World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6129 5697 46 44 148 9978

Thierry Nazzi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thierry Nazzi between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thierry Nazzi published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2016. 15 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2016. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1995 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thierry Nazzi: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 4
1999 0
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 0
2005 5
2006 7
2007 3
2008 7
2009 6
2010 9
2011 10
2012 8
2013 7
2014 10
2015 11
2016 14
2017 4
2018 10
2019 6
2020 6
2021 3
2022 7
2023 8
2024 6
2025 9
Total 171
Download as CSV

Thierry Nazzi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thierry Nazzi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thierry Nazzi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thierry Nazzi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thierry Nazzi is affiliated with Université Paris Cité in France. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant body of work in developmental and educational psychology, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology. Their interests extend to cognitive neuroscience, pharmacy, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, reflecting a broad engagement with psychological and developmental sciences.

Nazzi's research covers several main topics including language development and disorders, reading and literacy development, phonetics and phonology research, child and animal learning development, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, infant health and development, and infant development and preterm care.

Their frequent publication venues include Developmental Science, Journal of Child Language, Frontiers in Psychology, Cognition, and Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. This diverse range of journals indicates a strong presence in both psychological sciences and language-related research fields.

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of Nazzi's work, with frequent coauthors including Natalie Boll-Avetisyan, Barbara Höhle, Sandrien van Ommen, Lionel Granjon, and Regine Lai, reflecting ongoing partnerships within the developmental psychology and language acquisition research community.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Nazzi are:

  • "Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference," 2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "Newborns modulate their crawling in response to their native language but not another language," 2022, Developmental Science
  • "Variation in phonological bias: Bias for vowels, rather than consonants or tones in lexical processing by Cantonese-learning toddlers," 2020, Cognition
  • "Emergence of a consonant bias during the first year of life: New evidence from own-name recognition," 2020, Infancy
  • "The development of tone discrimination in infancy: Evidence from a cross-linguistic, multi-lab report," 2023, Developmental Science

Best Publications

  • Language Discrimination by Newborns: Toward an Understanding of the Role of Rhythm

    Thierry Nazzi;Josiane Bertoncini;Jacques Mehler

  • Language Discrimination by English-Learning 5-Month-Olds: Effects of Rhythm and Familiarity

    Thierry Nazzi;Peter W Jusczyk;Elizabeth K Johnson

  • Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm.

    Unknown

  • A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research : Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building

    Michael C. Frank;Elika Bergelson;Christina Bergmann;Alejandrina Cristia

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Perception and acquisition of linguistic rhythm by infants

    Thierry Nazzi;Franck Ramus

  • Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels

    Thierry Nazzi

  • Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: Evidence from German and French infants

    Barbara Höhle;Ranka Bijeljac-Babic;Ranka Bijeljac-Babic;Birgit Herold;Jürgen Weissenborn

  • Coping With Linguistic Diversity: The Infant's Viewpoint

    Jacques Mehler;Emmanuel Dupoux;Thierry Nazzi;Ghislaine

  • Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences

    Thierry Nazzi;Galina Iakimova;Josiane Bertoncini;Séverine Frédonie

  • Before and after the vocabulary spurt: two modes of word acquisition?

    Thierry Nazzi;Josiane Bertoncini

  • DISCRIMINATION OF PITCH CONTOURS BY NEONATES

    Thierry Nazzi;Caroline Floccia;Josiane Bertoncini

  • Six-Month-Olds' Detection of Clauses Embedded in Continuous Speech: Effects of Prosodic Well-Formedness.

    Thierry Nazzi;Deborah G Kemler Nelson;Peter W Jusczyk;Ann Marie Jusczyk

  • Linguistic and cognitive abilities in infancy: when does language become a tool for categorization?

    Thierry Nazzi;Alison Gopnik

  • Differential Processing of Consonants and Vowels in Lexical Access Through Reading

    Boris New;Verónica Araújo;Verónica Araújo;Thierry Nazzi

  • Infant ability to tell voices apart rests on language experience.

    Elizabeth K. Johnson;Ellen Westrek;Thierry Nazzi;Anne Cutler

  • English-learning infants' segmentation of verbs from fluent speech.

    Thierry Nazzi;Laura C. Dilley;Ann Marie Jusczyk;Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel

  • Early Word Segmentation by Infants and Toddlers With Williams Syndrome

    Thierry Nazzi;Sarah Paterson;Annette Karmiloff-Smith

  • Prosodic grouping at birth

    Nawal Abboub;Thierry Nazzi;Judit Gervain

  • Better Processing of Consonantal Over Vocalic Information in Word Learning at 16 Months of Age

    Mélanie Havy;Thierry Nazzi

  • Bias for consonantal information over vocalic information in 30-month-olds: cross-linguistic evidence from French and English.

    Thierry Nazzi;Caroline Floccia;Bérangère Moquet;Joseph Butler

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Polka
Linda Polka McGill University
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith Birkbeck, University of London
Alison Gopnik
Alison Gopnik University of California, Berkeley
Elizabeth K. Johnson
Elizabeth K. Johnson University of Toronto
Peter W. Jusczyk
Peter W. Jusczyk Johns Hopkins University
Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler Western Sydney University
Jacques Mehler
Jacques Mehler International School for Advanced Studies
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University
J. Kiley Hamlin
J. Kiley Hamlin University of British Columbia
Sandra R. Waxman
Sandra R. Waxman Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field of study in the USA reveals a range of highly sought-after specializations. If you’re considering your academic path, check out the most popular psychology degree programs in America to get a sense of where students are focusing their efforts and what schools offer leading curricula.

Many universities now offer online psychology degrees, making it easier to balance study with other commitments. For those located in the Northeast, some of the most valuable online psychology programs in Philadelphia are designed to maximize career opportunities and prepare students for both traditional and emerging roles in the field.

Cost and return on investment are top concerns for many students. States like Arizona feature the best value psychology programs in Arizona, combining quality education with affordability. Likewise, students in the Pacific region can benefit from the most valuable psychology degrees in Hawaii when considering local and online study options.

No matter where you study, choosing the right program can shape your psychology career and open doors in counseling, research, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Thierry Nazzi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles