World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
7681
World Ranking
6724
National Ranking
677

David Messer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Messer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 168 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Messer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Messer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Messer is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Psychology, with a specialization in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Additional fields of study include Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's work covers several main research topics, notably:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Teaching and Learning Programming

David Messer has published research in multiple academic venues, with frequent publication appearances in:

  • Journal of Cognition
  • Brain Sciences
  • The Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development
  • Early Childhood Education Journal
  • Frontiers in Nutrition

Among the recent published papers associated with their work are:

  • "Can Pre-school Children Learn Programming and Coding Through Guided Play Activities? A Case Study in Computational Thinking," 2021, Early Childhood Education Journal
  • "Investigating Reading Comprehension in Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities: Evaluating the Simple View of Reading," 2021, Journal of Cognition
  • "Decoding Abilities in Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities: The Contribution of Cognition, Language, and Home Literacy," 2021, Journal of Cognition
  • "Parent, child, and environmental predictors of vegetable consumption in Italian, Polish, and British preschoolers," 2022, Frontiers in Nutrition
  • "Me and my veggies: The use of interactive, personalised picture books in healthy eating interventions," 2020, Nutrition Bulletin

Frequent coauthors who have contributed to publications alongside David Messer include:

  • Lucy A. Henry
  • Henrik Danielsson
  • Valerie Critten
  • Karin Nilsson
  • Åsa Elwér

The research contributions of David Messer cover a broad range within developmental and educational psychology. Their investigations into reading comprehension and decoding abilities particularly address adolescents with intellectual disabilities, while other work explores nutritional behaviors in young children across different countries. Additionally, their focus on teaching programming to young children highlights interdisciplinary approaches involving digital technology and cognitive development.

Best Publications

  • New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad

    Rosie Flewitt;David Messer;Natalia Kucirkova

  • Executive functioning in children with specific language impairment

    Lucy A. Henry;David J. Messer;Gilly Nash

  • Spontaneous play in children with autism : A reappraisal

    Sarah Libby;Stuart Powell;David Messer;Rita Jordan

  • Children's engagement with educational iPad apps: Insights from a Spanish classroom

    Natalia Kucirkova;David Messer;Kieron Sheehy;Carmen Fernández Panadero

  • Recall for Self and Other in Autism: Children's Memory for Events Experienced by Themselves and Their Peers

    Claire Millward;Stuart Powell;David Messer;Rita Jordan

  • Prospective memory in children: The effects of age and task interruption.

    Lia Kvavilashvili;David J. Messer;Pippa Ebdon

  • Children's Misconceptions in Primary Science: A Survey of teachers' views

    Karen Pine;David Messer;Kate St. John

  • More Gestures Than Answers: Children Learning About Balance

    Karen J. Pine;Nicola Lufkin;David Messer

  • Strengths and weaknesses in executive functioning in children with intellectual disability

    Henrik Danielsson;Lucy Henry;David Messer;Jerker Rönnberg;Jerker Rönnberg

  • Children’s Naming and Word-Finding Difficulties: Descriptions and Explanations

    David Messer;Julie E. Dockrell

  • The Development of Communication: From Social Interaction to Language

    David J. Messer

  • Touching the virtual, touching the real: iPads and enabling literacy for students experiencing disability

    Rosie Flewitt;Natalia Kucirkova;David Messer

  • Imitation of Pretend Play Acts by Children with Autism and Down Syndrome

    Sarah Libby;Stuart Powell;David Messer;Rita Jordan

  • Relation Between Mastery Behavior in Infancy and Competence in Early Childhood.

    David J. Messer

  • Sharing personalised stories on iPads: a close look at one parent-child interaction

    Natalia Kucirkova;David Messer;Kieron Sheehy;Rosie Flewitt

  • The Integration of Mothers' Referential Speech with Joint Play.

    David J. Messer

  • Executive functions in adults with developmental dyslexia.

    James H. Smith-Spark;Lucy A. Henry;David J. Messer;Elisa Edvardsdottir

  • Social and communicative processes in computer-based problem solving

    Paul Light;Karen Littleton;David Messer;Richard Joiner

  • The Effect of Explaining Another's Actions on Children's Implicit Theories of Balance.

    Karen J. Pine;David J. Messer

  • It is best to point for young children: a comparison of children's pointing and dragging

    R Joiner;D Messer;P Light;K Littleton

  • The development of prospective memory in children : Methodological issues, empirical findings, and future directions

    Lia Kvavilashvili;Fiona E. Kyle;David J. Messer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lucy A. Henry
Lucy A. Henry City, University of London
Natalia Kucirkova
Natalia Kucirkova University of Stavanger
Julie E. Dockrell
Julie E. Dockrell University College London
Karen Littleton
Karen Littleton The Open University
Jerker Rönnberg
Jerker Rönnberg Linköping University
David J. Torgerson
David J. Torgerson University of York
Lia Kvavilashvili
Lia Kvavilashvili University of Hertfordshire
Suzanne P. Murphy
Suzanne P. Murphy University of Hawaii at Manoa
Laura Crane
Laura Crane University of Birmingham
Elisabeth L. Hill
Elisabeth L. Hill Goldsmiths University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide variety of online programs and rewarding career pathways. Many students are drawn to specialized fields such as marriage and family therapy (MFT), which often require region-specific educational steps and licensure.

For example, the St. Petersburg mft education requirements highlight the need for accredited graduate coursework, supervised clinical experience, and passing state licensing exams. Meanwhile, those wondering how to become an mft in Stockton should pay close attention to California’s regulations, which emphasize graduate education and significant clinical training hours.

If you’re exploring options in Florida, be sure to review the Tampa mft education requirements, as they dictate specific coursework and fieldwork. Similarly, the Toledo mft education requirements outline Ohio’s unique pathway to licensure.

Online degrees can help you pursue these pathways with flexibility, letting you meet nationwide and region-specific requirements for MFTs and other psychology careers. Always check state regulations to ensure your degree plan aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing David Messer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles