World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
29144
World Ranking
2229
National Ranking
1299

Peter W. Jusczyk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. Jusczyk sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter W. Jusczyk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter W. Jusczyk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter W. Jusczyk was affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their academic career included work in the field of research associated with this institution.

Throughout their career, Jusczyk's contributions to scientific literature did not result in listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues, nor documented book publications or awards. There are also no recorded data on the main fields or subfields of study, or specific topics of work attributable to Jusczyk based on the available information.

The absence of detailed published research records and collaborations in the data may indicate either a specialized or less documented academic path. It is also noted that Jusczyk is deceased, and analyses of their career are therefore conducted with respect to completed contributions.

Best Publications

  • Speech perception in infants.

    Peter D. Eimas;Einar R. Siqueland;Peter Jusczyk;James Vigorito

  • A precursor of language acquisition in young infants.

    Jacques Mehler;Peter Jusczyk;Ghislaine Lambertz;Nilofar Halsted

  • Infants′ Detection of the Sound Patterns of Words in Fluent Speech

    Peter W. Jusczyk;Richard N. Aslin

  • The discovery of spoken language

    Peter W. Jusczyk

  • Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words.

    Peter W. Jusczyk;Anne Cutler;Nancy J. Redanz

  • The Beginnings of Word Segmentation in English-Learning Infants.

    Peter W. Jusczyk;Derek M. Houston;Mary Newsome

  • Infants′ Sensitivity to Phonotactic Patterns in the Native Language

    Peter W. Jusczyk;Paul A. Luce;Jan Charles-Luce

  • Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words

    Peter W. Jusczyk;Angela D. Friederici;Jeanine M. Wessels;Vigdis Y. Svenkerud

  • Clauses are perceptual units for young infants

    Kathy Hirsh-Pasek;Deborah G. Kemler Nelson;Peter W. Jusczyk;Kimberly Wright Cassidy

  • Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics

    Elizabeth K. Johnson;Peter W. Jusczyk

  • Some Beginnings of Word Comprehension in 6-Month-Olds

    Ruth Tincoff;Peter W. Jusczyk

  • Phonotactic and Prosodic Effects on Word Segmentation in Infants

    Sven L. Mattys;Peter W. Jusczyk;Paul A. Luce;James L. Morgan

  • Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants.

    Peter W Jusczyk;Peter W Jusczyk;Kathy Hirsh-Pasek;Deborah G Kemler Nelson;Lori J Kennedy

  • How the prosodic cues in motherese might assist language learning.

    Deborah G. Kemler Nelson;Kathy Hirsh-Pasek;Peter W. Jusczyk;Kimberly Wright Cassidy

  • Language Discrimination by English-Learning 5-Month-Olds: Effects of Rhythm and Familiarity

    Thierry Nazzi;Peter W Jusczyk;Elizabeth K Johnson

  • The head-turn preference procedure for testing auditory perception

    Deborah G. Kemler Nelson;Peter W. Jusczyk;Denise R. Mandel;James Myers

  • Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants.

    Sven L Mattys;Peter W Jusczyk

  • Infants' Recognition of the Sound Patterns of Their Own Names

    Denise R. Mandel;Peter W. Jusczyk;David B. Pisoni

  • Developmental Neurocognition: Speech and Face Processing in the First Year of Life

    B. De Boysson-Bardies;Scania de Schonen;Peter Jusczyk;Peter MacNeilage

  • Infants' early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: a retrospective analysis.

    Rochelle Newman;Nan Bernstein Ratner;Ann Marie Jusczyk;Peter W. Jusczyk

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth K. Johnson
Elizabeth K. Johnson University of Toronto
Rochelle S. Newman
Rochelle S. Newman University of Maryland, College Park
Paul A. Luce
Paul A. Luce University at Buffalo, State University of New York
David B. Pisoni
David B. Pisoni Indiana University
Jacques Mehler
Jacques Mehler International School for Advanced Studies
Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler Western Sydney University
Thierry Nazzi
Thierry Nazzi Université Paris Cité
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek Temple University
LouAnn Gerken
LouAnn Gerken University of Arizona
Linda B. Smith
Linda B. Smith Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens up a wide range of specialized career paths. Graduates with advanced degrees often find rewarding roles in both clinical and non-clinical settings. For instance, a popular option is a master’s in behavioral psychology, which can lead to various behavioral psychology masters jobs such as behavioral therapists or counselors working with schools, clinics, or community organizations.

Some psychology professionals serve unique populations, such as the military. While many think of military psychology as an active duty role, there are a variety of civilian psychologist jobs military experts can pursue, providing essential support to veterans and service members without enlisting.

If you have an interest in brain science, explore careers in neuropsychology. Neuropsychologists study how the brain affects behavior and often work in hospitals, research institutions, and rehabilitation centers.

Those interested in the business world may gravitate toward industrial-organizational psychology. These experts help companies improve productivity and workplace satisfaction. Information about the potential organizational psychologist salary and job outlook can guide your decision as you plan your career in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Peter W. Jusczyk

Recently Published Articles