. Migaszewski;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Analytical eco-scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures

    Agnieszka Gałuszka;Zdzisław M. Migaszewski;Piotr Konieczka;Jacek Namieśnik

  • PAH diagnostic ratios for the identification of pollution emission sources

    Marek Tobiszewski;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Study of the selection mechanism of heavy metal (Pb2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+) adsorption on clinoptilolite.

    Myroslav Sprynskyy;Bogusław Buszewski;Artur P. Terzyk;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Modern trends in solid phase extraction: New sorbent media

    Justyna Płotka-Wasylka;Justyna Płotka-Wasylka;Natalia Szczepańska;Natalia Szczepańska;Miguel de la Guardia;Miguel de la Guardia;Jacek Namieśnik;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Review of sewage sludge management: standards, regulations and analytical methods.

    Bartłomiej Michał Cieślik;Jacek Namieśnik;Piotr Konieczka

  • Green Chemistry Metrics with Special Reference to Green Analytical Chemistry.

    Marek Tobiszewski;Mariusz Marć;Agnieszka Gałuszka;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Miniaturized solid-phase extraction techniques

    Justyna Płotka-Wasylka;Natalia Szczepańska;Miguel de la Guardia;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Passive sampling and/or extraction techniques in environmental analysis: a review

    Jacek Namieśnik;Bożena Zabiegała;Agata Kot-Wasik;Monika Partyka

  • The role of speciation in analytical chemistry

    Agata Kot;Jacek Namiesńik

  • Ionic liquids and deep eutectic mixtures: sustainable solvents for extraction processes

    Francisco Pena-Pereira;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Green analytical chemistry—theory and practice

    Marek Tobiszewski;Agata Mechlińska;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Antioxidants and proteins in ethylene-treated kiwifruits

    Yong-Seo Park;Soon-Teck Jung;Seong-Gook Kang;Buk Gu Heo

  • Green aspects, developments and perspectives of liquid phase microextraction techniques.

    Agata Spietelun;Łukasz Marcinkowski;Miguel de la Guardia;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Advances in passive sampling in environmental studies.

    Agata Kot-Wasik;Bożena Zabiegała;Magdalena Urbanowicz;Ewa Dominiak

  • Extraction with environmentally friendly solvents

    Justyna Płotka-Wasylka;Małgorzata Rutkowska;Katarzyna Owczarek;Marek Tobiszewski

  • Green analytical chemistry in sample preparation for determination of trace organic pollutants

    Marek Tobiszewski;Agata Mechlińska;Bogdan Zygmunt;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Current trends in solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibre coatings

    Agata Spietelun;Michał Pilarczyk;Adam Kloskowski;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Selected issues related to the toxicity of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents--a review

    Błażej Kudłak;Katarzyna Owczarek;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Estimating uncertainty in analytical procedures based on chromatographic techniques

    Piotr Konieczka;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE) in the Analysis of Environmental Solid Samples — Some Aspects of Theory and Practice

    Hanna Giergielewicz-Możajska;Łukasz Dąbrowski;Jacek Namieśnik

  • Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Mixtures: Sustainable Solvents for Extraction Processes

    Francisco Pena‐Pereira;Jacek Namiesnik

  • Green Analytical Chemistry —Theory and Practice

    Marek Tobiszewski;Agata Mechlinska;Jacek Namiesnik

Frequent Co-Authors

Tadeusz Górecki
Tadeusz Górecki University of Waterloo
Shela Gorinstein
Shela Gorinstein Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Piotr Szefer
Piotr Szefer Gdańsk Medical University
Miguel de la Guardia
Miguel de la Guardia University of Valencia
Bogusław Buszewski
Bogusław Buszewski Nicolaus Copernicus University
Krzysztof Formela
Krzysztof Formela Gdańsk University of Technology
Wojciech Kujawski
Wojciech Kujawski Nicolaus Copernicus University
Dimitra A. Lambropoulou
Dimitra A. Lambropoulou Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Artur P. Terzyk
Artur P. Terzyk Nicolaus Copernicus University
Andrew Collins
Andrew Collins University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in exploring careers related to Chemistry, several online degree options provide flexible paths to entry and advancement. When considering these programs, factors like program accreditation and costs matter. Research into criminal justice degree tuition can offer insights into budgeting for your education, though costs vary widely across fields.

Those seeking foundational knowledge might explore an accredited online criminal justice associate degree, which could complement chemical science studies by enhancing analytical and regulatory skills.

Additionally, pursuing degrees for paralegals presents another career avenue, blending legal expertise with industry knowledge that may be valuable in patent law or compliance roles within chemical sectors.

For those interested in the commercial side of chemistry-related products, learning how much do pharmaceutical sales reps make can help evaluate the potential of pharmaceutical sales roles, a common pathway leveraging chemical knowledge in the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Jacek Namieśnik

Recently Published Articles