World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17620 16562 662 640 435 21569

Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen between 1993 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen published across 32 years, from 1993 to 2024, averaging 19.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2018. 3 of the 615 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2018. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 26 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 50 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 54 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1993 2024

615 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen: publications per year, 1993 to 2024
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 4
1995 5
1996 3
1997 3
1998 1
1999 4
2000 20
2001 7
2002 11
2003 19
2004 25
2005 26
2006 12
2007 25
2008 23
2009 26
2010 27
2011 37
2012 50
2013 23
2014 34
2015 36
2016 39
2017 35
2018 54
2019 26
2020 17
2021 14
2022 4
2023 2
2024 1
Total 615
Download as CSV

Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 435 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 435
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and health professions, focusing especially on workplace health, cancer survivorship, and occupational safety.

The primary fields of study of this researcher include:

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions

Within these fields, they work in several subfields:

  • General Health Professions
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

The main research topics covered are:

  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research

Frings-Dresen has published multiple recent papers including:

  • "Work-related psychosocial risk factors for stress-related mental disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis" (2020, BMJ Open)
  • "The prevalence of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury" (2020, Environment International)
  • "The effect of occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors on osteoarthritis of hip or knee and selected other musculoskeletal diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury" (2021, Environment International)
  • "Supporting employers to enhance the return to work of cancer survivors: development of a web-based intervention (MiLES intervention)" (2020, Journal of Cancer Survivorship)
  • "Long-term employment status and quality of life after cancer: A longitudinal prospective cohort study from diagnosis up to and including 5 years post diagnosis" (2020, Work)

The researcher frequently publishes in several venues, including:

  • Work
  • Tijdschrift voor bedrijfs- en verzekeringsgeneeskunde
  • Environment International
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Angela G. E. M. de Boer
  • Sietske J. Tamminga
  • Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
  • M. A. Greidanus
  • Angelique de Rijk

Best Publications

  • Reliability and validity of instruments measuring job satisfaction—a systematic review

    N. van Saane;Judith K. Sluiter;J. H.A.M. Verbeek;M. H.W. Frings-Dresen

  • Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review

    K. Nieuwenhuijsen;D.J. Bruinvels;M. Frings-Dresen

  • The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature

    Einar M De Croon;Judith K Sluiter;P Paul F M Kuijer;Monique H W Frings-Dresen

  • Test-retest reliability of the Work Ability Index questionnaire.

    B C H de Zwart;M H W Frings-Dresen;J C van Duivenbooden

  • Need for recovery from work related fatigue and its role in the development and prediction of subjective health complaints.

    J.K Sluiter;E.M de Croon;T.F. Meijman;M.H.W. Frings-Dresen

  • Interventions to enhance return‐to‐work for cancer patients

    Angela Gem E.M. de Boer;Tyna K. Taskila;Sietske J. Tamminga;Michael Feuerstein

  • Considerations of circadian impact for defining 'shift work' in cancer studies: IARC working group report

    Richard G. Stevens;Johnni Hansen;Giovanni Costa;Erhard Haus

  • The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: a study on coach drivers.

    J. K. Sluiter;A. J. Van Der Beek;M. H. W. Frings-Dresen

  • Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology

    A.J. van der Beek;M.H.W. Frings-Dresen

  • How many people return to work after acquired brain injury?: a systematic review

    J. M. van Velzen;C. A. M. van Bennekom;M. J. A. Edelaar;Judith K. Sluiter

  • The effect of lifting during work on low-back pain – a health impact assessment based on a meta-analysis

    Pieter Coenen;Vincent Gouttebarge;Aafje S A M van der Burght;Jaap H van Dieën

  • Fear of movement and (re)injury in chronic musculoskeletal pain: Evidence for an invariant two-factor model of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia across pain diagnoses and Dutch, Swedish, and Canadian samples

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Judith K. Sluiter;Monique H.W. Frings-Dresen;Mariëlle Goossens

  • Determinants of work ability and its predictive value for disability

    S. M. Alavinia;A. G. E. M. de Boer;J. C. van Duivenbooden;M. H. W. Frings-Dresen

  • Pushing and pulling in relation to musculoskeletal disorders: a review of risk factors

    M. J. M. Hoozemans;A. J. Van Der Beek;M. H. W. Frings-Dresen;F. J. H. Van Dijk

  • Factors associated with long-term sick leave in sick-listed employees: a systematic review.

    Patricia M. Dekkers-Sanchez;Jan L. Hoving;Judith K. Sluiter;Monique H.W. Frings-Dresen

  • Predictive factors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review

    E M de Croon;J K Sluiter;T F Nijssen;B A C Dijkmans

  • Epidemiologic evidence on manual materials handling as a risk factor for back disorders:a systematic review

    Judith I. Kuiper;Alex Burdorf;Jos H.A.M. Verbeek;Monique H.W. Frings-Dresen

  • Need for recovery after work predicts sickness absence: a 2-year prospective cohort study in truck drivers.

    Einar M de Croon;Judith K Sluiter;Monique H.W Frings-Dresen

  • The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status

    Judith K. Sluiter;Monique H.W. Frings-Dresen;Allard J. van der Beek;Theo F. Meijman

  • Musculoskeletal disorders among construction workers: a one-year follow-up study

    Julitta S Boschman;Henk F van der Molen;Judith K Sluiter;Monique Hw Frings-Dresen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jaap H. van Dieën
Jaap H. van Dieën Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Alex Burdorf
Alex Burdorf Erasmus University Rotterdam
Idsart Kingma
Idsart Kingma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Roland W. B. Blonk
Roland W. B. Blonk Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Peter Vink
Peter Vink Delft University of Technology
Thomas Rustemeyer
Thomas Rustemeyer University of Amsterdam
Paul P. Tak
Paul P. Tak GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom)
Johan W. Groothoff
Johan W. Groothoff University Medical Center Groningen
Peter Prinzie
Peter Prinzie Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA opens many alternative and supportive pathways beyond traditional medicine degrees. With evolving healthcare demands, many opt for flexible, online programs that offer entry to in-demand medical fields.

Roles like health informatics specialists are crucial in managing patient data and improving healthcare systems. To get started, consider some of the health informatics programs available online.

Medical billing and coding is another essential area, providing vast employment opportunities in hospitals and clinics. You can find accessible billing and coding classes online for a fast track into this sector.

If your career goal is nursing, there are also affordable routes like the cheapest np programs online for becoming a nurse practitioner, as well as cheapest rn to bsn online programs to advance registered nurses to the next level.

Pursuing these alternative online health degrees not only offers flexibility, but also leads to stable, rewarding healthcare roles in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles