World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7127 6643 3855 3502 106 11932

L. A. Witt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by L. A. Witt between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. L. A. Witt published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1992. 2 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1992. 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1988 2025

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
L. A. Witt: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 3
1989 3
1990 7
1991 6
1992 10
1993 4
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 0
2000 4
2001 5
2002 8
2003 6
2004 4
2005 2
2006 4
2007 1
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 3
2012 5
2013 7
2014 3
2015 5
2016 0
2017 2
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 2
Total 110
Download as CSV

L. A. Witt publications per year - data summary

  • L. A. Witt, a Psychology scholar from University of Houston, has 110 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 1992, with 10 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1995, 2007, 2009 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1996, 1997, 1999, 2016 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.4 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 4 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 41 publications (3.2 per year); 2001-2013: 52 publications (4.0 per year); 2014-2025: 17 publications (1.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

L. A. Witt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. A. Witt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 106
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

L. A. Witt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • L. A. Witt, a Psychology scholar from University of Houston, records 106 publications - the 24th percentile of the discipline.
  • 24% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than L. A. Witt, and about 76% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and L. A. Witt ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

L. A. Witt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where L. A. Witt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

L. A. Witt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • L. A. Witt, a Psychology scholar from University of Houston, records 43 D-Index - the 38th percentile of the discipline.
  • 38% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than L. A. Witt, and about 62% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and L. A. Witt ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

L. A. Witt is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their recent research contributions span several areas within psychology and organizational studies, focusing on moral, social, and emotional aspects of behavior in workplace and leadership contexts.

The scientist's recent published papers include:

  • Equipping soldiers to benefit from goal-focused leadership: The moderating effects of non-discriminatory leader behaviors and workgroup cohesion, 2021, Military Psychology
  • Enhancing engagement in workplace belonging efforts: Why moral processes matter, 2025, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • IOP volume 14 issue 3 Cover and Front matter, 2021, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Rethinking The Modern Workspace - Healthy Workers and Expanded Realities, 2023, Academy of Management Proceedings

Frequent co-authors collaborating with L. A. Witt are:

  • Lars U. Johnson
  • Dustin Maneethai
  • Leanne Atwater
  • Sara Jansen Perry
  • Daniel P. McDonald

Their work has been published primarily in the following venues:

  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Military Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings

L. A. Witt's research intersects multiple subfields including:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Best Publications

  • Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance.

    Amy E. Colbert;Michael K. Mount;James K. Harter;L. A. Witt

  • Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization

    Emily M. Hunter;Mitchell J. Neubert;Sara Jansen Perry;L.A. Witt

  • The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance.

    L. A. Witt;Lisa A. Burke;Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary.

    Gerald R. Ferris;L. A. Witt;Wayne A. Hochwarter

  • The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings

    K. Michele Kacmar;L. A. Witt;Suzanne Zivnuska;Stanley Morris Gully

  • The Role of Participation in Decision-Making in the Organizational Politics-Job Satisfaction Relationship

    L. A. Witt;Martha C. Andrews;K. Michele Kacmar

  • Gender and the relationship between perceived fairness of pay or promotion and job satisfaction.

    L A Witt;L G Nye

  • The work-family interface and job performance: moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support.

    L. A. Witt;Dawn S. Carlson

  • The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance.

    Wayne A. Hochwarter;L. A. Witt;Darren C. Treadway;Gerald R. Ferris

  • Enhancing organizational goal congruence: A solution to organizational politics.

    L. A. Witt

  • Social skill as moderator of the conscientiousness-performance relationship: convergent results across four studies.

    L. A. Witt;Gerald R. Ferris

  • An examination of the curvilinear relationship between leader–member exchange and intent to turnover

    Kenneth J. Harris;K. Michele Kacmar;L. A. Witt

  • Perceptions of organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance.

    W A Hochwarter;L A Witt;K M Kacmar

  • A review of personality and performance: Identifying boundaries, contingencies, and future research directions

    Lisa M. Penney;Emily David;L.A. Witt

  • Interactive effects of personality and organizational politics on contextual performance

    L. A. Witt;K. Michele Kacmar;Dawn S. Carlson;Suzanne Zivnuska

  • When Conscientiousness Isn’t Enough: Emotional Exhaustion and Performance Among Call Center Customer Service Representatives

    L. A. Witt;Martha C. Andrews;Dawn S. Carlson

  • Dimensionality and Construct Validity of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale (Pops)

    Lendell G. Nye;L. A. Witt

  • Interactive effects of impression management and organizational politics on job performance

    Suzanne Zivnuska;K. Michele Kacmar;L. A. Witt;Dawn S. Carlson

  • Incremental Validity of Empirically Keyed Biodata Scales over GMA and the Five Factor Personality Constructs

    Michael K. Mount;L. A. Witt;Murray R. Barrick

  • The role of age in the perceptions of politics--job performance relationship: a three-study constructive replication.

    Darren C. Treadway;Gerald R. Ferris;Wayne Hochwarter;Pamela Perrewé

  • RESEARCH REPORTS The Interactive Effects of Conscientiousness and Agreeableness on Job Performance

    L. A. Witt;Lisa A. Burke;Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne A. Hochwarter
Wayne A. Hochwarter Florida State University
K. Michele Kacmar
K. Michele Kacmar Texas State University
Dawn S. Carlson
Dawn S. Carlson Baylor University
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
Murray R. Barrick
Murray R. Barrick Texas A&M University
Michael K. Mount
Michael K. Mount University of Iowa
Darren C. Treadway
Darren C. Treadway University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Paul E. Spector
Paul E. Spector University of South Florida
Pamela L. Perrewé
Pamela L. Perrewé Florida State University
Kenneth J. Harris
Kenneth J. Harris Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to numerous career options beyond traditional roles. One popular pathway is speech-language pathology, which combines elements of psychology, healthcare, and education. These professionals diagnose and treat communication disorders, making a positive impact in patients’ lives.

Requirements for becoming a speech-language pathologist can vary by state. For instance, aspiring professionals should understand the Montana speech pathologist certification requirements and how they differ from the Nebraska speech pathologist certification requirements. States like Nevada have their own unique steps outlined for becoming a speech therapist in Nevada, while New Hampshire maintains distinct New Hampshire speech pathologist certification requirements.

Psychology students interested in speech-language pathology can now pursue related online degrees, making these career pathways more accessible than ever. Researching the specific certification criteria for each state is crucial to setting yourself up for success in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing L. A. Witt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles