World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew Collins

Andrew Collins

Award Badge
Genetics
Norway
2026
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
Norway
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 120 3727 3490 13 12 630 57060
Genetics 120 376 363 1 1 619 55566

Andrew Collins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew Collins between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew Collins published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 52 publications in 2014. 5 of the 785 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 52. Peak 52 publications in 2014. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 18 publications 1998: 20 publications 1999: 25 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 31 publications 2002: 27 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 41 publications 2012: 46 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 52 publications 2015: 51 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1982 2025

785 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew Collins: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 1
1989 2
1990 5
1991 7
1992 5
1993 4
1994 10
1995 15
1996 9
1997 18
1998 20
1999 25
2000 18
2001 31
2002 27
2003 18
2004 22
2005 22
2006 18
2007 22
2008 20
2009 26
2010 19
2011 41
2012 46
2013 43
2014 52
2015 51
2016 30
2017 32
2018 22
2019 28
2020 15
2021 17
2022 2
2023 33
2024 2
2025 3
Total 785
Download as CSV

Andrew Collins publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Collins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 615–624 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 619 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6 619
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew Collins D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Collins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 120–121 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29 120
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Genetics in Norway Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Genetics in Norway Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in Norway Leader Award
  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Norway Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in Norway Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Norway Leader Award

Overview

Andrew Collins is a researcher affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their work primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with particular attention to Genetics, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The main topics of their research cover a diverse range of areas including:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
  • Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

Their recent publications include:

  • "Predicting Pancreatic Cancer in the UK Biobank Cohort Using Polygenic Risk Scores and Diabetes Mellitus" (2022), published in Gastroenterology
  • "Towards digital engineering: the advent of digital systems engineering" (2020), published in the International Journal of System of Systems Engineering
  • "Analysis of rare disruptive germline mutations in 2135 enriched BRCA-negative breast cancers excludes additional high-impact susceptibility genes" (2022), published in Annals of Oncology
  • "Clinical and Descriptive Study of Orofacial Clefts in Colombia: 2069 Patients From Operation Smile Foundation" (2021), published in The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
  • "Essentiality-specific pathogenicity prioritization gene score to improve filtering of disease sequence data" (2020), published in Briefings in Bioinformatics

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Andrew Collins include:

  • Ignacio Briceño
  • William Tapper
  • Zaed Hamady
  • Julian Adlard
  • Julian Barwell

The scientists' work has also been published repeatedly in several venues, notably:

  • International Journal of System of Systems Engineering
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Genes
  • Gastroenterology
  • Annals of Oncology

Best Publications

  • The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations

    Andrew R. Collins

  • Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay

    A. Hartmann;E. Agurell;C. Beevers;S. Brendler-Schwaab

  • The single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): A European review

    V.J. McKelvey-Martin;M.H.L. Green;P. Schmezer;B.L. Pool-Zobel

  • An efficient procedure for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms.

    Shu Ye;Sahar Dhillon;Xiayi Ke;Andrew R. Collins

  • Direct enzymic detection of endogenous oxidative base damage in human lymphocyte DNA

    Andrew R. Collins;Susan J. Duthie;Victoria L. Dobson

  • The comet assay: topical issues

    Andrew R Collins;Amaia Azqueta Oscoz;Gunnar Brunborg;Isabel Gaivão;Isabel Gaivão

  • The kinetics of repair of oxidative DNA damage (strand breaks and oxidised pyrimidines) in human cells

    A R Collins;A G Ma;Susan Joyce Duthie

  • The comet assay: what can it really tell us?

    Andrew R Collins;Victoria L Dobson;Mária Dušinská;Gayle Kennedy

  • Comet assay in human biomonitoring studies: Reliability, validation, and applications

    Andrew Collins;Mária Dušinská;Michael Franklin;Martina Somorovská

  • Oxidative damage to DNA: do we have a reliable biomarker?

    A R Collins;M Dusinská;C M Gedik;R Stĕtina

  • Genome-wide association analysis of metabolic traits in a birth cohort from a founder population

    Chiara Sabatti;Anna-Liisa Hartikainen;Anneli Pouta

  • Antioxidant Supplementation Decreases Oxidative DNA Damage in Human Lymphocytes

    Susan J. Duthie;Aiguo Ma;Marion A. Ross;Andrew R. Collins

  • Mechanisms of genotoxicity. A review of in vitro and in vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles.

    Zuzana Magdolenova;Andrew Collins;Ashutosh Kumar;Alok Dhawan

  • Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study

    Catherine M. Gedik;Andrew Collins

  • Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup.

    Brian Burlinson;Raymond R. Tice;Günter Speit;Eva Agurell

  • Self-Assembling Cages from Coiled-Coil Peptide Modules

    Jordan M. Fletcher;Robert L. Harniman;Frederick R. H. Barnes;Aimee L. Boyle

  • The essential comet assay: a comprehensive guide to measuring DNA damage and repair

    Amaya Azqueta;Andrew R. Collins

  • Extended tracts of homozygosity in outbred human populations

    Jane Gibson;Newton E. Morton;Andrew Collins

  • JAK2 haplotype is a major risk factor for the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

    Amy V Jones;Andrew Chase;Richard T Silver;David Oscier

  • ANTIOXIDANT EFFICACY OF PHYTOESTROGENS IN CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL MODEL SYSTEMS

    Julie H. Mitchell;Peter T. Gardner;Donald B. McPhail;Philip C. Morrice

Frequent Co-Authors

Newton E. Morton
Newton E. Morton University of Southampton
David Oscier
David Oscier Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Gunnar Brunborg
Gunnar Brunborg Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Johannes M. H. M. Reul
Johannes M. H. M. Reul University of Bristol
Peter Møller
Peter Møller University of Copenhagen
Stephen Mann
Stephen Mann University of Bristol
John R. Speakman
John R. Speakman University of Aberdeen
Pavel Vodicka
Pavel Vodicka Czech Academy of Sciences
Diana Eccles
Diana Eccles University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in Genetics, there are several online degree pathways that can open doors to rewarding careers in healthcare and biomedical research. Many students pursue nursing or advanced practitioner roles to gain a strong clinical foundation before specializing further.

Cost is an important factor when choosing a program. Prospective students can find affordable fnp programs and explore cheap online nursing programs for a cost-effective way to enter the field. For those seeking advanced practice, pursuing the cheapest dnp online programs can lead to leadership or research positions.

Additionally, registered nurses can accelerate their careers and expand opportunities by discovering the rn to bsn online cost and choosing programs that fit their budget. By selecting affordable, accredited options, students can minimize debt while gaining the qualifications needed for genetics-related healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Collins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles