World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5858
World Ranking
10132
National Ranking
485

Thomas Rigotti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Rigotti sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas Rigotti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Rigotti sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Rigotti is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology, health professions, and business, management, and accounting with a focus on applied psychological issues in workplace and health contexts.

Their work contributes extensively to subfields including clinical psychology, general health professions, organizational behavior and human resource management, social psychology, and aspects of sociology and political science.

Rigotti's research covers a range of topics centered around job satisfaction and organizational behavior, workplace health and well-being, resilience and mental health, and the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Other focal points include healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, and behavioral health interventions.

Frequent publication venues for Rigotti's research include:

  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rigotti are:

  • Antonia M. Werner
  • Jennifer L. Reichel
  • Pavel Dietz
  • Lina M. Mülder
  • Markus Schäfer

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Rigotti include:

  • The Corona Crisis: What Can We Learn from Earlier Studies in Applied Psychology? (2020, Applied Psychology)
  • Work-Related Psychosocial Risk Factors and Coping Resources during the COVID-19 Crisis (2021, Applied Psychology)
  • The impact of lockdown stress and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among university students in Germany (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • Dealing with information overload: a comprehensive review (2023, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Leaders as role models: Effects of leader presenteeism on employee presenteeism and sick leave (2020, Work & Stress)

Best Publications

  • A Short Version of the Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale: Structural and Construct Validity Across Five Countries

    Thomas Rigotti;Birgit Schyns;Gisela Mohr

  • Literature review of theory and research on the psychological impact of temporary employment: Towards a conceptual model

    Nele De Cuyper;Jeroen De Jong;Hans De Witte;Kerstin Isaksson

  • Irritation - ein Instrument zur Erfassung psychischer Beanspruchung im Arbeitskontext. Skalen- und Itemparameter aus 15 Studien

    Gisela Mohr;Thomas Rigotti;Andreas Müller

  • The Assessment of Psychological Strain in Work Contexts

    Gisela Mohr;Andreas Müller;Thomas Rigotti;Zeynep Aycan

  • Interruptions to workflow: Their relationship with irritation and satisfaction with performance, and the mediating roles of time pressure and mental demands

    Anja Baethge;Thomas Rigotti

  • Enough is enough? Threshold models for the relationship between psychological contract breach and job-related attitudes

    Thomas Rigotti

  • Dealing with information overload: a comprehensive review

    Unknown

  • Just more of the same, or different? An integrative theoretical framework for the study of cumulative interruptions at work

    Anja Baethge;Thomas Rigotti;Robert A. Roe

  • Balancing psychological contracts: Validation of a typology

    Nele De Cuyper;Thomas Rigotti;Hans De Witte;Gisela Mohr

  • The impact of lockdown stress and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health among university students in Germany.

    Antonia M Werner;Ana N Tibubos;Lina M Mülder;Jennifer L Reichel

  • Think transformational leadership – Think female?

    Christiane R Stempel;Thomas Rigotti;Gisela Mohr

  • Normwerte der Skala Irritation: Zwei Dimensionen psychischer Beanspruchung1

    Gisela Mohr;Andreas Müller;Thomas Rigotti

  • What about the leader? Crossover of emotional exhaustion and work engagement from followers to leaders.

    Nina Wirtz;Thomas Rigotti;Kathleen Otto;Carina Loeb

  • Leaders as role models: Effects of leader presenteeism on employee presenteeism and sick leave

    Carolin Dietz;Hannes Zacher;Tabea Scheel;Kathleen Otto

  • Playing-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Music Students-Associated Musculoskeletal Signs

    A Steinmetz;H Möller;W Seidel;T Rigotti

  • The relation between transformational leadership and follower emotional strain: The moderating role of professional ambition:

    Torsten J Holstad;Sabine Korek;Thomas Rigotti;Gisela Mohr

  • Construct Validity and Population-Based Norms of the German Brief Resilience Scale (BRS).

    Angela M Kunzler;Andrea Chmitorz;Christiana Bagusat;Antonia J Kaluza

  • Differenzielle Aspekte psychischer Beanspruchung aus Sicht der Zielorientierung

    Andreas Müller;Gisela Mohr;Thomas Rigotti

  • Work-Related Psychosocial Risk Factors and Coping Resources during the COVID-19 Crisis

    Thomas Rigotti;Thomas Rigotti;Liu-Qin Yang;Zhou Jiang;Alexander Newman

  • Nursing performance under high workload: a diary study on the moderating role of selection, optimization and compensation strategies

    Anja Baethge;Andreas Müller;Thomas Rigotti

  • The Corona Crisis: What Can We Learn from Earlier Studies in Applied Psychology?

    Thomas Rigotti;Thomas Rigotti;Nele De Cuyper;Tomoki Sekiguchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Manfred E. Beutel
Manfred E. Beutel Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
René Schalk
René Schalk Tilburg University
Raffael Kalisch
Raffael Kalisch Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Birgit Schyns
Birgit Schyns NEOMA Business School
José M. Peiró
José M. Peiró University of Valencia
David Guest
David Guest King's College London
Daniel F. Gucciardi
Daniel F. Gucciardi Curtin University
Rolf van Dick
Rolf van Dick Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways, particularly in social work and mental health fields. Many students interested in counseling or becoming licensed professionals pursue degrees that align with state requirements.

Each state has its own regulations for becoming a social worker. For example, it’s important to know degree needed to be a social worker in Maine, as well as the Maryland minimum degree requirement for social workers. These often include earning a bachelor’s or master’s degree in social work or a related field.

Other states, like Massachusetts, have unique standards, so students should review the Massachusetts education requirements for social workers and the Michigan education requirements for social workers if planning to practice there. Online psychology-related degrees can help students meet these qualifications while allowing for flexible, remote study.

Ultimately, understanding state-specific requirements helps you make informed decisions about your education and career options in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Rigotti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles