World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
112
Citations
40345
World Ranking
910
National Ranking
7

Peter Møller publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Møller sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 511 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter Møller D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Møller sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2003 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For his contributions in the areas of nuclear fission, nuclear masses, nuclear beta decay, data for astrophysical applications, and superheavy element stability and formation

Overview

Peter Møller is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these domains, they have focused extensively on subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research, and Molecular Biology, among others.

Their work addresses a variety of scientific topics, notably in Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment, Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications, Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals, Air Quality and Health Impacts, DNA Repair Mechanisms, Microplastics and Plastic Pollution, and Energy and Environment Impacts.

They have frequently published in several scientific journals, with multiple contributions to:

  • Mutagenesis
  • Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research
  • Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
  • Scientific Reports
  • Nature Protocols

Several recent papers exemplify the scope of their research, including:

  • "Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results" (2020, Nature Protocols)
  • "Measuring DNA modifications with the comet assay: a compendium of protocols" (2023, Nature Protocols)
  • "Carcinogenicity of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid" (2023, The Lancet Oncology)
  • "The genomic and transcriptional landscape of primary central nervous system lymphoma" (2022, Nature Communications)
  • "Biomarkers of nucleic acid oxidation - A summary state-of-the-art" (2021, Redox Biology)

Throughout their career, Peter Møller has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Martin Roursgaard
  • Ulla Vogel
  • Amaya Azqueta
  • Cristian Del Bo'
  • Andrew Collins

Best Publications

  • Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding

    Alice Valentini;Pierre Taberlet;Pierre Taberlet;Claude Miaud;Raphaël Civade

  • Oxidative stress-induced DNA damage by particulate air pollution.

    Lotte Risom;Peter Møller;Steffen Loft

  • MYC status in concert with BCL2 and BCL6 expression predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Heike Horn;Marita Ziepert;Claudia Becher;Thomas F. E. Barth

  • Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression as a predictor of prostate cancer progression

    Sven Perner;Sven Perner;Matthias D. Hofer;Matthias D. Hofer;Robert Kim;Robert Kim;Rajal B. Shah

  • The Comet Assay as a Rapid Test in Biomonitoring Occupational Exposure to DNA-damaging Agents and Effect of Confounding Factors

    Peter Møller;Lisbeth E. Knudsen;Steffen Loft;Håkan Wallin

  • Role of oxidative damage in toxicity of particulates

    Peter Møller;Nicklas R. Jacobsen;Janne K. Folkmann;Pernille H. Danielsen

  • Immunohistochemical study of the expression of a Mr 34,000 human epithelium-specific surface glycoprotein in normal and malignant tissues.

    Frank Momburg;Frank Momburg;Gerhard Moldenhauer;Günter J. Hämmerling;Peter Möller

  • Genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and reactive oxygen species induced by single-walled carbon nanotubes and C(60) fullerenes in the FE1-Mutatrade markMouse lung epithelial cells.

    Nicklas Raun Jacobsen;Giulio Pojana;Paul White;Peter Møller

  • Nanomaterials Versus Ambient Ultrafine Particles: An Opportunity to Exchange Toxicology Knowledge

    Vicki Stone;Mark R Miller;Martin J D Clift;Alison Elder

  • Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples

    Eva Egelyng Sigsgaard;Henrik Carl;Peter Rask Møller;Philip Francis Thomsen

  • Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes.

    Philip Francis Thomsen;Peter Rask Møller;Eva Egelyng Sigsgaard;Steen Wilhelm Knudsen

  • Oxidative stress and inflammation generated DNA damage by exposure to air pollution particles

    Peter Møller;Pernille Høgh Danielsen;Dorina Gabriela Karottki;Kim Jantzen

  • Lung inflammation and genotoxicity following pulmonary exposure to nanoparticles in ApoE-/- mice

    Nicklas Raun Jacobsen;Peter Møller;Keld Alstrup Jensen;Ulla Birgitte Vogel

  • In vivo toxicity of cationic micelles and liposomes.

    Kristina Bram Knudsen;Kristina Bram Knudsen;Helle Northeved;Pramod Kumar Ek;Anders Permin

  • Oxidative stress associated with exercise, psychological stress and life-style factors

    Peter Møller;Håkan Wallin;Lisbeth E Knudsen

  • Personal Exposure to Ultrafine Particles and Oxidative DNA Damage

    Peter S. Vinzents;Peter Møller;Mette Sørensen;Lisbeth E. Knudsen

  • Minimum Information for Reporting on the Comet Assay (MIRCA): recommendations for describing comet assay procedures and results

    Peter Møller;Amaya Azqueta;Elisa Boutet-Robinet;Gudrun Koppen

  • Imaging Prostate Cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT

    Sven N Reske;Norbert M Blumstein;Bernd Neumaier;Hans-Werner Gottfried

  • The Alkaline Comet Assay: Towards Validation in Biomonitoring of DNA Damaging Exposures

    Peter Møller

  • Air Pollution, oxidative damage to DNA, and carcinogenesis

    Peter Møller;Janne Kjærsgaard Folkmann;Lykke Forchhammer;Elvira Vaclavik Bräuner

  • Acute hypoxia and hypoxic exercise induce DNA strand breaks and oxidative DNA damage in humans

    Peter Møller;Steffen Loft;Carsten Lundby;Niels Vidiendal Olsen

  • Exposure to ambient concentrations of particulate air pollution does not influence vascular function or inflammatory pathways in young healthy individuals.

    Elvira V Bräuner;Peter Møller;Lars Barregard;Lars O Dragsted

Frequent Co-Authors

Steffen Loft
Steffen Loft University of Copenhagen
Håkan Wallin
Håkan Wallin National Institute of Occupational Health
Ulla Vogel
Ulla Vogel Technical University of Denmark
Lars O. Dragsted
Lars O. Dragsted University of Copenhagen
Andrew Collins
Andrew Collins University of Oslo
Patrizia Riso
Patrizia Riso University of Milan
Thomas F. E. Barth
Thomas F. E. Barth University of Ulm
Marisa Porrini
Marisa Porrini University of Milan
Henrik E. Poulsen
Henrik E. Poulsen University of Copenhagen
Michael K. Georgieff
Michael K. Georgieff University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways, many of which are accessible through online degrees. Those with a biological sciences background may consider roles in healthcare administration. For example, pursuing an mba healthcare management online can prepare graduates for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

Another popular route is medical billing and coding. Many students with science degrees transition into these roles due to the strong demand and clear career progression. It's important to understand the differences between professional certifications, such as ccs vs cpc, as salaries and opportunities can vary depending on your credentials.

If you’re wondering how long does it take to become a medical coder, the answer depends on the program and certification you choose, but many can be completed in under a year. The medical coding job outlook remains strong, offering job stability and the flexibility of remote work. Consider these pathways as you plan your future in biology or biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Møller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles