World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
52
Citations
18923
World Ranking
2370
National Ranking
1150

Thomas G. Bever publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Bever sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 158 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Thomas G. Bever D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas G. Bever sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1976 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Thomas G. Bever is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, focusing primarily on Medicine and Engineering. Within these broad domains, key subfields include Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Medical Imaging and Analysis
  • Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Recent papers by Thomas G. Bever include:

  • How Cognition Came into Being, 2021, published in Cognition
  • Even Deeper Problems with Neural Network Models of Language, 2023, published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Although several recent publications in the dataset are related to other authors, they reflect the general research environment with which Bever is associated.

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Matthew J. Budoff
  • F. Flores
  • H. Hosseini
  • Hamid Bakhsheshi
  • Songshou Mao

Thomas G. Bever's publications have been featured primarily in the following venues:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
  • Cognition
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ECS Meeting Abstracts

In 1976, the scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

Best Publications

  • The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar

    David B. Pisoni;J. A. Fodor;T. G. Bever;M. F. Garrett

  • The cognitive basis for linguistic structures

    T. G. Bever

  • Cerebral Dominance in Musicians and Nonmusicians

    Thomas G. Bever;Robert J. Chiarello

  • The Psychology of Language

    Robert St. Clair;J. A. Fodor;T. G. Bever;M. F. Garret

  • Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules

    David J. Townsend;Thomas G. Bever

  • Can an ape create a sentence

    H. S. Terrace;L. A. Petitto;R. J. Sanders;T. G. Bever

  • The psychological reality of linguistic segments

    J.A. Fodor;T.G. Bever

  • Children use canonical sentence schemas: a crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections.

    Dan I. Slobin;Thomas G. Bever

  • The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children

    Toben H. Mintz;Elissa L. Newport;Thomas G. Bever

  • Cognitive Capacity of Very Young Children

    Jacques Mehler;Thomas G. Bever

  • The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme.

    H.B. Savin;T.G. Bever

  • The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning models: constructive critique of some connectionist learning models

    Joel Lachter;Thomas G. Bever

  • The active use of grammar in speech perception

    Merrill Garrett;Thomas Bever;Jerry Fodor

  • Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension

    Thomas G. Bever;Brian McElree

  • The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of immediate speech processing

    T. G. Bever;J. R. Lackner;R. Kirk

  • Cerebral asymmetries in humans are due to the differentiation of two incompatible processes: holistic and analytic.

    Thomas G. Bever

  • Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules

    Unknown

  • Serial learning in the pigeon.

    R. O. Straub;M. S. Seidenberg;Thomas G. Bever;H. S. Terrace

  • The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps

    Brian McElree;Thomas G. Bever

  • Analysis by Synthesis: A (Re-)Emerging Program of Research for Language and Vision

    Thomas G. Bever;David Poeppel

  • In search of ambiguity

    Donald G. Mackay;Thomas G. Bever

  • Sources of Variance in an Information Processing Theory of Timing

    H. L. Roitblat;H. S. Terrace;T. G. Bever

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert S. Terrace
Herbert S. Terrace Columbia University
Jerry A. Fodor
Jerry A. Fodor Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jacques Mehler
Jacques Mehler International School for Advanced Studies
Merrill F. Garrett
Merrill F. Garrett University of Arizona
John M. Carroll
John M. Carroll University of Sussex
James R. Lackner
James R. Lackner Brandeis University
Luciano Fadiga
Luciano Fadiga Italian Institute of Technology
Elissa L. Newport
Elissa L. Newport Georgetown University
Brian McElree
Brian McElree New York University
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities, there are a variety of flexible education options available online. Many students are turning to online master programs to accelerate their academic growth and develop deeper expertise in fields like psychology, public administration, and education.

For those at the start of their higher education journey, online bachelor degree programs allow for a faster track to graduation. These programs offer convenience and adaptability—perfect for working adults or those with family responsibilities.

Social work remains an in-demand field, but balancing affordability and quality is key. If you're interested in becoming a licensed social worker, explore the cheapest online msw programs to find accredited and budget-friendly options.

Similarly, those looking to specialize in behavioral analysis should consider bcba certification online. These programs provide a structured path toward certification while minimizing financial barriers, supporting both career changers and advancing professionals.

Each pathway opens doors to wide-ranging roles in research, counseling, education, and policy development—empowering you to make a real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas G. Bever

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles