World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
70
Citations
17317
World Ranking
1684
National Ranking
706

David C. Goodrich publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Goodrich sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 341 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David C. Goodrich D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Goodrich sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

David C. Goodrich is affiliated with the US Department of Agriculture in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science, and Soil Science.

Their research topics cover a range of environmental and hydrological themes such as Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, and Precipitation Measurement and Analysis.

David C. Goodrich has contributed to multiple scholarly papers. Recent publications include:

  • Comparative analysis of water budgets across the U.S. long-term agroecosystem research network (2020) in Journal of Hydrology
  • The timing and magnitude of changes to Hortonian overland flow at the watershed scale during the post-fire recovery process (2021) in Hydrological Processes
  • Frequency analysis of storm-scale soil erosion and characterization of extreme erosive events by linking the DWEPP model and a stochastic rainfall generator (2021) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Hydrological modelling in desert areas of the eastern Mediterranean (2020) in Journal of Hydrology
  • Global sensitivity analysis of KINEROS2 hydrologic model parameters representing green infrastructure using the STAR-VARS framework (2020) in Environmental Modelling & Software

The scientist frequently collaborates with others including Andrew T. Fullhart, M. A. Nearing, M. M. Bitew, Haiyan Wei, and Mariano Hernández.

David C. Goodrich's research is also published in various scientific venues with multiple contributions to Hydrological Processes, The Journal of Urology, Journal of Hydrology, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, and The Science of The Total Environment.

In 2013, they were recognized as a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

Best Publications

  • Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites

    A. Colliander;T.J. Jackson;R. Bindlish;S. Chan

  • Assessment of the SMAP Passive Soil Moisture Product

    Steven K. Chan;Rajat Bindlish;Peggy E. O'Neill;Eni Njoku

  • Validation of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer Soil Moisture Products

    T J Jackson;M H Cosh;R Bindlish;P J Starks

  • Integration of soil moisture remote sensing and hydrologic modeling using data assimilation

    Paul R. Houser;Paul R. Houser;W. James Shuttleworth;James S. Famiglietti;Hoshin V. Gupta

  • At what scales do climate variability and land cover change impact on flooding and low flows

    Günter Blöschl;Sandra Ardoin‐Bardin;Mike Bonell;Manfred Dorninger

  • Validation of Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) Soil Moisture Over Watershed Networks in the U.S.

    T. J. Jackson;R. Bindlish;M. H. Cosh;Tianjie Zhao

  • Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling

    Jean-Marc Faurès;D.C. Goodrich;David A. Woolhiser;Soroosh Sorooshian

  • KINEROS - a kinematic runoff and erosion model

    R. E. Smith;D. C. Goodrich;D. A. Woolhiser;C. L. Unkrich

  • Linearity of basin response as a function of scale in a semiarid watershed

    David C. Goodrich;Leonard J. Lane;Rose M. Shillito;Scott N. Miller

  • Spatial and temporal dynamics of vegetation in the San Pedro River basin area

    J Qi;R.C Marsett;M.S Moran;D.C Goodrich

  • Measurement and analysis of small-scale convective storm rainfall variability

    David C. Goodrich;Jean-Marc Faurès;David A. Woolhiser;Leonard J. Lane

  • Ecohydrological impacts of woody‐plant encroachment: seasonal patterns of water and carbon dioxide exchange within a semiarid riparian environment

    Russell L. Scott;Travis E. Huxman;David G. Williams;David C. Goodrich

  • Spatial characteristics of thunderstorm rainfall fields and their relation to runoff

    Kamran H. Syed;David C. Goodrich;Donald E. Myers;Soroosh Sorooshian

  • Remote Sensing for Grassland Management in the Arid Southwest

    Robert C. Marsett;Jiaguo Qi;Philip Heilman;Sharon H. Biedenbender

  • Modeling runoff response to land cover and rainfall spatial variability in semi-arid watersheds.

    Mariano Hernandez;Scott N. Miller;David C. Goodrich;Bruce F. Goff

  • Integrating landscape assessment and hydrologic modeling for land cover change analysis

    Scott N. Miller;William G. Kepner;Megan H. Mehaffey;Mariano Hernandez

  • Combining the Penman-Monteith equation with measurements of surface temperature and reflectance to estimate evaporation rates of semiarid grassland

    M.S. Moran;A.F. Rahman;J.C. Washburne;D.C. Goodrich

  • The Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment tool

    Scott N. Miller;Darius J. Semmens;David C. Goodrich;Mariano Hernandez

  • Interannual and seasonal variation in fluxes of water and carbon dioxide from a riparian woodland ecosystem

    Russell L. Scott;Eric A. Edwards;W.James Shuttleworth;Travis E. Huxman

  • Trends in water balance components across the Brazilian Cerrado

    Paulo Tarso Sanches Oliveira;Mark A. Nearing;M. Susan Moran;David C. Goodrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell L. Scott
Russell L. Scott Agricultural Research Service
Soroosh Sorooshian
Soroosh Sorooshian University of California, Irvine
Hoshin V. Gupta
Hoshin V. Gupta University of Arizona
David D. Bosch
David D. Bosch Agricultural Research Service
Michael H. Cosh
Michael H. Cosh Agricultural Research Service
Thomas J. Jackson
Thomas J. Jackson Agricultural Research Service
David G. Williams
David G. Williams University of Wyoming
M.S. Moran
M.S. Moran Agricultural Research Service
Yann Kerr
Yann Kerr Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Christopher J. Watts
Christopher J. Watts Universidad de Sonora

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences can lead to diverse educational opportunities and rewarding careers. For those interested in Earth’s physical processes, pursuing a geologist degree online offers a practical path to understanding rock formations, natural resources, and environmental hazards. This foundation supports roles in environmental consulting and resource management.

Another promising route is specializing in spatial data analysis through a best gis undergraduate programs. GIS expertise is crucial for mapping environmental changes, urban planning, and disaster response, making it a highly sought-after skill in the environmental sector.

For professionals aiming to influence public policy or administration related to environmental issues, a one year mpa program is ideal. This accelerated degree hones leadership and management skills necessary for driving sustainable development initiatives at governmental or nonprofit organizations.

Lastly, understanding the human dimension of environmental challenges is vital. Earning a sociology bachelor degree online equips students with insights into social behavior and community dynamics, which are essential for effective environmental advocacy and education.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Goodrich

Trending Scientists