World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
9939
World Ranking
5364
National Ranking
18

Alessandro Garcia publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessandro Garcia sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 362 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alessandro Garcia D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessandro Garcia sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alessandro Garcia is affiliated with the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil and has a research focus primarily within the broad field of Computer Science. Their work concentrates on several subfields including Information Systems, Software, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, and Signal Processing.

Their main topics of research encompass Software Engineering Research, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Software System Performance and Reliability, Information and Cyber Security, Web Application Security Vulnerabilities, and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies.

Alessandro Garcia has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Information and Software Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development

Their recent papers include:

  • "Refactoring effect on internal quality attributes: What haven't they told you yet?" published in 2020 in Information and Software Technology
  • "Code and commit metrics of developer productivity: a study on team leaders perceptions" published in 2020 in Empirical Software Engineering
  • "An efficient approach for reviewing security-related aspects in agile requirements specifications of web applications" published in 2020 in Requirements Engineering
  • "How do Code Smell Co-occurrences Removal Impact Internal Quality Attributes? A Developers' Perspective" published in 2021 in Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
  • "Evaluating refactorings for disciplining #ifdef annotations: An eye tracking study with novices" published in 2021 in Empirical Software Engineering

Frequent co-authors in Alessandro Garcia's research collaborations include Wesley K. G. Assunção, Anderson Uchôa, Marcos Kalinowski, Baldoíno Fonseca, and Willian Oizumi. These collaborations reflect sustained partnerships contributing to the research output.

Best Publications

  • Evolving software product lines with aspects: an empirical study on design stability

    Eduardo Figueiredo;Nelio Cacho;Claudio Sant'Anna;Mario Monteiro

  • Modularizing design patterns with aspects: a quantitative study

    Alessandro Garcia;Cláudio Sant'Anna;Eduardo Figueiredo;Uirá Kulesza

  • On the Reuse and Maintenance of Aspect-Oriented Software: An Assessment Framework

    Cláudio Nogueira Sant’Anna;Alessandro Fabricio Garcia;Carlos José Pereira de Lucena;Arndt von Staa

  • On the impact of aspectual decompositions on design stability: an empirical study

    Phil Greenwood;Thiago Bartolomei;Eduardo Figueiredo;Marcos Dosea

  • A Comparitive study of exception handling mechanisms for building dependable object-oriented software

    Alessandro F. Garcia;Cecília M.F. Rubira;Alexander Romanovsky;Jie Xu

  • Software Engineering for Multi-Agent Systems II

    Carlos Lucena;Alessandro Garcia;Alexander Romanovsky;Jaelson Castro

  • Separation of concerns in multi-agent systems: An empirical study

    Alessandro Garcia;Claudio Sant'anna;Christina Chavez;Viviane Torres Da Silva

  • Survey of Aspect-Oriented Analysis and Design Approaches

    Ruzanna Chitchyan;A. Rashid;P. Sawyer;A. Garcia

  • Composing design patterns: a scalability study of aspect-oriented programming

    Nelio Cacho;Claudio Sant'Anna;Eduardo Figueiredo;Alessandro Garcia

  • Are automatically-detected code anomalies relevant to architectural modularity?: an exploratory analysis of evolving systems

    Isela Macia;Joshua Garcia;Daniel Popescu;Alessandro Garcia

  • On the Relevance of Code Anomalies for Identifying Architecture Degradation Symptoms

    Isela Macia;Roberta Arcoverde;Alessandro Garcia;Christina Chavez

  • Quantifying the Effects of Aspect-Oriented Programming: A Maintenance Study

    Uira Kulesza;Claudio Sant'Anna;Alessandro Garcia;Roberta Coelho

  • Exceptions and aspects: the devil is in the details

    Fernando Castor Filho;Nelio Cacho;Eduardo Figueiredo;Raquel Maranhão

  • Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems

    Alessandro Garcia;Carlos Lucena;Franco Zambonelli;Andrea Omicini

  • Assessing the Impact of Aspects on Exception Flows: An Exploratory Study

    Roberta Coelho;Awais Rashid;Alessandro Garcia;Fabiano Ferrari

  • Agents in object-oriented software engineering

    Alessandro F. Garcia;Carlos J. P. de Lucena;Donald D. Cowan

  • Code anomalies flock together: exploring code anomaly agglomerations for locating design problems

    Willian Oizumi;Alessandro Garcia;Leonardo da Silva Sousa;Bruno Cafeo

  • Understanding the longevity of code smells: preliminary results of an explanatory survey

    Roberta Arcoverde;Alessandro Garcia;Eduardo Figueiredo

  • Taming agents and objects in software engineering

    Viviane Silva;Alessandro Garcia;Anarosa Brandão;Christina Chavez

  • How does refactoring affect internal quality attributes?: A multi-project study

    Alexander Chávez;Isabella Ferreira;Eduardo Fernandes;Diego Cedrim

  • Exceptions and aspects: the devil is in the details

    Fernando Castor;Nelio Cacho;Eduardo Figueiredo;Raquel Maranhao

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos José Pereira de Lucena
Carlos José Pereira de Lucena Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro
Alexander Romanovsky
Alexander Romanovsky Newcastle University
Thais Batista
Thais Batista Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
Awais Rashid
Awais Rashid University of Bristol
Yuanfang Cai
Yuanfang Cai Drexel University
Jon Whittle
Jon Whittle Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Paulo Borba
Paulo Borba Federal University of Pernambuco
Holger Giese
Holger Giese Hasso Plattner Institute
Tom Holvoet
Tom Holvoet KU Leuven
Andrea Omicini
Andrea Omicini University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring Computer Science programs in the USA, you might also be interested in related STEM fields available through online degrees. Choosing a mechanical engineering degree online cost is a practical consideration for many students, as affordability and flexibility are increasingly important in today’s education landscape.

For those fascinated by scientific principles, several universities now offer rigorous online physics degrees, giving you access to high-quality education remotely. Likewise, data-driven industries are booming, making a data science degree a popular choice for students aiming for fast-growing tech career paths.

If your passion lies in electronics and technology, understanding electrical engineering degree online admissions requirements can open further professional opportunities. Each of these online degrees provides a flexible option to gain valuable skills in highly sought-after fields, helping you tailor your studies to your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Alessandro Garcia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles