World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
10002
World Ranking
10018
National Ranking
697

J. Kiley Hamlin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Kiley Hamlin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

J. Kiley Hamlin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Kiley Hamlin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Kiley Hamlin is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and works primarily within the field of psychology, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology. Their research has addressed various topics related to child development, social and moral cognition, and neuroendocrine regulation.

Among their main areas of study are:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Infant Health and Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development

Hamlin has contributed to numerous papers, some of which have been influential in developmental and psychological science. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Quantifying Sources of Variability in Infancy Research Using the Infant-Directed-Speech Preference" (2020), published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "Building a collaborative psychological science: Lessons learned from ManyBabies 1." (2020), published in Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
  • "Build up big-team science" (2022), published in Nature
  • "A Multilab Study of Bilingual Infants: Exploring the Preference for Infant-Directed Speech" (2021), published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • "Human Morality Is Based on an Early-Emerging Moral Core" (2022), published in Annual Review of Developmental Psychology

The venues where Hamlin frequently publishes highlight a multidisciplinary approach linking psychology with developmental science. These publication venues include:

  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
  • Developmental Science
  • Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne

Collaborations are an important aspect of Hamlin's work. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Frank, Krista Byers-Heinlein, Mélanie Söderström, Casey Lew-Williams, and Christina Bergmann, reflecting a focus on social and cognitive developmental research networks.

Best Publications

  • Social Evaluation by Preverbal Infants

    J Kiley Hamlin;Karen Wynn;Paul Bloom

  • Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others.

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Karen Wynn

  • Three-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations.

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Karen Wynn;Paul Bloom

  • How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Karen Wynn;Paul J. Bloom;Neha Mahajan

  • Moral Judgment and Action in Preverbal Infants and Toddlers Evidence for an Innate Moral Core

    J. Kiley Hamlin

  • Giving Leads to Happiness in Young Children

    Lara B. Aknin;J. Kiley Hamlin;Elizabeth W. Dunn

  • Not Like Me = Bad Infants Prefer Those Who Harm Dissimilar Others

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Neha Mahajan;Zoe Liberman;Karen Wynn

  • A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research : Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building

    Michael C. Frank;Elika Bergelson;Christina Bergmann;Alejandrina Cristia

  • Positive feelings reward and promote prosocial behavior.

    Lara B Aknin;Julia W Van de Vondervoort;J Kiley Hamlin

  • Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed-speech preference

    Michael C. Frank;Katherine Jane Alcock;Natalia Arias-Trejo;Gisa Aschersleben

  • Failed attempts to help and harm: intention versus outcome in preverbal infants' social evaluations.

    J. Kiley Hamlin

  • Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society.

    Lara B. Aknin;Tanya Broesch;J. Kiley Hamlin;Julia W. Van de Vondervoort

  • The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model.

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Tomer Ullman;Josh Tenenbaum;Noah Goodman

  • Do as I do: 7-month-old infants selectively reproduce others' goals.

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Elizabeth V. Hallinan;Amanda L. Woodward

  • Who knows what's good to eat? Infants fail to match the food preferences of antisocial others

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Karen Wynn

  • Social Evaluation of Intentional, Truly Accidental, and Negligently Accidental Helpers and Harmers by 10-month-old Infants

    Brandon M. Woo;Conor M. Steckler;Doan T. Le;J. Kiley Hamlin

  • Context-dependent social evaluation in 4.5-month-old human infants: the role of domain-general versus domain-specific processes in the development of social evaluation

    Unknown

  • The case for social evaluation in preverbal infants: gazing toward one’s goal drives infants’ preferences for Helpers over Hinderers in the hill paradigm

    Unknown

  • Out, Damned Spot: Can the “Macbeth Effect” Be Replicated?

    Brian D. Earp;Jim A. C. Everett;Elizabeth N. Madva;J. Kiley Hamlin

  • Foundations of infants' social group evaluations

    Anthea Pun;Matar Ferera;Gil Diesendruck;J. Kiley Hamlin

  • The Origins of Human Morality: Complex Socio-moral Evaluations by Preverbal Infants

    J. Kiley Hamlin

  • Building a Collaborative Psychological Science: Lessons Learned From ManyBabies 1

    Krista Byers-Heinlein;Christina Bergmann;Catherine Davies;Michael C. Frank

  • The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model

    J. Kiley Hamlin;Noah Goodman;Tomer David Ullman;Joshua B Tenenbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen Wynn
Karen Wynn Yale University
Casey Lew-Williams
Casey Lew-Williams Princeton University
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University
Krista Byers-Heinlein
Krista Byers-Heinlein Concordia University
Lara B. Aknin
Lara B. Aknin Simon Fraser University
Paul Bloom
Paul Bloom Columbia University
Jessica A. Sommerville
Jessica A. Sommerville University of Toronto
Leher Singh
Leher Singh University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Sandra R. Waxman
Sandra R. Waxman Northwestern University
Linda Polka
Linda Polka McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens doors to many rewarding pathways. For those interested in therapy and helping families, pursuing an online degree in marriage and family therapy (MFT) is a strong option. However, requirements may differ based on your location. For instance, exploring how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Francisco can provide valuable insight into regional expectations.

Each city often has its own set of educational and certification guidelines. Learn more about the San Jose mft education requirements or discover what’s needed by reviewing the Santa Ana mft education requirements. Similarly, understanding Scottsdale mft certification requirements can help you make informed decisions about where and how to launch your therapy career.

Online degrees are increasingly accessible, letting you tailor your studies to your aspirations and location. Careful research and planning ensure you’re ready to meet local licensing standards and succeed in this impactful field.

Best Scientists Citing J. Kiley Hamlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles