World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
94
Citations
36174
World Ranking
808
National Ranking
38

Anne Cutler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Cutler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 469 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Anne Cutler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Cutler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 2000 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1999 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Anne Cutler was affiliated with Western Sydney University in Australia and contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their research focused heavily on phonetics and phonology, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, language development and disorders, multisensory perception and integration, linguistic variation, categorization and perception, as well as hearing loss and rehabilitation.

Their work spanned multiple subfields, including experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, linguistics and language, and artificial intelligence.

Anne Cutler's frequent collaborators included the following researchers:

  • Mark Antoniou
  • Laurence Bruggeman
  • Martin Ho Kwan Ip
  • Shruti Ullas
  • Elia Formisano

Many of their publications appeared in the journal Cognition, with a total of five papers there, along with other contributions to Language and Speech, Bilingualism Language and Cognition, Autism Research, and Scientific Reports.

Among the recent papers published by Anne Cutler were:

  • "Universals of listening: Equivalent prosodic entrainment in tone and non-tone languages," 2020, Cognition
  • "More why, less how: What we need from models of cognition," 2021, Cognition
  • "Audiovisual and lexical cues do not additively enhance perceptual adaptation," 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "RETRACTED: Auditory perceptual learning in autistic adults," 2022, Autism Research
  • "Neural Correlates of Phonetic Adaptation as Induced by Lexical and Audiovisual Context," 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Anne Cutler was recognized with several notable distinctions. They were elected a Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, in 2015. Earlier recognitions included membership in the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2000 and the Academia Europaea in 1999.

Best Publications

  • The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access

    Anne Cutler;Dennis Norris

  • Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review.

    Anne Cutler;Delphine Dahan;Wilma Van Donselaar

  • Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words.

    Peter W. Jusczyk;Anne Cutler;Nancy J. Redanz

  • The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary

    Anne Cutler;David M. Carter

  • Perceptual learning in speech.

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • The access and processing of idiomatic expressions

    David A. Swinney;Anne Cutler

  • The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English

    Anne Cutler;Jacques Mehler;Dennis Norris;Juan Segui

  • Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception

    Anne Cutler;Sally Butterfield

  • Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition

    Andrea Weber;Anne Cutler

  • Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words

    Anne Cutler;Anne Cutler

  • Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese

    Takashi Otake;Giyooo Hatano;Anne Cutler;Jacques Mehler

  • Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon

    David Fay;Anne Cutler

  • The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals.

    Anne Cutler;Jacques Mehler;Dennis Norris;Juan Segui

  • The Possible-Word Constraint in the Segmentation of Continuous Speech

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler;Sally Butterfield

  • Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition

    Dennis Norris;James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler

  • Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon

    James M. McQueen;Anne Cutler;Dennis Norris

  • Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners

    Anne Cutler;Andrea Weber;Roel Smits;Nicole Cooper

  • Mora or Phoneme? Further Evidence for Language-Specific Listening

    Anne Cutler;Takashi Otake

  • Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour

    Anne Cutler

  • Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words

    James M. McQueen;Dennis Norris;Anne Cutler

  • The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English

    Anne Cutler;Jacques Mehler;Dennis Norris;J Sequi

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis Norris
Dennis Norris University of Cambridge
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Jacques Mehler
Jacques Mehler International School for Advanced Studies
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Núria Sebastián-Gallés Pompeu Fabra University
Peter W. Jusczyk
Peter W. Jusczyk Johns Hopkins University
Mark Onslow
Mark Onslow University of Technology Sydney
Denis K Burnham
Denis K Burnham Western Sydney University
Catherine T. Best
Catherine T. Best Haskins Laboratories

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Psychology opens up a range of career opportunities, from counseling and therapy to research and education. Many students explore online programs as a flexible way to start or advance their education. However, if you aim to become a licensed therapist, it’s important to understand that state-specific requirements will strongly impact your path.

For example, if you want to practice in Texas, you must meet the Dallas licensed therapist education requirements, while the process for becoming a licensed therapist differs in other locations. Those interested in Colorado should review the steps on how to become a licensed therapist in Denver. Similarly, prospective therapists considering Michigan or North Carolina should be aware of the requirements detailed in how to become a licensed therapist in Detroit and licensed therapist requirements in Durham.

Understanding these differences can help you choose the right online program and ensure you are on track for licensure in your desired state. Be sure to research your chosen destination thoroughly and review state boards for the most up-to-date information.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Cutler

Recently Published Articles