World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 59 1532 1370 736 648 212 19902

Johannes R. Anema publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Johannes R. Anema between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Johannes R. Anema published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2017. 28 of the 288 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2017. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 13 publications
1991 2025

288 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Johannes R. Anema: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 4
2007 6
2008 4
2009 15
2010 17
2011 22
2012 10
2013 18
2014 9
2015 12
2016 22
2017 25
2018 23
2019 9
2020 13
2021 8
2022 17
2023 17
2024 15
2025 13
Total 288
Download as CSV

Johannes R. Anema publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes R. Anema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 212 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 212
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Johannes R. Anema D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes R. Anema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105 59
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Johannes R. Anema is affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center in the United States. Their research work primarily spans the fields of health professions and medicine with a focus on workplace health, employee well-being, and associated medical and social factors.

Their scholarly output includes significant contributions in journals such as the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, BMC Public Health, BMC Psychiatry, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

The main areas of study include:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine

With regard to subfields, the research covers:

  • General Health Professions
  • Surgery
  • Demography
  • Pharmacology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Key topics addressed in their work involve:

  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Johannes R. Anema include:

  • The mediating role of lifestyle in the relationship between shift work, obesity and diabetes (2021) in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
  • Supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work: perspectives of occupational health professionals and organizational representatives (2021) in BMC Public Health
  • Facilitators, barriers and support needs for staying at work with a chronic condition: a focus group study (2020) in BMC Public Health
  • The Implementation of Preventive Health Measures in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises-A Combined Quantitative/Qualitative Study of Its Determinants from the Perspective of Enterprise Representatives (2022) in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Personalised electronic health programme for recovery after major abdominal surgery: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (2023) in The Lancet Digital Health

The researcher frequently collaborates with colleagues such as:

  • Frederieke Schaafsma
  • Maaike A. Huysmans
  • Pieter Coenen
  • Rosanne Schaap
  • Judith A.F. Huirne

Best Publications

  • What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention

    Jan Hartvigsen;Mark J Hancock;Alice Kongsted;Quinette Louw

  • Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions.

    Nadine E Foster;Johannes R Anema;Dan Cherkin;Roger Chou

  • Low back pain: a call for action

    Rachelle Buchbinder;Maurits van Tulder;Birgitta Öberg;Lucíola Menezes Costa

  • Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews.

    Marianne Berkhof;H. Jolanda van Rijssen;H. Jolanda van Rijssen;Antonius J.M. Schellart;Antonius J.M. Schellart;Johannes R. Anema;Johannes R. Anema

  • Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    David Samoocha;David J Bruinvels;Nieke A Elbers;Johannes R Anema

  • A developmental conceptualization of return to work

    Amanda E Young;Richard T Roessler;Radoslaw Wasiak;Kathryn M McPherson

  • Workplace interventions for preventing work disability

    Sandra H van Oostrom;Maurice T Driessen;Henrica C W de Vet;Renée-Louise Franche

  • Physical and psychosocial problems in cancer survivors beyond return to work: a systematic review

    Saskia F. A. Duijts;Saskia F. A. Duijts;Martine P. van Egmond;Martine P. van Egmond;Evelien Spelten;Peter van Muijen;Peter van Muijen

  • The Trend in Total Cost of Back Pain in the Netherlands in the Period 2002 to 2007

    Ludeke C. Lambeek;Maurits W. van Tulder;Ilse C.S. Swinkels;Lando L.J. Koppes

  • Return-to-Work Outcomes Following Work Disability: Stakeholder Motivations, Interests and Concerns

    Amanda E. Young;Radoslaw Wasiak;Richard T. Roessler;Kathryn M. McPherson

  • Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave.

    Myrthe van Vilsteren;Sandra H van Oostrom;Henrica C W de Vet;Renée-Louise Franche

  • Can Cross Country Differences in Return-to-Work After Chronic Occupational Back Pain be Explained? An Exploratory Analysis on Disability Policies in a Six Country Cohort Study

    J. R. Anema;A. J. M. Schellart;J. D. Cassidy;P. Loisel

  • The effectiveness of physical and organisational ergonomic interventions on low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review

    M.T. Driessen;K.I. Proper;M.W. van Tulder;J.R. Anema

  • Handbook of Work Disability

    Patrick Loisel;Johannes R. Anema

  • Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta‐analysis

    Yvonne B Suijkerbuijk;Frederieke G Schaafsma;Frederieke G Schaafsma;Joost C van Mechelen;Anneli Ojajärvi

  • Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: results from an internet-based national survey on hearing.

    Janneke Nachtegaal;Dirk J Kuik;Johannes R Anema;S Theo Goverts

  • A workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with distress: results of a randomised controlled trial.

    S.H. van Oostrom;W. van Mechelen;B. Terluin;H.C.W. de Vet

  • Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

    L.C. Lambeek;J.E. Bosmans;B.J. van Royen;M.W. van Tulder

  • Development of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with stress-related mental disorders: Intervention Mapping as a useful tool

    Sandra H van Oostrom;Sandra H van Oostrom;Johannes R Anema;Berend Terluin;Anita Venema

  • Measuring Return to Work

    Unknown

  • Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick leave due to low back pain

    Ivan A. Steenstra;Johannes R. Anema;Maurits W. van Tulder;Maurits W. van Tulder;Paulien M. Bongers;Paulien M. Bongers

  • Medical care of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems: a cohort study to describe and compare the care of the occupational physician and the general practitioner.

    J. R. Anema;K. Jettinghoff;I. Houtman;C. G. Schoemaker

  • Back pain and work

    Kátia M. Costa-Black;Patrick Loisel;Johannes R. Anema;Glenn Pransky

  • Work-related disease in general practice: a systematic review.

    Harm-Jan A Weevers;Allard J van der Beek;Johannes R Anema;Gerrit van der Wal

  • Integrated, multidisciplinary care for hand eczema: design of a randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness study

    Robin F. van Gils;Pieter G. M. van der Valk;Derk Bruynzeel;Pieter J. Coenraads

Frequent Co-Authors

Allard J. van der Beek
Allard J. van der Beek Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Willem van Mechelen
Willem van Mechelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk L. Knol
Dirk L. Knol VU University Medical Center
Aartjan T.F. Beekman
Aartjan T.F. Beekman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Judith E. Bosmans
Judith E. Bosmans Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Thomas Rustemeyer
Thomas Rustemeyer University of Amsterdam
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Social Sciences or Humanities degree in the USA can open the door to a range of diverse and rewarding career options. Many students are now exploring flexible education formats, such as 1 year master's programs online. These programs allow for rapid advancement and a faster transition into specialized fields.

If you’re seeking to speed up your undergraduate education, accelerated degree programs offer a way to finish your studies in less time, saving both money and effort. Such pathways are ideal for motivated learners eager to enter the workforce or pursue advanced roles sooner.

For those considering people-oriented professions, particularly in social work, there are numerous online MSW programs designed for affordability and flexibility. Similarly, those interested in behavioral analysis can benefit from bcba programs that prepare graduates for critical roles in education, healthcare, and community services.

By choosing from these innovative online programs, you can chart a personalized education and career path that fits your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes R. Anema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles