World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2757 2524 1587 1418 174 33734

Chockalingam Viswesvaran publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chockalingam Viswesvaran between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chockalingam Viswesvaran published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2007. 7 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2007. 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 6 publications
1992 2025

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chockalingam Viswesvaran: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 4
1993 6
1994 2
1995 3
1996 4
1997 3
1998 10
1999 3
2000 7
2001 7
2002 11
2003 7
2004 5
2005 10
2006 6
2007 12
2008 6
2009 3
2010 9
2011 4
2012 6
2013 8
2014 7
2015 0
2016 4
2017 11
2018 7
2019 2
2020 2
2021 4
2022 3
2023 4
2024 1
2025 6
Total 187
Download as CSV

Chockalingam Viswesvaran publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chockalingam Viswesvaran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 174
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Chockalingam Viswesvaran D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chockalingam Viswesvaran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Chockalingam Viswesvaran is affiliated with Florida International University in the United States and specializes in research spanning Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Psychology. Their scholarly work often addresses Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, and Clinical Psychology, among other subfields.

Their research prominently covers topics such as Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Personality Traits and Psychology, Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout, Workplace Health and Well-being, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Employer Branding and e-HRM.

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Anxiety, job satisfaction, supervisor support and turnover intentions of mid-career nurses: A structural equation model analysis" (2020) published in Journal of Nursing Management
  • "Reducing turnover intentions among first-year nurses: The importance of work centrality and coworker support" (2023) published in Health Services Management Research
  • "How Contextual Performance Influences Perceptions of Personality and Leadership Potential" (2021) published in Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • "Therapeutic alliance in psychosocial interventions for youth internalizing disorders: A systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis." (2021) published in Clinical Psychology Science and Practice
  • "A response to speculations about concurrent validities in selection: Implications for cognitive ability" (2023) published in Industrial and Organizational Psychology

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Jessica Mesmer-Magnus, Satish P. Deshpande, Deniz S. Öneş, Archana Manapragada Tedone, and Martha C. Andrews.

Their work appears regularly in venues such as Academy of Management Proceedings, The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Nursing Management, Health Services Management Research, and Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

Viswesvaran was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • The Role of Social Support in the Process of Work Stress: A Meta-Analysis

    Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Juan I. Sanchez;Jeffrey Fisher

  • Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance.

    Deniz S. Ones;Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Frank L. Schmidt

  • Emotional intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net

    David L Van Rooy;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • The construct of work commitment: testing an integrative framework.

    Amy Cooper-Hakim;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.

    Deniz S. Ones;Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Angelika D. Reiss

  • Perspectives on Models of Job Performance

    Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Deniz S. Ones

  • Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation

    Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings

    Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Deniz S. Ones;Frank L. Schmidt

  • Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling

    Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Deniz S. Ones

  • The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: a meta-analysis

    James J. Connolly;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Phobic and Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents

    Wendy K. Silverman;Armando A. Pina;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination.

    Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT IN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS

    Deniz S. Ones;Stephan Dilchert;Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Timothy A. Judge

  • Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology

    Neil Anderson;Deniz S Ones;Handan Kepir Sinangil;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection

    Deniz S. Ones;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement

    Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Deniz S. Ones

  • Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs

    Jeffrey P. Thomas;Daniel S. Whitman;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences.

    Chockalingam Viswesvaran;Frank L. Schmidt;Deniz S. Ones

  • A meta‐analysis of positive humor in the workplace

    Jessica Mesmer‐Magnus;David J. Glew;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • SATISFACTION, CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS, AND PERFORMANCE IN WORK UNITS: A META‐ANALYSIS OF COLLECTIVE CONSTRUCT RELATIONS

    Daniel S. Whitman;David L. Van Rooy;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

Frequent Co-Authors

Deniz S. Ones
Deniz S. Ones University of Minnesota
Frank L. Schmidt
Frank L. Schmidt University of Iowa
Juan I. Sanchez
Juan I. Sanchez Florida International University
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson University of Bradford
Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela
Murray R. Barrick
Murray R. Barrick Texas A&M University
Armando Pina
Armando Pina Arizona State University
Jeremy W. Pettit
Jeremy W. Pettit Florida International University
Ute-Christine Klehe
Ute-Christine Klehe University of Giessen
Timothy A. Judge
Timothy A. Judge The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to numerous online degrees and specialized career paths. One rewarding route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which is in high demand nationwide. Many students pursue online graduate programs in psychology, applied behavior analysis, or education as a first step toward this credential.

The requirements for BCBA certification can differ by state and city, so it’s important to understand local standards. For example, you can review the Boise bcba education requirements if you are considering practice in Idaho. Those interested in the Boston area should look at the Boston bcba education requirements for more details on the Massachusetts path.

If you plan to work in New York, be sure to review the Buffalo bcba requirements, which highlight specific local considerations. In Arizona, check the Chandler bcba requirements for guidelines in that area.

By researching these options, you can choose the right online degree and set your career trajectory within the versatile field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Chockalingam Viswesvaran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles