World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7510 7004 357 351 158 8263

Michaela Wänke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michaela Wänke between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michaela Wänke published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2016. 6 of the 185 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2016. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1989 2025

185 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michaela Wänke: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 5
1995 4
1996 4
1997 4
1998 4
1999 7
2000 4
2001 5
2002 5
2003 3
2004 4
2005 6
2006 3
2007 8
2008 10
2009 10
2010 4
2011 14
2012 7
2013 10
2014 4
2015 4
2016 20
2017 2
2018 2
2019 5
2020 2
2021 4
2022 3
2023 6
2024 1
2025 5
Total 185
Download as CSV

Michaela Wänke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michaela Wänke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 158
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michaela Wänke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michaela Wänke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michaela Wänke is affiliated with the University of Mannheim in Germany. The primary domain of research is psychology, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, sociology and political science, marketing, and applied psychology.

The scientist's research covers several key topics, including:

  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Recent publications by Michaela Wänke include works across multiple journals and years. These papers are:

  • "Truth is in the mind, but beauty is in the eye: Fluency effects are moderated by a match between fluency source and judgment dimension." (2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General)
  • "Brand placements in video games: How local in-game experiences influence brand attitudes" (2022, Psychology and Marketing)
  • "Combining Defaults and Transparency Information to Increase Policy Compliance" (2020, Social Psychology)
  • "Fluency in the in-out effect: The role of structural mere exposure effects" (2020, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology)
  • "When it pays to be clear: the appeal of concrete communication under uncertainty" (2023, International Journal of Advertising)

Michaela Wänke frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • Tobias Vogel
  • Moritz Ingendahl
  • Katharina Theresa Halicki
  • Flavia Gentile
  • Wolfgang Mueller

Publication venues where Michaela Wänke's work appears repeatedly are:

  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Psychology and Marketing
  • Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • When impulses take over: moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour.

    Malte Friese;Wilhelm Hofmann;Michaela Wänke

  • The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect:

    Alice Dechêne;Christoph Stahl;Jochim Hansen;Michaela Wänke

  • Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast

    Fritz Strack;Norbert Schwarz;Herbert Bless;Almut Kübler

  • There Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes?

    Michaela Wänke;Gerd Bohner;Andreas Jurkowitsch

  • Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice

    Malte Friese;Michaela Wänke;Henning Plessner

  • Need for cognition: eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben: Need for cognition: a scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks

    Herbert Bless;Michaela Wänke;Gerd Bohner;Roland F. Fellhauer

  • Effects of Atypical Exemplars on Racial Beliefs: Enlightened Racism or Generalized Appraisals

    Galen V. Bodenhausen;Norbert Schwarz;Herbert Bless;Michaela Wänke

  • Truth From Language and Truth From Fit: The Impact of Linguistic Concreteness and Level of Construal on Subjective Truth

    Jochim Hansen;Michaela Wänke

  • The availability heuristic revisited : experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates

    Michaela Wänke;Norbert Schwarz;Herbert Bless

  • The interaction of endorser attractiveness and involvement in persuasion depends on the goal that guides message processing

    Sharon Shavitt;Suzanne Swan;Tina M. Lowrey;Michaela Wänke

  • Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research

    Fritz Strack;Norbert Schwarz;Michaela Wänke

  • The color red reduces snack food and soft drink intake

    Oliver Genschow;Leonie Reutner;Michaela Wänke

  • Subjective Experience Versus Content of Information in the Construction of Attitude Judgments

    Michaela Wänke;Herbert Bless;Barbara Biller

  • Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth

    Jochim Hansen;Alice Dechêne;Michaela Wänke

  • Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures: the 2002 German parliamentary election.

    Malte Friese;Matthias Bluemke;Michaela Wänke

  • The abstractness of luxury

    Jochim Hansen;Michaela Wänke;Michaela Wänke

  • On the relations between distinct aspects of psychological distance: An ecological basis of construal-level theory ☆

    Klaus Fiedler;Janis Jung;Michaela Wänke;Theodore Alexopoulos

  • Liking What's FamiLiar: the importance oF UnconscioUs FamiLiarity in the mere-exposUre eFFect

    Jochim Hansen;Michaela Wänke

  • Temporal distance and ease of retrieval.

    Stefan M. Herzog;Jochim Hansen;Michaela Wänke

  • Social Psychology of Consumer Behavior

    Michaela Wänke

  • Money and Thinking: Reminders of Money Trigger Abstract Construal and Shape Consumer Judgments

    Jochim Hansen;Florian Kutzner;Michaela Wänke

  • Relative Processing Fluency

    Michaela Wänke;Jochim Hansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert Bless
Herbert Bless University of Mannheim
Norbert Schwarz
Norbert Schwarz University of Southern California
Malte Friese
Malte Friese Saarland University
Gerd Bohner
Gerd Bohner Bielefeld University
Eric R. Igou
Eric R. Igou University of Limerick
Thomas Vetter
Thomas Vetter University of Basel
Sabine Sczesny
Sabine Sczesny University of Bern
Wilhelm Hofmann
Wilhelm Hofmann Ruhr University Bochum
Andreas Herrmann
Andreas Herrmann RWTH Aachen University
Fritz Strack
Fritz Strack University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of related online degrees and diverse career opportunities. Social work is a particularly popular path for psychology graduates, as it blends understanding human behavior with practical skills to support individuals, families, and communities.

Many students look for programs that are both reputable and budget-friendly. For those seeking the cheapest social work programs in Nevada, there are several flexible online degrees available. Similarly, students in Ohio can benefit from a range of affordable social work programs in Ohio designed to accommodate working professionals or those with family responsibilities.

In Pennsylvania, affordability and program quality are both key priorities. Exploring affordable social work programs in Pennsylvania can help students advance their education without undue financial stress. Moreover, if you are based on the West Coast, researching the cheapest social work degrees in Portland can lead to a cost-effective path into this rewarding profession.

With a psychology background, pursuing social work or affiliated online degrees offers flexible, in-demand career choices focused on helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Michaela Wänke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles