World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
122
Citations
53600
World Ranking
3484
National Ranking
131

Willem van Mechelen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem van Mechelen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 559 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Willem van Mechelen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willem van Mechelen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Willem van Mechelen is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily involves the intersection of physical activity, occupational health, and related health outcomes across multiple fields including Medicine, Health Professions, and Psychology.

Van Mechelen's work spans several subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding health and physical activity in both general and occupational settings.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Sports Injuries and Prevention
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Sleep and Related Disorders

Significant recent publications by van Mechelen cover a range of health-related issues. These include:

  • How does occupational physical activity influence health? An umbrella review of 23 health outcomes across 158 observational studies, 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Physical activity at work may not be health enhancing. A systematic review with meta-analysis on the association between occupational physical activity and cardiovascular disease mortality covering 23 studies with 655,892 participants, 2021, Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • The mediating role of lifestyle in the relationship between shift work, obesity and diabetes, 2021, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
  • Epidemiology of Injury and Illness Among Trail Runners: A Systematic Review, 2021, Sports Medicine
  • Towards a better understanding of the 'physical activity paradox': the need for a research agenda, 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine

Van Mechelen frequently publishes in several scholarly journals with multiple publications in:

  • British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • Sports Medicine
  • Translational Sports Medicine

Their collaborations include coauthors who have contributed extensively to similar research areas. The most frequent coauthors are:

  • Evert Verhagen
  • Hidde P. van der Ploeg
  • Femke van Nassau
  • Rienk Dekker
  • Judith G. M. Jelsma

Best Publications

  • The economic burden of physical inactivity : a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases

    Ding Ding;Ding Ding;Kenny D Lawson;Kenny D Lawson;Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander;Tracy L Kolbe-Alexander;Eric A Finkelstein

  • A brief review on correlates of physical activity and sedentariness in youth

    Klazine Van Der Horst;Marijke J Chin A Paw;Jos W R Twisk;Willem Van Mechelen

  • Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment.

    Amika Singh;Léonie Uijtdewilligen;Jos W. R. Twisk;Willem van Mechelen

  • The Effect of a Proprioceptive Balance Board Training Program for the Prevention of Ankle Sprains A Prospective Controlled Trial

    Evert Verhagen;Allard van der Beek;Jos Twisk;Lex Bouter

  • Sedentary Behaviors and Health Outcomes Among Adults A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies

    Karin I. Proper;Amika S. Singh;Willem van Mechelen;Mai J.M. Chinapaw

  • Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties.

    Mireille N. M. van Poppel;Mai J. M. Chinapaw;Lidwine B. Mokkink;Willem van Mechelen

  • International Olympic Committee consensus statement on youth athletic development

    Michael F Bergeron;Margo Mountjoy;Neil Armstrong;Michael Chia

  • Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: A dual-process view.

    Stef P J Kremers;Gert-Jan de Bruijn;Tommy L S Visscher;Willem van Mechelen

  • Effect of school based physical activity programme (KISS) on fitness and adiposity in primary schoolchildren: cluster randomised controlled trial.

    Susi Kriemler;Lukas Zahner;Christian Schindler;Ursina Meyer

  • Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer : An individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs

    Laurien M. Buffart;Joeri Kalter;Maike G. Sweegers;Kerry S. Courneya

  • The effectiveness of worksite physical activity programs on physical activity, physical fitness, and health

    Karin I Proper;Marjan Koning;Allard J van der Beek;Vincent H Hildebrandt

  • Worksite health promotion programs with environmental changes: a systematic review.

    Luuk H Engbers;Mireille N M van Poppel;Marijke J M Chin A Paw;Willem van Mechelen

  • Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness Without Performing Exercise Testing

    Radim Jurca;Andrew S. Jackson;Michael J. LaMonte;James R. Morrow

  • Visiting green space is associated with mental health and vitality: A cross-sectional study in four european cities.

    Magdalena van den Berg;Mireille van Poppel;Mireille van Poppel;Irene van Kamp;Sandra Andrusaityte

  • Physical and psychosocial benefits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Laurien M Buffart;Jannique G. Z Van Uffelen;Jannique G. Z Van Uffelen;Ingrid Riphagen;Johannes Brug

  • Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties

    Mai J M Chinapaw;Lidwine B Mokkink;Mireille N M van Poppel;Willem van Mechelen

  • Workplace interventions for preventing work disability

    Sandra H van Oostrom;Maurice T Driessen;Henrica C W de Vet;Renée-Louise Franche

  • Design of a RCT evaluating the (cost-) effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for male construction workers at risk for cardiovascular disease: the health under construction study.

    Iris F Groeneveld;Iris F Groeneveld;Karin I Proper;Karin I Proper;Allard J van der Beek;Allard J van der Beek;Cor van Duivenbooden

  • Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life

    L.C. Lambeek;W. van Mechelen;D.L. Knol;P. Loisel

  • Effect of unsupervised home based proprioceptive training on recurrences of ankle sprain: randomised controlled trial

    Maarten D W Hupperets;Evert A L M Verhagen;Willem van Mechelen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC
Allard J. van der Beek
Allard J. van der Beek Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Johannes R. Anema
Johannes R. Anema Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Maurits W. van Tulder
Maurits W. van Tulder Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Henrica C.W. de Vet
Henrica C.W. de Vet University of Amsterdam
Dirk L. Knol
Dirk L. Knol VU University Medical Center
Coen D.A. Stehouwer
Coen D.A. Stehouwer Maastricht University
Jacob C. Seidell
Jacob C. Seidell Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anja C. Huizink
Anja C. Huizink Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about healthcare, there are many online options to help launch or advance your career. In the US, pursuing nursing degrees online is becoming more popular due to flexibility, accessibility, and cost-saving benefits.

If you’re aiming to become a nurse practitioner, exploring the cheapest np school options can help reduce student debt and speed up your path to clinical practice. Registered nurses looking to earn a bachelor’s degree may want to consider the cheapest rn to bsn online programs, which are tailored for working nurses.

For those interested in advanced practice or leadership, research the cheapest dnp programs online to find affordable tracks for a terminal nursing degree. Curious about overall costs? Discover what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online for your next step in the nursing field.

These diverse online degree pathways support varied healthcare careers, from bedside care to research and healthcare management—offering students the chance to learn at their own pace while keeping costs manageable.

Best Scientists Citing Willem van Mechelen

Trending Scientists