World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7091
World Ranking
8220
National Ranking
94

Sabine Sczesny publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Sczesny sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sabine Sczesny D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Sczesny sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sabine Sczesny is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland and conducts research primarily within the Social Sciences. Their work predominantly focuses on Gender Studies, with a significant number of publications addressing topics related to Gender Diversity and Inequality, Gender Roles and Identity Studies, and Social and Intergroup Psychology.

Their scientific contributions include research exploring the intersections of gender with social behavior and organizational phenomena. Key themes in their research involve issues such as Work-Family Balance Challenges, Media, Gender, and Advertising, as well as Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies, reflecting a broad engagement with gender-related social dynamics.

Sczesny has published extensively across various academic journals, with frequent contributions to Sex Roles, European Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, and Scientific Reports. This range of publication venues indicates an interdisciplinary approach within social and behavioral psychology.

Recent published papers include:

  • Migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees: Different labels for immigrants influence attitudes through perceived benefits in nine countries (2023, European Journal of Social Psychology)
  • Older and Younger Job Seekers' Impression Management on LinkedIn (2021, Journal of Personnel Psychology)
  • Perceived to be incompetent, but not a risk: Why men are evaluated as less suitable for childcare work than women (2021, Journal of Applied Social Psychology)
  • Footsteps I would like to follow? How gender quotas affect the acceptance of women leaders as role models and inspirations for leadership (2022, European Journal of Social Psychology)
  • Warmth and competence perceptions of key protagonists are associated with containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from 35 countries (2022, Scientific Reports)

They have collaborated frequently with several scholars, including Christa Nater, Sylvie Graf, Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Shera Malayeri, and Barbara Krahé, indicating active engagement in collaborative research efforts.

Sczesny's scholarly output is concentrated in the following publication venues:

  • Sex Roles
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Language and Social Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Scientific Reports

Their main fields of study are:

  • Social Sciences

The subfields of study encompass:

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Clinical Psychology

Key topics covered in their research include:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Gender Studies in Language
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Best Publications

  • Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.

    Alice H. Eagly;Christa Nater;David I. Miller;Michèle Kaufmann

  • Can Gender-Fair Language Reduce Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination?

    Sabine Sczesny;Magdalena Maria Formanowicz;Franziska Moser

  • Stereotypes About Women, Men, and Leaders. Have Times Changed?

    Alice H. Eagly;Sabine Sczesny

  • A closer look beneath the surface : Various facets of the think-manager-think-male stereotype

    Sabine Sczesny

  • Gender Stereotypes and the Attribution of Leadership Traits: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.

    Sabine Sczesny;Janine Bosak;Daniel Neff;Birgit Schyns

  • Representation of the sexes in language

    Dagmar Stahlberg;Friederike Braun;Lisa Irmen;Sabine Sczesny

  • Stereotypical Inferences as Mediators of Age Discrimination: The Role of Competence and Warmth

    Franciska Krings;Sabine Sczesny;Annette Kluge

  • The relationship between trust, attachment, and antisocial work behaviors

    Stefan Thau;Craig Crossley;Rebecca J. Bennett;Sabine Sczesny

  • Am I the right candidate? Self-ascribed fit of women and men to a leadership position.

    Janine Bosak;Sabine Sczesny

  • Gender Bias in Leader Selection? Evidence from a Hiring Simulation Study

    Janine Bosak;Sabine Sczesny

  • Name your favorite musician: Effects of masculine generics and of their alternatives in German

    Dagmar Stahlberg;Sabine Sczesny;Friederike Braun

  • Meta-Cognition about Biological Sex and Gender-Stereotypic Physical Appearance: Consequences for the Assessment of Leadership Competence

    Sabine Sczesny;Ulrich Kühnen

  • Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements

    Lisa Kristina Horvath;Sabine Sczesny

  • Cognitive effects of masculine generics in German: An overview of empirical findings

    Friederike Braun;Sabine Sczesny;Dagmar Stahlberg

  • Side effects of gender‐fair language: How feminine job titles influence the evaluation of female applicants

    Magdalena Maria Formanowicz;Sylwia Bedynska;Alexsandra Cislak;Friederike Braun

  • Exploring the Dynamics of Incongruent Beliefs about Women and Leaders

    Janine Bosak;Sabine Sczesny

  • Masculine = Competent? Physical Appearance and Sex as Sources of Gender-Stereotypic Attributions

    Sabine Sczesny;Sandra Spreemann;Dagmar Stahlberg

  • Norms on the gender perception of role nouns in Czech, English, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, and Slovak

    Julia Misersky;Pascal M. Gygax;Paolo Canal;Ute Gabriel

  • ON WONDERFUL WOMEN AND SEEING SMILES: SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION MODERATES THE HAPPY FACE RESPONSE LATENCY ADVANTAGE

    Kurt Hugenberg;Sabine Sczesny

  • Does Gender-Fair Language Pay Off? The Social Perception of Professions from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective

    Lisa K. Horvath;Elisa F. Merkel;Anne Maass;Sabine Sczesny

  • Beyond Sexist Beliefs How Do People Decide to Use Gender-Inclusive Language?

    Sabine Sczesny;Franziska Moser;Wendy Wood

  • Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership? Effects of the wording of job advertisements

    Lisa Kristina Horvath;Sabine Sczesny

Frequent Co-Authors

Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University
Wendy Wood
Wendy Wood University of Southern California
Thomas Vetter
Thomas Vetter University of Basel
Madeline E. Heilman
Madeline E. Heilman New York University
Laurie A. Rudman
Laurie A. Rudman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Amanda B. Diekman
Amanda B. Diekman Indiana University
Alan Garnham
Alan Garnham University of Sussex
Michaela Wänke
Michaela Wänke University of Mannheim
Jane Oakhill
Jane Oakhill University of Sussex
Anne Maass
Anne Maass University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, both clinical and non-clinical. One particularly sought-after pathway is speech-language pathology, which combines knowledge of communication disorders, psychology, and healthcare. To pursue this field, aspiring professionals must meet specific educational and licensing requirements that vary by state.

For example, those interested in practice can review the slp requirements in New Hampshire or the slp requirements in New Jersey for state-specific guidance on necessary degrees, supervised clinical hours, and examinations. Similarly, you can learn how to become a speech language pathologist in New Mexico or how to become a speech language pathologist in New York to compare pathways and prerequisites.

Many universities now offer accredited online degrees in psychology and related disciplines, which can provide a flexible route toward these professions. As you research your options, consider state requirements and accredited programs to ensure your online studies lead to licensure and meaningful career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Sabine Sczesny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles