World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5580 5181 263 259 193 13756

Gerd Bohner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerd Bohner between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerd Bohner published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2010. 5 of the 223 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2010. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1988 2025

223 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerd Bohner: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 2
1990 2
1991 5
1992 7
1993 4
1994 7
1995 4
1996 3
1997 2
1998 7
1999 2
2000 4
2001 6
2002 6
2003 5
2004 4
2005 6
2006 9
2007 8
2008 8
2009 7
2010 14
2011 13
2012 10
2013 12
2014 10
2015 6
2016 5
2017 7
2018 6
2019 4
2020 8
2021 6
2022 5
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 223
Download as CSV

Gerd Bohner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerd Bohner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 193 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 193
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gerd Bohner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerd Bohner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gerd Bohner is affiliated with Bielefeld University in Germany and has contributed extensively to research within the social sciences. Their body of work spans several interrelated fields and subfields, including gender studies, sociology and political science, social psychology, health, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research primarily addresses topics such as social and intergroup psychology, sexual assault and victimization studies, cultural differences and values, intimate partner and family violence, behavioral health and interventions, sex work and related issues, and gender, feminism, and media.

Among notable recent publications are:

  • "Ladies First: Gender Stereotypes Drive Anticipatory Eye-Movements During Incremental Sentence Interpretation" (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Ambivalent Stereotypes and Persuasion: Attitudinal Effects of Warmth vs. Competence Ascribed to Message Sources" (2022), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "AMMSA-21: a revised version of the Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression Scale in English, German, Polish and Spanish (AMMSA-21: una versión revisada de la escala Aceptación de Mitos Modernos sobre la Agresión Sexual en inglés, alemán, polaco y español)" (2022), International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
  • "A Russian Version of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale: Validation with a Female Online Sample" (2020), Psychology in Russia State of Art
  • "Do Biospheric Values Moderate the Impact of Information Appeals on Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions?" (2024), Sustainability

Gerd Bohner frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Roman Linne, Tina Glaser, Jesús L. Megías, Ronja M. J. Boege, and Alexa Weiß.

Their work has been published repeatedly in several venues, such as:

  • International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld)
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Social Cognition

Best Publications

  • Attitudes and Attitude Change

    Gerd Bohner;Nina Dickel

  • Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis.

    Herbert Bless;Gerd Bohner;Norbert Schwarz;Fritz Strack

  • Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity.

    Dominic Abrams;G. Tendayi Viki;Barbara Masser;Gerd Bohner

  • Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications

    Norbert Schwarz;Herbert Bless;Gerd Bohner

  • The Construction of Attitudes

    Norbert Schwarz;Gerd Bohner

  • The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: development and validation in German and English

    Heike Gerger;Hanna Kley;Gerd Bohner;Frank Siebler

  • The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information

    Gerd Bohner;Gordon B. Moskowitz;Shelly Chaiken

  • Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions : evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping

    Gerd Bohner;Marc-André Reinhard;Stefanie Rutz;Sabine Sturm

  • What triggers causal attributions? The impact of valence and subjective probability.

    Gerd Bohner;Herbert Bless;Norbert Schwarz;Fritz Strack

  • There Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes?

    Michaela Wänke;Gerd Bohner;Andreas Jurkowitsch

  • Social Norms and the Likelihood of Raping: Perceived Rape Myth Acceptance of Others Affects Men's Rape Proclivity

    Gerd Bohner;Frank Siebler;Jürgen Schmelcher

  • Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality.

    Gerald Echterhoff;E. Tory Higgins;Stephan Groll

  • Need for cognition: eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben

    Herbert Bless;Roland F. Fellhauer;Gerd Bohner;Norbert Schwarz

  • Need for cognition: eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben: Need for cognition: a scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks

    Herbert Bless;Michaela Wänke;Gerd Bohner;Roland F. Fellhauer

  • Rape myth acceptance: cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator

    Gerd Bohner;Friederike Eyssel;Afroditi Pina;Frank Siebler

  • The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men

    Gerd Bohner;Christopher I. Jarvis;Friederike Anne Eyssel;Frank Siebler

  • Affect and persuasion: mood effects on the processing of message content and context cues and on subsequent behaviour

    Gerd Bohner;Kimberly Crow;Hans-Peter Erb;Norbert Schwarz

  • Feelings and their motivational implications: Moods and the action sequence

    Norbert Schwarz;Gerd Bohner

  • Accuracy Motivation, Consensus Information, and the Law of Large Numbers: Effects on Attitude Judgment in the Absence of Argumentation

    Peter R. Darke;Shelly Chaiken;Gerd Bohner;Sabine Einwiller

  • The role of mood and message ambiguity in the interplay of heuristic and systematic processing

    Gerd Bohner;Gerd Bohner;Shelly Chaiken;Piroska Hunyadi

  • Protecting self-esteem from stigma: A test of different strategies for coping with the stigma of mental illness:

    Marie Ilic;Jost Reinecke;Gerd Bohner;Hans-Onno Röttgers

  • Attitudes and attitude change

    Gerd Bohner

Frequent Co-Authors

Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Herbert Bless
Herbert Bless University of Mannheim
Michaela Wänke
Michaela Wänke University of Mannheim
Sabine Einwiller
Sabine Einwiller University of Vienna
Roberto González
Roberto González Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Martin Driessen
Martin Driessen Bielefeld University
Patrick W. Corrigan
Patrick W. Corrigan Illinois Institute of Technology
Shelly Chaiken
Shelly Chaiken New York University
Fritz Strack
Fritz Strack University of Würzburg
Bärbel Knäuper
Bärbel Knäuper McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a range of flexible learning options and diverse career pathways. Accredited online undergraduate programs are available in many states, providing rigorous coursework in areas such as cognitive processes, social interactions, and mental health. For example, the best online psychology bachelor's degree rankings in Pennsylvania highlight institutions offering strong faculty support and industry connections.

Students in other states can review the best online psychology program rankings in California, which feature renowned universities and specialized study tracks. Illinois residents can reference the best online psychology degree rankings in Illinois to find top-rated programs tailored to local workforce needs.

For advanced professionals, earning a doctorate online expands expertise and unlocks opportunities in research, education, or advanced clinical roles. The online psychology doctorate programs in USA showcase leading institutions that offer flexible and credible doctoral pathways. Whether you're starting your journey or aiming for a specialized career, researching online psychology degrees can help you find the best fit for your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Gerd Bohner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles