World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
13323
World Ranking
6548
National Ranking
3554

In-Sue Oh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where In-Sue Oh sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

In-Sue Oh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where In-Sue Oh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

In-Sue Oh is affiliated with Temple University in the United States and has a research focus centered on Business, Management and Accounting, with a significant emphasis on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Their academic contributions span several interdisciplinary subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's research topics predominantly cover areas such as Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Personality Traits and Psychology, Medical Education and Admissions, Emotional Intelligence and Performance, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Mental Health Research Topics, and Gender Diversity and Inequality.

In-Sue Oh has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Organizational Behavior

Recent papers authored or co-authored by In-Sue Oh highlight the breadth of their research interests and include the following:

  • A Meta-Analysis Integrating 25 Years of Diversity Climate Research, 2020, Journal of Management
  • A meta-analysis integrating 20 years of workplace incivility research: Antecedents, consequences, and boundary conditions, 2021, Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • Meta-analytic five-factor model personality intercorrelations: Eeny, meeny, miney, moe, how, which, why, and where to go., 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Happy to help, happy to change? A meta-analysis of major predictors of affiliative and change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • A multirater perspective on personality and performance: An empirical examination of the trait-reputation-identity model., 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology

Collaborative work is notable in their career, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Huy Le
  • Philip L. Roth
  • Dishi Hu
  • Joo Hun Han
  • Soojung Han

Best Publications

  • Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research:

    Gang Wang;In-Sue Oh;Stephen H. Courtright;Amy E. Colbert

  • The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis.

    Dan S. Chiaburu;In-Sue Oh;Christopher M. Berry;Ning Li

  • Fixed‐ versus random‐effects models in meta‐analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results

    Frank L. Schmidt;In-Sue Oh;Theodore L. Hayes

  • Third-year College Retention and Transfer: Effects of Academic Performance, Motivation, and Social Connectedness

    Jeff Allen;Steven B. Robbins;Alex Casillas;In-Sue Oh

  • Too much of a good thing: curvilinear relationships between personality traits and job performance.

    Huy Le;In Sue Oh;Steven B. Robbins;Remus Ilies

  • Antecedents and consequences of employee organizational cynicism: A meta-analysis

    Dan S. Chiaburu;Ann Chunyan Peng;In-Sue Oh;George C. Banks

  • DO CEOS MATTER TO FIRM STRATEGIC ACTIONS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE? A META‐ANALYTIC INVESTIGATION BASED ON UPPER ECHELONS THEORY

    Gang Wang;R. Michael Holmes;In Sue Oh;Weichun Zhu

  • Understanding Managerial Development: Integrating Developmental Assignments, Learning Orientation, and Access to Developmental Opportunities in Predicting Managerial Competencies

    Lisa Dragoni;Paul E. Tesluk;Joyce E. A. Russell;In-Sue Oh

  • Validity of observer ratings of the five-factor model of personality traits: a meta-analysis

    In-Sue Oh;Gang Wang;Michael K. Mount

  • Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: integrated meta-analytic path analyses

    Steven B. Robbins;In Sue Oh;Huy Le;Christopher Button

  • Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture.

    Daejeong Choi;In-Sue Oh;Amy E Colbert

  • INCREASED ACCURACY FOR RANGE RESTRICTION CORRECTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ROLE OF PERSONALITY AND GENERAL MENTAL ABILITY IN JOB AND TRAINING PERFORMANCE

    Frank L. Schmidt;Jonathan A. Shaffer;In-Sue Oh

  • Fit Happens Globally: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of the Relationships of Person–Environment Fit Dimensions with Work Attitudes and Performance Across East Asia, Europe, and North America

    In Sue Oh;Russell P. Guay;Kwanghyun Kim;Crystal M. Harold

  • DEVELOPING EXECUTIVE LEADERS: THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF COGNITIVE ABILITY, PERSONALITY, AND THE ACCUMULATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE IN PREDICTING STRATEGIC THINKING COMPETENCY

    Lisa Dragoni;In-Sue Oh;Paul Vankatwyk;Paul E. Tesluk

  • Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model.

    Rachel E. Frieder;Gang Wang;In-Sue Oh

  • The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings.

    In-Sue Oh;Christopher M. Berry

  • Developing leaders' strategic thinking through global work experience: the moderating role of cultural distance.

    Lisa Dragoni;In-Sue Oh;Paul E. Tesluk;Ozias A. Moore

  • A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance.

    Erik Gonzalez-Mulé;Michael K. Mount;In-Sue Oh

  • The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 100 Years of Research Findings

    Frank L. Schmidt;In‐Sue Oh;Jonathan A. Shaffer

  • The Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits and OrganizationalCitizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis

    Dan S. Chiaburu;In‐Sue Oh;Christopher M. Berry;Ning Li

  • Validity of Observer Ratings of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Traits: A Meta-Analysis

    In‐Sue Oh;Wang Gang;Michael Mount

  • Fit Happens Globally: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of the Relationships of Person-Environment Fit Dimensions with Work Attitudes and Performance Across East Asia, Europe, and North America

    In‐Sue Oh;Russell P. Guay;Kwanghyun Kim;Crystal M. Harold

  • Fixed- Versus Random-Effects Models in Meta-Analysis: Model Properties and an Empirical Comparison of Differences in Results

    In‐Sue Oh;Frank L. Schmidt;Theodore L. Hayes

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank L. Schmidt
Frank L. Schmidt University of Iowa
Michael K. Mount
Michael K. Mount University of Iowa
Chad H. Van Iddekinge
Chad H. Van Iddekinge Florida State University
Philip L. Roth
Philip L. Roth Clemson University
Steven B. Robbins
Steven B. Robbins Virginia Commonwealth University
Paul E. Tesluk
Paul E. Tesluk University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Deniz S. Ones
Deniz S. Ones University of Minnesota
Joyce E. A. Russell
Joyce E. A. Russell University of Maryland, College Park
Michael A. Campion
Michael A. Campion Purdue University West Lafayette
Gary Blau
Gary Blau Temple University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of fulfilling online career pathways. Many students pursue roles as school counselors, which require specialized education and credentials that vary by state. For example, if you are interested in learning how to become a school counselor in Minnesota, you'll need to follow specific coursework and licensing steps.

Different states have unique requirements for school counselors. Those curious about the Mississippi school counselor education requirements will find a focus on relevant graduate degrees and supervised experience. Similarly, if Missouri is your state of interest, be sure to review the Missouri school counselor education requirements, which include distinct certification processes.

Online psychology degree holders often explore diverse opportunities beyond traditional counseling, from research to specialized mental health roles. In Montana, for example, understanding the Montana school counselor education requirements can set the foundation for a rewarding career in educational settings.

No matter your location, pursuing an online psychology degree can provide the flexibility and foundational knowledge needed for multiple career paths within mental health and education.

Best Scientists Citing In-Sue Oh

Trending Scientists