World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
8145
World Ranking
10358
National Ranking
5435

R. Scott Tindale publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Scott Tindale sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

R. Scott Tindale D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. Scott Tindale sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. Scott Tindale is affiliated with Loyola University Chicago in the United States, with a research focus mainly in the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work spans five publications that cover diverse subfields including Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Law, Sociology and Political Science, and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • Information aggregation and collective intelligence beyond the wisdom of crowds, 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • A social sharedness interpretation of the January 6th U.S. capitol insurrection, 2022, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
  • Epistemic motivation facilitates advice seeking and utilization by groups, 2023, Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • May we take the test as a group? Examining group processes and member learning in a collaborative testing environment, 2023, Active Learning in Higher Education
  • Jury Decision-Making, 2023, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology

The main topics covered in Tindale's research feature an interdisciplinary approach, with an emphasis on:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Language and cultural evolution
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated with Tindale, including:

  • Christine M. Smith
  • Tatsuya Kameda
  • Wataru Toyokawa
  • Rayne Bozeman
  • Robyn K. Mallett

Publications by Tindale have appeared in notable venues such as:

  • Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Active Learning in Higher Education
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice
  • Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology

Thematically, Tindale's work intersects prominent issues in group processes, collective decision-making, and learning environments. The research encompasses both theoretical and applied perspectives, often addressing how groups aggregate information, utilize advice, and function in educational and social contexts. This contribution spans psychological and social science disciplines, reflecting a multidisciplinary investigative approach.

Best Publications

  • Group performance and decision making.

    Norbert L. Kerr;R. Scott Tindale

  • The Emerging Conceptualization of Groups as Information Processors

    Verlin B. Hinsz;R. Scott Tindale;David A. Vollrath

  • Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview.

    Regina Pingitore;Bernard L. Dugoni;R. Scott Tindale;Bonnie Spring

  • Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

    Michael A. Hogg;R. Scott Tindale

  • 'Social Sharedness' as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups

    R. Scott Tindale;Tatsuya Kameda

  • Group Decision-Making

    R. Scott Tindale;Jeremy R. Winget

  • Shared Representations and Asymmetric Social Influence Processes in Small Groups

    R. Scott Tindale;Christine M. Smith;Linda S. Thomas;Joseph Filkins

  • Theory and research on small groups

    R. Scott Tindale;Linda Heath;John Edwards;Emil J. Posavac

  • Social sharing and risk reduction: Exploring a computational algorithm for the psychology of windfall gains

    Tatsuya Kameda;Masanori Takezawa;R.Scott Tindale;Christine M Smith

  • Shared Information, Cognitive Load, and Group Memory:

    R. Scott Tindale;Susan Sheffey

  • Group-based forecasting?: A social psychological analysis

    Norbert L. Kerr;Norbert L. Kerr;R. Scott Tindale

  • Group vs Individual Performance in Mixed-Motive Situations: Exploring an Inconsistency

    Pauline M Morgan;R.Scott Tindale

  • Reasons for the trend toward null findings in research on Type A behavior.

    Todd Q. Miller;Charles W. Turner;R. Scott Tindale;Emil J. Posavac

  • Abuse Characteristics and Coping Resources as Predictors of Problem-Focused Coping Strategies Among Battered Women

    Chiara Sabina;R. Scott Tindale

  • Group vs individual information processing: The effects of outcome feedback on decision making.

    R.Scott Tindale

  • Shared cognition in small groups

    R. Scott Tindale;Helen M. Meisenhelder;Amanda A. Dykema‐Engblade;Michael A. Hogg

  • Decision errors made by individuals and groups.

    R. Scott Tindale

  • Framing and Group Decision-Making: Do Cognitive Changes Parallel Preference Changes?

    R.Scott Tindale;Susan Sheffey;Leslie A. Scott

  • The influence of the accuracy of individuating information on the use of base rate information in probability judgment

    Verlin B Hinsz;R.Scott Tindale;Dennis H Nagao;James H Davis

  • Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research: Cognitions, Preferences, and Social Sharedness: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Group Decision Making

    Tatsuya Kameda;R. Scott Tindale;James H. Davis

  • Decisional and behavioral procrastination: How they relate to self-discrepancies.

    Lucía E. Orellana-Damacela;R. Scott Tindale;Yolanda Suárez-Balcázar

Frequent Co-Authors

Verlin B. Hinsz
Verlin B. Hinsz North Dakota State University
Norbert L. Kerr
Norbert L. Kerr Michigan State University
Tatsuya Kameda
Tatsuya Kameda Meiji Gakuin University
Linda S. Heath
Linda S. Heath US Forest Service
Michael A. Hogg
Michael A. Hogg Claremont Graduate University
Fred B. Bryant
Fred B. Bryant Loyola University Chicago
Yoshihisa Kashima
Yoshihisa Kashima University of Melbourne
Lowell Gaertner
Lowell Gaertner University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Carol T. Kulik
Carol T. Kulik University of South Australia
Gerd Bohner
Gerd Bohner Bielefeld University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens up a range of online education and career pathways. One popular route is to become a marriage and family therapist (MFT), an in-demand career that requires a blend of specialized knowledge, clinical training, and state licensure. Requirements for becoming an MFT often include earning a relevant graduate degree and completing supervised hours, though these specifics can vary by location.

For example, those considering how to become a marriage and family therapist in Houston must meet Texas state requirements, while individuals interested in how to become a marriage and family therapist in Huntsville will follow a similar but locally tailored process. Students looking at Indianapolis MFT certification requirements must meet Indiana’s specific licensing standards. If you’re considering the West Coast, you can learn more about how to become an MFT in Irvine.

Online psychology degrees can provide the flexibility and foundational knowledge needed for these diverse careers, making them a strong option for those aiming for client-facing roles in mental health and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing R. Scott Tindale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles