World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Susan Goldin-Meadow

Susan Goldin-Meadow

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 108 975 931 594 563 409 44220
Psychology 110 397 349 252 218 386 46325

Susan Goldin-Meadow publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susan Goldin-Meadow between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susan Goldin-Meadow published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2014. 23 of the 434 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2014. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 6 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications
1975 2025

434 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susan Goldin-Meadow: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 1
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 1
1989 1
1990 6
1991 2
1992 4
1993 8
1994 3
1995 3
1996 2
1997 5
1998 7
1999 10
2000 4
2001 6
2002 6
2003 7
2004 4
2005 19
2006 6
2007 11
2008 10
2009 15
2010 16
2011 13
2012 19
2013 19
2014 27
2015 21
2016 14
2017 24
2018 23
2019 20
2020 18
2021 26
2022 9
2023 8
2024 13
2025 10
Total 434
Download as CSV

Susan Goldin-Meadow publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Goldin-Meadow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 386 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 386
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Susan Goldin-Meadow D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan Goldin-Meadow sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 110–111 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35 110
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2021 - David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition
  • 2020 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2015 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2000 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Susan Goldin-Meadow is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States and specializes in the field of psychology. Their research primarily focuses on developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, language and linguistics, cognitive neuroscience, and human-computer interaction.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Hearing Impairment and Communication
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

The scientist has published extensively, with notable recent papers including:

  • Current Research in Pragmatic Language Use Among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children, 2020, PEDIATRICS
  • Sign language, like spoken language, promotes object categorization in young hearing infants, 2021, Cognition
  • Linking language to sensory experience: Onomatopoeia in early language development, 2020, Developmental Science
  • The communicative importance of agent-backgrounding: Evidence from homesign and Nicaraguan Sign Language, 2020, Cognition
  • Effects of Time-Varying Parent Input on Children's Language Outcomes Differ for Vocabulary and Syntax, 2021, Psychological Science

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Cognition
  • Developmental Science
  • Psychological Science
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • PEDIATRICS

Collaborations have involved several co-authors who frequently contribute to their work:

  • Diane Brentari
  • Susan C. Levine
  • Miriam A. Novack
  • Daniel Casasanto
  • Laura Horton

Susan Goldin-Meadow has been recognized by multiple awards, including:

  • David E. Rumelhart Prize for Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Human Cognition (2021)
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2020)
  • William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA) (2015)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2005)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2001)
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (2000)

Best Publications

  • Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think

    Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Gesture Paves the Way for Language Development

    Jana M. Iverson;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Explaining Math: Gesturing Lightens the Load

    Susan Goldin-Meadow;Howard Nusbaum;Spencer D. Kelly;Susan Wagner

  • The role of gesture in communication and thinking

    Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge.

    R. Breckinridge Church;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • The Resilience of Language : What Gesture Creation in Deaf Children Can Tell Us About How All Children Learn Language

    Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought

    Dedre Gentner;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Gesturing makes learning last

    Susan Wagner Cook;Zachary Mitchell;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Why people gesture when they speak

    Jana M. Iverson;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Gesture-Speech Mismatch and Mechanisms of Learning: What the Hands Reveal about a Child's State of Mind.

    Martha Wagner Alibali;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind

    Susan Goldin-Meadow;Martha Wagner Alibali;R. Breckinridge Church

  • Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas About Math

    Susan Goldin-Meadow;Susan Wagner Cook;Zachary A. Mitchell

  • Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry

    Meredith L. Rowe;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Parent praise to 1- to 3-year-olds predicts children's motivational frameworks 5 years later.

    Elizabeth A. Gunderson;Sarah J. Gripshover;Carissa Romero;Carol S. Dweck

  • Making Children Gesture Brings out Implicit Knowledge and Leads to Learning.

    Sara C. Broaders;Susan Wagner Cook;Zachary Mitchell;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Gesture's Role in Speaking, Learning, and Creating Language

    Susan Goldin-Meadow;Martha Wagner Alibali

  • Gestural communication in deaf children: the effects and noneffects of parental input on early language development.

    Susan Goldin-Meadow;Carolyn Mylander

  • Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures

    Susan Goldin-Meadow;Carolyn Mylander

  • Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning

    Meredith Lee Rowe;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • Gesture is at the cutting edge of early language development

    Şeyda Özçalışkan;Susan Goldin-Meadow

  • The effects of learning two languages on levels of metalinguistic awareness.

    Sylvia Joseph Galambos;Susan Goldin-Meadow

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan C. Levine
Susan C. Levine University of Chicago
Steven L. Small
Steven L. Small The University of Texas at Dallas
Dedre Gentner
Dedre Gentner Northwestern University
Diane Brentari
Diane Brentari University of Chicago
Martha W. Alibali
Martha W. Alibali University of Wisconsin–Madison
Asli Ozyurek
Asli Ozyurek Max Planck Society
Jana M. Iverson
Jana M. Iverson University of Pittsburgh
Meredith L. Rowe
Meredith L. Rowe Harvard University
Howard C. Nusbaum
Howard C. Nusbaum University of Chicago
Sian L. Beilock
Sian L. Beilock Barnard College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying psychology in the USA, you might also explore related fields such as social work. Social work and psychology degrees both prepare students for careers that make a real difference in people's lives, focusing on mental health, advocacy, and community well-being.

One key issue for prospective students is affordability. Fortunately, there are many budget-friendly online options. For instance, the most affordable social work degree programs in Arizona offer a range of flexible options for residents. Similarly, students on the East Coast can review the cheapest social work degrees in Boston for accessible programs in a major hub for education and healthcare.

Exploring opportunities on the West Coast, learners can compare affordable social work degrees in California to find options in a diverse and dynamic environment. In the Midwest, there are tailored choices like the most affordable social work degree programs in Chicago.

Choosing the right online degree and career pathway in psychology or social work depends on your interests, goals, and financial situation. Researching programs that balance cost, flexibility, and accreditation can help you launch a meaningful career in helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Susan Goldin-Meadow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles