World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wolfram Klapper

Wolfram Klapper

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
49198
World Ranking
6173
National Ranking
350

Wolfram Klapper publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfram Klapper sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 615 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Wolfram Klapper D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfram Klapper sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wolfram Klapper is affiliated with Kiel University in Germany and has a research focus predominantly in the field of Medicine. Their extensive publication record is centered on subfields such as Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Genetics, Immunology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work primarily addresses key topics including Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment, Viral-associated cancers and disorders, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research, CAR-T cell therapy research, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, Immune Cell Function and Interaction, and CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment.

Their notable recent publications include:

  • The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms (2022), published in Leukemia
  • Efficacy of Nivolumab and AVD in Early-Stage Unfavorable Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (2020), published in JAMA Oncology
  • Genomic profiling for clinical decision making in lymphoid neoplasms (2022), published in Blood
  • The genomic and transcriptional landscape of primary central nervous system lymphoma (2022), published in Nature Communications
  • Ibrutinib combined with immunochemotherapy with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation versus immunochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma (TRIANGLE): a three-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network (2024), published in The Lancet

Wolfram Klapper has collaborated frequently with coauthors such as Andreas Rosenwald, Ilske Oschlies, Julia Richter, Birgit Burkhardt, and Eva Hoster.

The scientist's work is regularly published in respected venues, including:

  • Blood
  • Leukemia
  • HemaSphere
  • Hematological Oncology
  • Haematologica

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Blinatumomab versus Chemotherapy for Advanced Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    Hagop M Kantarjian;Anthony Stein;Nicola Gökbuget;Adele K. Fielding

  • The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers

    Susanne N. Gröbner;Barbara C. Worst;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Joachim Weischenfeldt;Ivo Buchhalter

  • A Biologic Definition of Burkitt's Lymphoma from Transcriptional and Genomic Profiling

    Michael Hummel;Stefan Bentink;Hilmar Berger;Wolfram Klapper

  • A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma

    Eva Hoster;Martin Dreyling;Wolfram Klapper;Christian Gisselbrecht

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

    Barbara Eichhorst;Anna-Maria Fink;Jasmin Bahlo;Raymonde Busch

  • Obinutuzumab for the First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma

    Robert Marcus;Andrew Davies;Kiyoshi Ando;Wolfram Klapper

  • Integration of gene mutations in risk prognostication for patients receiving first-line immunochemotherapy for follicular lymphoma: a retrospective analysis of a prospective clinical trial and validation in a population-based registry

    Alessandro Pastore;Vindi Jurinovic;Robert Kridel;Eva Hoster

  • MYC status in concert with BCL2 and BCL6 expression predicts outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Heike Horn;Marita Ziepert;Claudia Becher;Thomas F. E. Barth

  • Treatment of Older Patients with Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

    H. C. Kluin-Nelemans;Eva Hoster;Olivier Hermine;J. Walewski

  • TNFAIP3 (A20) is a tumor suppressor gene in Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma

    Roland Schmitz;Martin-Leo Hansmann;Verena Bohle;Jose Ignacio Martin-Subero

  • Landscape of somatic mutations and clonal evolution in mantle cell lymphoma

    Sílvia Beà;Rafael Valdés-Mas;Alba Navarro;Itziar Salaverria

  • Recurrent mutation of the ID3 gene in Burkitt lymphoma identified by integrated genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing

    Julia Richter;Matthias Schlesner;Steve Hoffmann;Markus Kreuz

  • Addition of high-dose cytarabine to immunochemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients aged 65 years or younger with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL Younger): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network

    Olivier Hermine;Olivier Hermine;Eva Hoster;Jan Walewski;André Bosly

  • Immunohistochemical Prognostic Markers in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Validation of Tissue Microarray As a Prerequisite for Broad Clinical Applications—A Study From the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium

    Daphne de Jong;Andreas Rosenwald;Mukesh Chhanabhai;Philippe Gaulard

  • Histopathology, cell proliferation indices and clinical outcome in 304 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): a clinicopathological study from the European MCL Network.

    Markus Tiemann;Carsten Schrader;Wolfram Klapper;Martin H. Dreyling

  • Prognostic Value of Ki-67 Index, Cytology, and Growth Pattern in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: Results From Randomized Trials of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network

    Eva Hoster;Andreas Rosenwald;Françoise Berger;Heinz-Wolfram Bernd

  • Origin and pathogenesis of nodular lymphocyte–predominant Hodgkin lymphoma as revealed by global gene expression analysis

    Verena Brune;Enrico Tiacci;Ines Pfeil;Claudia Döring

  • Immunohistochemical prognostic markers in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: validation of tissue microarray as a prerequisite for broad clinical applications (a study from the Lunenburg Lymphoma Biomarker Consortium)

    Daphne de Jong;Wanling Xie;Andreas Rosenwald;Mukesh Chhanabhai

Frequent Co-Authors

Reiner Siebert
Reiner Siebert University of Ulm
Andreas Rosenwald
Andreas Rosenwald University of Würzburg
Martin Dreyling
Martin Dreyling Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
German Ott
German Ott Robert Bosch (Germany)
Wolfgang Hiddemann
Wolfgang Hiddemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Harald Stein
Harald Stein Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ralf Küppers
Ralf Küppers University of Duisburg-Essen
Lorenz Trümper
Lorenz Trümper University of Göttingen
Olivier Hermine
Olivier Hermine Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital
Michael Kneba
Michael Kneba Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering medical studies in the USA also opens doors to a wide range of online nursing degrees, making healthcare careers more accessible and flexible. For those interested in advanced practice roles, the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs offer a cost-effective path to becoming a nurse practitioner without sacrificing quality.

Affordability is a key factor when selecting an online nursing school. If you're wondering how much does online nursing school cost, you'll find that there are many programs with reasonable tuition and flexible payment options, helping reduce financial barriers.

For registered nurses seeking to advance their qualifications, the cheapest rn to bsn program choices allow you to earn a bachelor's degree from home, often while continuing to work. For those pursuing academia or advanced research, phd nursing education online programs provide a route to doctoral qualifications without relocating.

These online pathways let students balance learning, work, and personal commitments while preparing for in-demand roles across the American healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfram Klapper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles