World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
50989
World Ranking
4090
National Ranking
2287

Murray R. Barrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murray R. Barrick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Murray R. Barrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Murray R. Barrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Murray R. Barrick is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a focus on Strategy and Management as well as Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. The work spans topics such as Innovation and Knowledge Management, Management and Organizational Studies, Business Strategy and Innovation, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Gender Diversity and Inequality, and Workplace Health and Well-being.

The scientist's recent publications include the following:

  • "Take it from the Top: How Intensity of TMT Joint Problem Solving and Levels of Interdependence Influence Quality of Strategy Implementation Coordination and Firm Performance" (2022), published in Journal of Management Studies
  • "Reflections on the 2023 AMR Decade Award: Revisions and Extensions of the Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior" (2024), published in Academy of Management Review
  • "Acknowledgment of Ad Hoc Reviewers" (2020), published in Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "Person-Environment Fit: New Conceptualizations and the Role in Recruiting and Job Search" (2022), published in Academy of Management Proceedings
  • "Insights from Fit Research on Navigating the Great Resignation" (2022), published in Academy of Management Proceedings

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Murray R. Barrick include:

  • David W. Sullivan
  • Brian W. Swider
  • Kristina Tirol-Carmody
  • Christina Li
  • Sal Mistry

The scientist's work frequently appears in the following publication venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Academy of Management Review
  • Journal of Applied Psychology

Murray R. Barrick has been recognized as a Dean of Fellow at the Academy of Management.

Best Publications

  • THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Timothy A. Judge

  • THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS, GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY, AND CAREER SUCCESS ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN

    Timothy A. Judge;Chad A. Higgins;Carl J. Thoresen;Murray R. Barrick

  • Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness.

    Murray R. Barrick;Greg L. Stewart;Mitchell J. Neubert;Michael K. Mount

  • Human Resource Selection

    Robert D. Gatewood;Hubert S. Feild;Murray R. Barrick

  • Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance.

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • Five-Factor Model of personality and Performance in Jobs Involving Interpersonal Interactions

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick;Greg L. Stewart

  • Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting.

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Judy P. Strauss

  • Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives.

    Murray R. Barrick;Greg L. Stewart;Mike Piotrowski

  • Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type

    Greg L. Stewart;Murray R. Barrick

  • The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Ning Li

  • Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs.

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • Yes, Personality Matters: Moving on to More Important Matters

    Murray R. Barrick

  • Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance.

    Amy E. Colbert;Michael K. Mount;James K. Harter;L. A. Witt

  • Collective organizational engagement: : Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance

    Murray R. Barrick;Gary R. Thurgood;Troy A. Smith;Stephen H. Courtright

  • META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FIVE‐FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND HOLLAND'S OCCUPATIONAL TYPES

    Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount;Rashmi Gupta

  • The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance.

    L. A. Witt;Lisa A. Burke;Murray R. Barrick;Michael K. Mount

  • HIGHER‐ORDER DIMENSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND THE BIG SIX VOCATIONAL INTEREST TYPES

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick;Steve M. Scullen;James Rounds

  • What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance.

    Murray R. Barrick;Jonathan A. Shaffer;Sandra W. DeGrassi

  • Validity of observer ratings of the big five personality factors.

    Michael K. Mount;Murray R. Barrick;J. Perkins Strauss

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael K. Mount
Michael K. Mount University of Iowa
Greg L. Stewart
Greg L. Stewart University of Iowa
Amy L. Kristof-Brown
Amy L. Kristof-Brown University of Iowa
L. A. Witt
L. A. Witt University of Houston
Deniz S. Ones
Deniz S. Ones University of Minnesota
Timothy A. Judge
Timothy A. Judge The Ohio State University
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Hubert S. Feild
Hubert S. Feild Auburn University
Chockalingam Viswesvaran
Chockalingam Viswesvaran Florida International University
James Rounds
James Rounds University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens a range of career pathways—many of which center on addressing today’s most pressing mental health challenges. One rapidly growing field is substance abuse counseling, which requires specialized training and, often, state-specific licensure.

For those interested in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Oakland, you’ll need to meet educational, certification, and supervised training requirements. Each location has unique policies, as seen when comparing becoming a substance abuse counselor in Oklahoma City or becoming a substance abuse counselor in Omaha.

Most entry-level positions require at least a bachelor’s degree in psychology, counseling, or a related field, and may also require state licensure or certification. For example, Orlando substance abuse counselors education requirements include specific coursework and practical experience.

Online psychology degrees are a flexible way to build foundational knowledge and fulfill some prerequisites for these rewarding roles. By understanding your state’s requirements and choosing a relevant online program, you can launch a fulfilling career helping others overcome addiction and improve mental well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Murray R. Barrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles