World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
115
Citations
60550
World Ranking
4471
National Ranking
167

Richard Grol publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Grol sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 599 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard Grol D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Grol sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

Richard Grol is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed to multiple research areas primarily within health professions, economics, and medicine. Their research spans a range of subfields including general health professions, economics and econometrics, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics of Richard Grol's scholarly work include:

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Healthcare Policy and Management

Richard Grol has published research predominantly in the International Journal of Integrated Care, contributing three papers in recent years. These papers are:

  • "Person-centered Parkinson's care Portrayed" (2022, International Journal of Integrated Care)
  • "Holding still, together" (2022, International Journal of Integrated Care)
  • "Holding still, together - Parkinson's care Portrayed" (2023, International Journal of Integrated Care)

In addition to journal articles, Richard Grol has authored a book published by Radboud University Press eBooks titled Holding still, together. Parkinson in Beeld (2022).

Key frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard Grol include:

  • Michel Wensing
  • Roland Laan
  • Bastiaan R. Bloem
  • Thieme Stap
  • Marten Munneke

Best Publications

  • From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care

    Richard Grol;Jeremy Grimshaw

  • Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.

    Steven H Woolf;Richard Grol;Allen Hutchinson;Martin Eccles

  • What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice.

    Richard Grol;Michel Wensing

  • Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice.

    Richard Grol

  • Substitution of doctors by nurses in primary care

    Miranda Laurant;David Reeves;Rosella Hermens;Jose Braspenning

  • Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Health Care

    Richard Grol;Michel Wensing;Martin Eccles;David Davis

  • Planning and studying improvement in patient care : The use of theoretical perspectives

    Richard P.T.M. Grol;Marije C. Bosch;Marlies E.J.L. Hulscher;Martin P. Eccles

  • Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice

    Richard Grol

  • Improving the Quality of Medical Care: Building Bridges Among Professional Pride, Payer Profit, and Patient Satisfaction

    Richard Grol

  • Improving Patient Care: The Implementation of Change in Clinical Practice

    R Grol;M Wensing;MP Eccles;D Davis

  • Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review

    Loes M T Schouten;Marlies E J L Hulscher;Jannes J E van Everdingen;Robbert Huijsman

  • Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.

    Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards;M. Wensing;Kerenza Hood

  • Implementing guidelines and innovations in general practice: which interventions are effective?

    M Wensing;T van der Weijden;R Grol

  • The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks.

    Glyn Elwyn;Hayley Hutchings;Adrian Edwards;Frances Rapport

  • A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain

    Michel Wensing;Hans Peter Jung;Hans Peter Jung;Jan Mainz;Frede Olesen

  • Evidence-Based Implementation of Evidence-Based Medicine

    Richard Grol;Jeremy Grimshaw

  • Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines.

    Gene Feder;Martin Eccles;Richard Grol;Chris Griffiths

  • Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs

    Jako S. Burgers;Richard Grol;Niek S. Klazinga;Marjukka Mäkelä

  • Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.

    Richard Grol;Michel Wensing;Jan Mainz;Hans Pete Jung

  • Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars

    Glyn Elwyn;Adrian G. Edwards;Richard Gwyn;Richard Grol

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Wensing
Michel Wensing Heidelberg University
Glyn Elwyn
Glyn Elwyn Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen Radboud University
Chris van Weel
Chris van Weel Radboud University
Adrian Edwards
Adrian Edwards Cardiff University
Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Jeremy M. Grimshaw Ottawa Hospital
Martin P Eccles
Martin P Eccles Newcastle University
Lisette Schoonhoven
Lisette Schoonhoven Utrecht University
Onyebuchi A. Arah
Onyebuchi A. Arah University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare degrees can open more flexible career paths for students interested in Medicine but seeking different roles or greater advancement. Online programs make it easier to pursue these options, particularly for working professionals or those needing a more affordable route.

If you are interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing the cheapest online master degree in healthcare administration can offer a cost-effective way to qualify for management roles. Nurses aiming for advanced practice roles may consider enrolling in the best online dnp programs to boost their clinical expertise and job prospects.

For pharmacy careers, accredited online pharmacy programs provide an accessible path to becoming a licensed pharmacist. Those interested in the vital field of health information and medical records management can consider reputable rhit programs online.

By choosing the right online degree, students can balance education, affordability, and career goals, ensuring a solid foundation for a future in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Grol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles