World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
96
Citations
39948
World Ranking
730
National Ranking
39

Toon W. Taris publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toon W. Taris sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 327 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Toon W. Taris D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Toon W. Taris sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Toon W. Taris is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans fields such as Health Professions, Psychology, and Business, Management and Accounting. The focus within these fields includes General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics covered in Toon W. Taris's work involve areas such as Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, Employment and Welfare Studies, Workplace Health and Well-being, Workaholism, burnout, and well-being, Health disparities and outcomes, as well as Behavioral Health and Interventions.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Work & Stress
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Strategies addressing the limitations of cross-sectional designs in occupational health psychology: What they are good for (and what not), 2021, Work & Stress
  • Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis, 2020, The Leadership Quarterly
  • An exploration of the component validity of job crafting, 2020, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • Organizational context matters: Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to team and individual motivational functioning, 2021, Safety Science
  • Leadership and Workplace Aggression: A Meta-analysis, 2022, Journal of Business Ethics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Toon W. Taris include:

  • Maria C. W. Peeters
  • Peikai Li
  • Jan de Jonge
  • Evelien H. van Leeuwen
  • Janske H. W. van Eersel

Best Publications

  • Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology

    Arnold B. Bakker;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Michael P. Leiter;Toon W. Taris

  • A Critical Review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for Improving Work and Health

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Toon W. Taris

  • Workaholism, Burnout, and Work Engagement: Three of a Kind or Three Different Kinds of Employee Well‐being?

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Toon W. Taris;Willem Van Rhenen

  • The Very Best of the Millennium: Longitudinal Research and the Demand-Control-(Support) Model

    A.H.de Lange;T.W. Taris;M.A.J. Kompier;I.L.D. Houtman

  • A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations

    Arnold B. Bakker;Evangelia Demerouti;Toon W. Taris;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • The conceptualization and measurement of burnout: Common ground and worlds apart

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Toon W. Taris

  • The structure of occupational well-being: A study among Dutch teachers

    Joan E. Van Horn;Toon W. Taris;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Paul J.G. Schreurs

  • Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING

    Sabine A. E. Geurts;Toon W. Taris;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Josje S. E. Dikkers

  • When do job demands particularly predict burnout?: The moderating role of job resources

    Despoina Xanthopoulou;Arnold B. Bakker;Maureen F. Dollard;Evangelia Demerouti

  • Is there a relationship between burnout and objective performance? A critical review of 16 studies

    Toon W. Taris

  • Are there causal relationships between the dimensions of the Maslach Burnout Inventory? A review and two longitudinal tests

    Toon W. Taris;Pascale M. Le Blanc;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Paul J. G. Schreurs

  • Being Driven to Work Excessively Hard: The Evaluation of a Two-Factor Measure of Workaholism in The Netherlands and Japan

    Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Akihito Shimazu;Toon W. Taris

  • The relationships between work characteristics and mental health: examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study

    Annet H. De Lange;Toon W. Taris;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Irene L. D. Houtman

  • For Fun, Love, or Money: What Drives Workaholic, Engaged, and Burned‐Out Employees at Work?

    Ilona van Beek;Qiao Hu;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Toon W. Taris

  • Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time

    Evangelia Demerouti;Arnold B. Bakker;Sabine A.E. Geurts;Toon W. Taris

  • The Job Demands-Resources Model: An Analysis of Additive and Joint Effects of Demands and Resources.

    Qiao Hu;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Toon W. Taris

  • A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis

    Toon W. Taris

  • Well-being and organizational performance: an organizational-level test of the happy-productive worker hypothesis.

    Toon W. Taris;Paul J.G. Schreurs

  • Take Care! The Evaluation of a Team-Based Burnout Intervention Program for Oncology Care Providers

    Pascale M. Le Blanc;Joop J. Hox;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Toon W. Taris

  • Workaholism in the Netherlands: Measurement and Implications for Job Strain and Work–Nonwork Conflict

    Toon W. Taris;Wilmar B. Schaufeli;Lotus C. Verhoeven

Frequent Co-Authors

Michiel A. J. Kompier
Michiel A. J. Kompier Radboud University
Maria C. W. Peeters
Maria C. W. Peeters Utrecht University
Sabine A. E. Geurts
Sabine A. E. Geurts Radboud University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marise Ph. Born
Marise Ph. Born Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Fekke Ybema
Jan Fekke Ybema Utrecht University
Roland W. B. Blonk
Roland W. B. Blonk Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Edwin A. J. van Hooft
Edwin A. J. van Hooft University of Amsterdam
Gün R. Semin
Gün R. Semin ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology opens up a wide range of career opportunities, especially in fields like behavior analysis, counseling, and mental health services. Many psychology graduates pursue specialized certifications, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which is highly regarded in schools, clinics, and research settings.

Requirements for BCBA certification can differ by location. For instance, you can learn more about bcba certification requirements in Houston, which detail the education and supervised experience needed in Texas. If you’re in Alabama, explore the specific bcba certification requirements in Huntsville.

Requirements may also vary in other major cities. For example, take a closer look at the Indianapolis bcba requirements and compare them to the bcba certification requirements in Irvine for California-based candidates.

Stay informed about the regional differences in certification and start your online degree or licensure pathway with confidence. The right combination of coursework and practical experience will help launch your psychology career in any state.

Best Scientists Citing Toon W. Taris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles