World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 64 3272 2991 1519 1371 232 14691

Adam R. Ferguson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam R. Ferguson between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam R. Ferguson published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2023. 48 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2023. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 27 publications
2001 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam R. Ferguson: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 2
2006 2
2007 5
2008 2
2009 0
2010 3
2011 1
2012 10
2013 6
2014 9
2015 16
2016 18
2017 20
2018 15
2019 21
2020 23
2021 31
2022 20
2023 32
2024 21
2025 27
Total 295
Download as CSV

Adam R. Ferguson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam R. Ferguson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 232 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220 232
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam R. Ferguson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam R. Ferguson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278 64
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Adam R. Ferguson is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research focus primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to various subfields including Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins

Frequent publication venues for Adam R. Ferguson include:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Neurology

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Geoffrey T. Manley
  • Abel Torres-Espín
  • John K. Yue
  • David O. Okonkwo
  • J. Russell Huie

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Adam R. Ferguson comprise:

  • Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research (2022, The Lancet Neurology)
  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study (2021, JAMA Neurology)
  • The evolution of white matter microstructural changes after mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal DTI and NODDI study (2020, Science Advances)
  • Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score (2021, Journal of Neurotrauma)
  • Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study (2021, JAMA Network Open)

Best Publications

  • Extensive spontaneous plasticity of corticospinal projections after primate spinal cord injury

    Ephron S Rosenzweig;Gregoire Courtine;Gregoire Courtine;Devin L Jindrich;John H Brock

  • Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury

    Esther L. Yuh;Pratik Mukherjee;Hester F. Lingsma;John K. Yue

  • Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients Presenting to US Level I Trauma Centers: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Study.

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Nancy R. Temkin;Sureyya Dikmen;Jason Barber

  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study

    Michael A McCrea;Joseph T Giacino;Joseph T Giacino;Jason Barber;Nancy R Temkin

  • Restorative effects of human neural stem cell grafts on the primate spinal cord

    Ephron S Rosenzweig;John H Brock;John H Brock;Paul Lu;Paul Lu;Hiromi Kumamaru

  • Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis

    Yury P. Gerasimenko;Yury P. Gerasimenko;Daniel C. Lu;Morteza Modaber;Sharon Zdunowski

  • Topological data analysis for discovery in preclinical spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury

    Jessica L. Nielson;Jesse Paquette;Aiwen W. Liu;Cristian F. Guandique

  • Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression in Civilian Patients After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

    Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein;Sonia Jain;Joseph T. Giacino;Joseph T. Giacino;Harvey Levin

  • Cell Death after Spinal Cord Injury Is Exacerbated by Rapid TNFα-Induced Trafficking of GluR2-Lacking AMPARs to the Plasma Membrane

    Adam R. Ferguson;Randolph N. Christensen;John C. Gensel;Brandon A. Miller;Brandon A. Miller

  • CCR2 Antagonism Alters Brain Macrophage Polarization and Ameliorates Cognitive Dysfunction Induced by Traumatic Brain Injury

    Josh M. Morganti;Timothy D. Jopson;Sharon Liu;Lara-Kirstie Riparip

  • Big data from small data: data-sharing in the 'long tail' of neuroscience

    Adam R Ferguson;Jessica L Nielson;Melissa H Cragin;Anita E Bandrowski

  • Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Correlates with Neurological Recovery after Human Spinal Cord Injury: Analysis of High Frequency Physiologic Data

    Gregory Hawryluk;William Whetstone;Rajiv Saigal;Adam Ferguson

  • Application of 3D Printing for Smart Objects with Embedded Electronic Sensors and Systems

    Hiroki Ota;Hiroki Ota;Sam Emaminejad;Yuji Gao;Allan Zhao

  • Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury

    Dimitry G Sayenko;Mrinal Rath;Adam R Ferguson;Joel W Burdick

  • Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study.

    John K. Yue;Esther L. Yuh;Frederick K. Korley;Ethan A. Winkler

  • Pronounced species divergence in corticospinal tract reorganization and functional recovery after lateralized spinal cord injury favors primates

    Lucia Friedli;Ephron S. Rosenzweig;Quentin Barraud;Martin Schubert

  • The Brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings

    Jason F. Talbott;William D. Whetstone;William J. Readdy;Adam R. Ferguson

  • Assessment of Follow-up Care After Emergency Department Presentation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion: Results From the TRACK-TBI Study.

    Seth A. Seabury;Étienne Gaudette;Dana P. Goldman;Amy J. Markowitz

  • The evolution of white matter microstructural changes after mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal DTI and NODDI study

    E. M. Palacios;J. P. Owen;E. L. Yuh;E. L. Yuh;M. B. Wang

  • Translational Stroke Research: Vision and Opportunities

    Francesca Bosetti;James I. Koenig;Cenk Ayata;Stephen A. Back

  • BDNF and learning: Evidence that instrumental training promotes learning within the spinal cord by up-regulating BDNF expression.

    F. Gómez-Pinilla;J.R. Huie;Z. Ying;A.R. Ferguson

  • Instrumental learning within the spinal cord. II. Evidence for central mediation.

    Eric D Crown;Adam R Ferguson;Robin L Joynes;James W Grau

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey T. Manley
Geoffrey T. Manley University of California, San Francisco
Michael S. Beattie
Michael S. Beattie University of California, San Francisco
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan University of California, San Francisco
Pratik Mukherjee
Pratik Mukherjee University of California, San Francisco
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh
James W. Grau
James W. Grau Texas A&M University
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia University of Pennsylvania
Jonathan Rosand
Jonathan Rosand Harvard University
Mark H. Tuszynski
Mark H. Tuszynski University of California, San Diego
Kevin K. W. Wang
Kevin K. W. Wang Morehouse School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Adam R. Ferguson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles