World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
18817
World Ranking
2312
National Ranking
1154

Don Batory publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don Batory sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 274 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Don Batory D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Don Batory sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Don Batory is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research spans multiple areas within software engineering and artificial intelligence, with a focus on advanced methodologies and software reliability.

The main fields of study associated with Don Batory's work include:

  • Computer Science

Their research is further specialized in these subfields of study:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Software
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Don Batory's primary topics of work cover several aspects of software engineering research and development, including:

  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques

Their publication record includes research articles appearing in multiple scholarly venues. Frequent publication venues are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science
  • Journal of Systems and Software

Notable papers authored or co-authored by Don Batory include:

  • "Modularizing Theorems for Software Product Lines: The Jbook Case Study," 2020, JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science
  • "Uniform and scalable sampling of highly configurable systems," 2022, Empirical Software Engineering
  • "Finding Near-optimal Configurations in Colossal Spaces with Statistical Guarantees," 2023, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • "Transforming Numerical Feature Models into Propositional Formulas and the Universal Variability Language," 2023, Journal of Systems and Software
  • "On Proving the Correctness of Refactoring Class Diagrams of MDE Metamodels," 2022, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Don Batory collaborates with a consistent group of frequent co-authors, reflecting ongoing research partnerships. These include:

  • Rubén Heradio
  • Jeho Oh
  • Daniel-Jesús Munoz
  • Mónica Pinto
  • Lidia Fuentes

Best Publications

  • Feature models, grammars, and propositional formulas

    Don Batory

  • Scaling step-wise refinement

    D. Batory;J.N. Sarvela;A. Rauschmayer

  • Feature-Oriented Software Product Lines

    Sven Apel;Don Batory;Christian Kästner;Gunter Saake

  • The design and implementation of hierarchical software systems with reusable components

    Don Batory;Sean O'Malley

  • Feature-Oriented Software Product Lines: Concepts and Implementation

    Sven Apel;Don Batory;Christian Kstner;Gunter Saake

  • Reasoning about edits to feature models

    Thomas Thum;Don Batory;Christian Kastner

  • Mixin layers: an object-oriented implementation technique for refinements and collaboration-based designs

    Yannis Smaragdakis;Don Batory

  • Modeling concepts for VLSI CAD objects

    D. S. Batory;Won Kim

  • Implementing layered designs with mixin layers

    Y. Smaragdakis;D. Batory

  • Automated analysis of feature models: challenges ahead

    Don Batory;David Benavides;Antonio Ruiz-Cortes

  • Evolving object-oriented designs with refactorings

    L. Tokuda;D. Batory

  • Safe composition of product lines

    Sahil Thaker;Don Batory;David Kitchin;William Cook

  • Feature oriented refactoring of legacy applications

    Jia Liu;Don Batory;Christian Lengauer

  • TSQL2 language specification

    Richard Thomas Snodgrass;Ilsoo Ahn;Gadi Ariav;Don Batory

  • JTS: tools for implementing domain-specific languages

    D. Batory;B. Lofaso;Y. Smaragdakis

  • Composition validation and subjectivity in GenVoca generators

    D. Batory;B.J. Geraci

  • A Standard Problem for Evaluating Product-Line Methodologies

    Roberto E. Lopez-Herrejon;Don S. Batory

  • Predicting performance via automated feature-interaction detection

    Norbert Siegmund;Sergiy S. Kolesnikov;Christian Kastner;Sven Apel

  • Feature-oriented programming and the AHEAD tool suite

    Don Batory

  • Achieving extensibility through product-lines and domain-specific languages: a case study

    Don Batory;Clay Johnson;Bob MacDonald;Dale von Heeder

Frequent Co-Authors

Sven Apel
Sven Apel Saarland University
Christian Kästner
Christian Kästner Carnegie Mellon University
Gunter Saake
Gunter Saake Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Yannis Smaragdakis
Yannis Smaragdakis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Sarfraz Khurshid
Sarfraz Khurshid The University of Texas at Austin
Danny Dig
Danny Dig University of Colorado Boulder
Dewayne E. Perry
Dewayne E. Perry The University of Texas at Austin
William R. Cook
William R. Cook The University of Texas at Austin
Robert A. van de Geijn
Robert A. van de Geijn The University of Texas at Austin
David Benavides
David Benavides University of Seville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens a wide array of online degree and career options. For students considering their future impact and job security, Computer Science consistently ranks among the top 10 best majors for the future. This makes it a strategic choice for stable, high-paying roles as technology evolves.

For those interested in further advancing their education, exploring what's the easiest masters degree to get might help identify programs that fit a busy professional schedule. Flexible learning options and programs with practical coursework can allow learners to upskill while working.

Looking further ahead, many professionals are examining affordable phd programs online to achieve expertise without significant financial strain. Cost-effective doctoral programs make advanced research-oriented careers more accessible than ever.

If accelerating your academic or leadership trajectory is a priority, accelerated edd programs online offer fast-track options for educators and leaders wanting to make a bigger impact quickly. Whether targeting technical or educational pathways, online degrees provide flexibility and robust opportunities in the field of Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Don Batory

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles