World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Edwin A. J. van Hooft

Edwin A. J. van Hooft

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4759
World Ranking
10533
National Ranking
463

Edwin A. J. van Hooft publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin A. J. van Hooft sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Edwin A. J. van Hooft D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin A. J. van Hooft sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edwin A. J. van Hooft is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with particular attention to topics related to employment, organizational behavior, and workplace well-being.

Their recent publications include a range of articles addressing job search processes and career development. Notable papers are:

  • Job search and employment success: A quantitative review and future research agenda., 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • How to successfully manage the school-to-work transition: Integrating job search quality in the social cognitive model of career self-management, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • A temporal perspective of job search: The relation between personality attributes, motivation, job search behavior, and outcomes, 2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • How to minimize job insecurity: The role of proactive and reactive coping over time, 2022, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • In the Eye of the Beholder: Leader Error Orientation, Employee Perception of Leader, and Employee Work-Related Outcomes, 2021, Academy of Management Discoveries

They frequently publish in various scholarly venues, including:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Gedrag & Organisatie
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Applied Psychology

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with several researchers, such as:

  • A.E.M. van Vianen
  • Matthijs de Hoog
  • Greet Van Hoye
  • Judith B. Langerak
  • Daan A. H. Fris

Van Hooft's research spans numerous subfields within psychology, including General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Demography, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their scholarly focus is reflected in the topics they cover, which include:

  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Medical Education and Admissions

Best Publications

  • The job-search grind: perceived progress, self-reactions, and self-regulation of search effort

    Connie R. Wanberg;Jing Zhu;Edwin A. J. van Hooft

  • Networking as a job search behaviour: A social network perspective

    Greet Van Hoye;Edwin A. J. van Hooft;Filip Lievens

  • PREDICTORS OF JOB SEARCH BEHAVIOR AMONG EMPLOYED AND UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE

    Edwin A. J. Van Hooft;Marise Ph. Born;Toon W. Taris;Henk Van Der Flier

  • Not doing bad things is not equivalent to doing the right thing: distinguishing between inhibitory and initiatory self-control

    Denise T.D. de Ridder;Benjamin J. de Boer;Peter Lugtig;Arnold B. Bakker

  • Boredom at work: Proximal and distal consequences of affective work-related boredom.

    Madelon L. M. van Hooff;Edwin A. J. van Hooft

  • The Effects of Goal Orientation on Job Search and Reemployment: A Field Experiment Among Unemployed Job Seekers

    Edwin A. J. van Hooft;Gera Noordzij

  • Bridging the gap between intentions and behavior: Implementation intentions, action control, and procrastination

    Edwin A.J. van Hooft;Marise Ph. Born;Toon W. Taris;Henk van der Flier

  • Job search and the theory of planned behavior: Minority–majority group differences in The Netherlands

    Edwin A.J. van Hooft;Marise Ph. Born;Toon W. Taris;Henk van der Flier

  • Moving beyond job search quantity: Towards a conceptualization and self-regulatory framework of job search quality

    Edwin A. J. Van Hooft;Connie R. Wanberg;Greet van Hoye

  • Job search and employment success: A quantitative review and future research agenda.

    Edwin A. J. van Hooft;John D. Kammeyer-Mueller;Connie R. Wanberg;Ruth Kanfer

  • Predicting job seeking for temporary employment using the theory of planned behaviour: The moderating role of individualism and collectivism

    Edwin A. J. Van Hooft;Mireille De Jong

  • Predictors and outcomes of job search behavior: The moderating effects of gender and family situation

    Edwin A.J. Van Hooft;Marise Ph. Born;Toon W. Taris;Henk van der Flier

  • Ethnic and gender differences in applicants' decision-making processes: An application of the theory of reasoned action

    Edwin A. J. Van Hooft;Marise Ph. Born;Toon W. Taris;Henk Van der Flier

  • Intentional response distortion on personality tests: using eye-tracking to understand response processes when faking.

    Edwin A. J. van Hooft;Marise Ph. Born

  • The Effects of a Learning-Goal Orientation Training on Self-Regulation: A Field Experiment Among Unemployed Job Seekers

    Gera Noordzij;Edwin A. J. van Hooft;Heleen van Mierlo;Arjan van Dam

  • Navigating the Black Hole: Explicating Layers of Job Search Context and Adaptational Responses

    Connie R Wanberg;Gokce Basbug;Edwin A J Van Hooft;Archana Samtani

  • The state of boredom: Frustrating or depressing?

    Edwin A. J. van Hooft;Madelon L. M. van Hooff

  • Recruiting highly educated graduates: a study on the relationship between recruitment information sources, the theory of planned behavior, and actual job pursuit

    Yasmina Jaidi;Edwin A. J. Van Hooft;Lidia R. Arends

  • Stop and start control: A distinction within self‐control

    Benjamin J. de Boer;Edwin A. J. van Hooft;Arnold B. Bakker

  • Construct validity of multi-source performance ratings: an examination of the relationship of self-, supervisor-, and peer-ratings with cognitive and personality measures

    Edwin A. J. van Hooft;Henk van der Flier;Marjolein R. Minne

  • Predicting applicants’ job pursuit behavior from their selection expectations: the mediating role of the theory of planned behavior

    Bert Hj Schreurs;Eva Derous;Edwin A.J. Van Hooft;Karin Proost

Frequent Co-Authors

Marise Ph. Born
Marise Ph. Born Erasmus University Rotterdam
Connie R. Wanberg
Connie R. Wanberg University of Minnesota
Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
Annelies E.M. van Vianen
Annelies E.M. van Vianen University of Amsterdam
Peter P. Groenewegen
Peter P. Groenewegen Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ute-Christine Klehe
Ute-Christine Klehe University of Giessen
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Astrid C. Homan
Astrid C. Homan University of Amsterdam
Roland W. B. Blonk
Roland W. B. Blonk Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an advanced degree in psychology unlocks a range of online study options and diverse career paths. Those interested in the workplace or organizational dynamics often pursue industrial-organizational psychology. If you’re exploring this specialty, you may wonder what degree is needed for industrial organizational psychology. Generally, a master’s or PhD is required to access top positions in this field.

Another key decision for psychology students involves choosing between a clinical or medical pathway. Learn more about the professional requirements and daily roles when weighing psychologist vs psychiatrist careers. This comparison helps clarify which academic track and credentials best fit your goals.

The industrial organizational psychology job outlook remains promising, with strong growth predicted as businesses increasingly value expertise in workforce productivity and wellbeing. Beyond traditional roles, explore the variety of industrial and organizational psychology careers open to graduates—from consulting to HR analytics, and leadership development.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin A. J. van Hooft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles