World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
43543
World Ranking
7059
National Ranking
3811

Michael K. Mount publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Mount sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael K. Mount D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Mount sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael K. Mount is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research contributions span several fields including Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Health Professions.

The subfields of study relevant to their work include Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies, and General Health Professions.

Their main topics of research cover:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Workplace Health and Well-being

Michael K. Mount has published in notable academic venues, with publications appearing in the Academy of Management Review.

Their recent paper is titled "Reflections on the 2023 AMR Decade Award: Revisions and Extensions of the Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior," published in 2024 in the Academy of Management Review.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michael K. Mount include:

  • Murray R. Barrick
  • Ning Li

Best Publications

  • THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Timothy A. Judge

  • Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis.

    Timothy A. Judge;Daniel Heller;Michael K. Mount

  • Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness.

    Murray R. Barrick;Greg L. Stewart;Mitchell J. Neubert;Michael K. Mount

  • Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance.

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • Five-Factor Model of personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal Interactions

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick;Greg L. Stewart

  • Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting.

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Judy P. Strauss

  • RELATIONSHIP OF PERSONALITY TRAITS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE WORK BEHAVIORS: THE MEDIATING EFFECTS OF JOB SATISFACTION

    Michael Mount;Remus Ilies;Erin Johnson

  • The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Ning Li

  • Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance.

    Amy E. Colbert;Michael K. Mount;James K. Harter;L. A. Witt

  • EMPLOYER SUPPORTED CHILD CARE, WORK/ FAMILY CONFLICT, AND ABSENTEEISM: A FIELD STUDY

    Stephen J. Goff;Michael K. Mount;Rosemary L. Jamison

  • META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FIVE‐FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND HOLLAND'S OCCUPATIONAL TYPES

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Rashmi Gupta

  • The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance.

    L. A. Witt;Lisa A. Burke;Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick;Steve M. Scullen;James Rounds

  • Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors.

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick;J. Perkins Strauss

  • Understanding the Latent Structure of Job Performance Ratings

    Steven E. Scullen;Michael K. Mount;Maynard Goff

  • Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationships between personality traits and performance.

    Murray R. Barrick;Laura Parks;Michael K. Mount

  • Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: a meta-analysis

    In-Sue Oh;Gang Wang;Michael K. Mount

  • FIVE REASONS WHY THE “BIG FIVE” ARTICLE HAS BEEN FREQUENTLY CITED

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray R. Barrick
Murray R. Barrick Texas A&M University
In-Sue Oh
In-Sue Oh Temple University
Timothy A. Judge
Timothy A. Judge The Ohio State University
Frank L. Schmidt
Frank L. Schmidt University of Iowa
L. A. Witt
L. A. Witt University of Houston
Remus Ilies
Remus Ilies National University of Singapore
Greg L. Stewart
Greg L. Stewart University of Iowa
Deniz S. Ones
Deniz S. Ones University of Minnesota
John E. Hunter
John E. Hunter Michigan State University
James Rounds
James Rounds University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a variety of related career paths, especially in fields like counseling, behavioral analysis, or social work. Social work, in particular, is a popular and rewarding career option for psychology graduates seeking to help individuals, families, and communities.

Affordability is often a top concern for students considering further education. Fortunately, there are many budget-friendly options. For example, you can find affordable social work degrees in California, or explore affordable social work programs in Chicago for in-demand urban opportunities.

If you're based in the Midwest, the most affordable social work degree programs in Columbus can be a great fit for your goals. Meanwhile, those in Texas may want to look at the cheapest social work degrees in Denton for quality education at a lower cost.

By choosing an affordable program, students can enter the workforce with valuable skills and less debt—ready for diverse roles in mental health, education, or community advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Michael K. Mount

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles