World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
14691
World Ranking
3272
National Ranking
1519

Adam R. Ferguson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam R. Ferguson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 232 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Adam R. Ferguson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam R. Ferguson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam R. Ferguson is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research focus primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to various subfields including Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins

Frequent publication venues for Adam R. Ferguson include:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Neurology

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Geoffrey T. Manley
  • Abel Torres-Espín
  • John K. Yue
  • David O. Okonkwo
  • J. Russell Huie

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Adam R. Ferguson comprise:

  • Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study (2021, JAMA Neurology)
  • The evolution of white matter microstructural changes after mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal DTI and NODDI study (2020, Science Advances)
  • Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score (2021, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study (2021, JAMA Network Open)

Best Publications

  • Extensive spontaneous plasticity of corticospinal projections after primate spinal cord injury

    Ephron S Rosenzweig;Gregoire Courtine;Gregoire Courtine;Devin L Jindrich;John H Brock

  • Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury

    Esther L. Yuh;Pratik Mukherjee;Hester F. Lingsma;John K. Yue

  • Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients Presenting to US Level I Trauma Centers: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Study.

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Nancy R. Temkin;Sureyya Dikmen;Jason Barber

  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study

    Michael A McCrea;Joseph T Giacino;Joseph T Giacino;Jason Barber;Nancy R Temkin

  • Restorative effects of human neural stem cell grafts on the primate spinal cord

    Ephron S Rosenzweig;John H Brock;John H Brock;Paul Lu;Paul Lu;Hiromi Kumamaru

  • Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis

    Yury P. Gerasimenko;Yury P. Gerasimenko;Daniel C. Lu;Morteza Modaber;Sharon Zdunowski

  • Topological data analysis for discovery in preclinical spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury

    Jessica L. Nielson;Jesse Paquette;Aiwen W. Liu;Cristian F. Guandique

  • Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression in Civilian Patients After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

    Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein;Sonia Jain;Joseph T. Giacino;Joseph T. Giacino;Harvey Levin

  • Cell Death after Spinal Cord Injury Is Exacerbated by Rapid TNFα-Induced Trafficking of GluR2-Lacking AMPARs to the Plasma Membrane

    Adam R. Ferguson;Randolph N. Christensen;John C. Gensel;Brandon A. Miller;Brandon A. Miller

  • CCR2 Antagonism Alters Brain Macrophage Polarization and Ameliorates Cognitive Dysfunction Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury

    Josh M. Morganti;Timothy D. Jopson;Sharon Liu;Lara-Kirstie Riparip

  • Big data from small data: data-sharing in the 'long tail' of neuroscience

    Adam R Ferguson;Jessica L Nielson;Melissa H Cragin;Anita E Bandrowski

  • Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Correlates with Neurological Recovery after Human Spinal Cord Injury: Analysis of High Frequency Physiologic Data

    Gregory Hawryluk;William Whetstone;Rajiv Saigal;Adam Ferguson

  • Application of 3D Printing for Smart Objects with Embedded Electronic Sensors and Systems

    Hiroki Ota;Hiroki Ota;Sam Emaminejad;Yuji Gao;Allan Zhao

  • Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury

    Dimitry G Sayenko;Mrinal Rath;Adam R Ferguson;Joel W Burdick

  • Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study.

    John K. Yue;Esther L. Yuh;Frederick K. Korley;Ethan A. Winkler

  • Pronounced species divergence in corticospinal tract reorganization and functional recovery after lateralized spinal cord injury favors primates

    Lucia Friedli;Ephron S. Rosenzweig;Quentin Barraud;Martin Schubert

  • The Brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings

    Jason F. Talbott;William D. Whetstone;William J. Readdy;Adam R. Ferguson

  • Assessment of Follow-up Care After Emergency Department Presentation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion: Results From the TRACK-TBI Study.

    Seth A. Seabury;Étienne Gaudette;Dana P. Goldman;Amy J. Markowitz

  • The evolution of white matter microstructural changes after mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal DTI and NODDI study

    E. M. Palacios;J. P. Owen;E. L. Yuh;E. L. Yuh;M. B. Wang

  • Translational Stroke Research: Vision and Opportunities

    Francesca Bosetti;James I. Koenig;Cenk Ayata;Stephen A. Back

  • BDNF and learning: Evidence that instrumental training promotes learning within the spinal cord by up-regulating BDNF expression.

    F. Gómez-Pinilla;J.R. Huie;Z. Ying;A.R. Ferguson

  • Instrumental learning within the spinal cord. II. Evidence for central mediation.

    Eric D Crown;Adam R Ferguson;Robin L Joynes;James W Grau

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey T. Manley
Geoffrey T. Manley University of California, San Francisco
Michael S. Beattie
Michael S. Beattie University of California, San Francisco
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan University of California, San Francisco
Pratik Mukherjee
Pratik Mukherjee University of California, San Francisco
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh
James W. Grau
James W. Grau Texas A&M University
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia University of Pennsylvania
Jonathan Rosand
Jonathan Rosand Harvard University
Mark H. Tuszynski
Mark H. Tuszynski University of California, San Diego
Kevin K. W. Wang
Kevin K. W. Wang Morehouse School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Adam R. Ferguson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles