World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
18966
World Ranking
9303
National Ranking
4916

Paul E. Tesluk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Tesluk sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul E. Tesluk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul E. Tesluk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul E. Tesluk is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, and Psychology.

The main areas of focus in their research include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, Workplace Spirituality and Leadership, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Team Dynamics and Performance, and Innovation and Knowledge Management.

Tesluk has contributed multiple papers across different publication venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Shaping positive and negative ties to improve team effectiveness: The roles of leader humility and team helping norms" (2020), published in Human Relations
  • "Leading the team, but feeling dissatisfied: Investigating informal leaders' energetic activation and work satisfaction and the supporting role of formal leadership" (2021), published in Journal of Organizational Behavior
  • "Emergence of shared leadership networks in teams: An adaptive process perspective" (2021), published in The Leadership Quarterly
  • "THE IMPACT OF TEAM EMPOWERMENT ON VIRTUAL TEAM PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION." (2021), published in UNC Libraries

Frequent coauthors of Paul E. Tesluk include:

  • Chia-Yen Chiu
  • Prasad Balkundi
  • Bradley P. Owens
  • Jennifer D. Nahrgang
  • Ashlea Bartram

Publications by Tesluk have appeared in various venues such as Human Relations, Journal of Organizational Behavior, The Leadership Quarterly, and UNC Libraries.

Their work addresses several subfields including Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, and Strategy and Management.

Best Publications

  • Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance

    Jay B. Carson;Paul E. Tesluk;Jennifer A. Marrone

  • A Comparison of Approaches to Forming Composite Measures in Structural Equation Models

    Ronald S. Landis;Daniel J. Beal;Paul E. Tesluk

  • The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction

    Bradley L. Kirkman;Benson Rosen;Paul E. Tesluk;Cristina B. Gibson

  • Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and Retaliation

    Daniel P. Skarlicki;Robert Folger;Paul Tesluk

  • Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc.

    Bradley L. Kirkman;Benson Rosen;Cristina B. Gibson;Paul E. Tesluk

  • A Multilevel Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance

    Narda R. Quigley;Paul E. Tesluk;Edwin A. Locke;Kathryn M. Bartol

  • Toward an integrated model of work experience.

    Paul E. Tesluk;Rick R. Jacobs

  • A Longitudinal Study of Team Conflict, Conflict Management, Cohesion, and Team Effectiveness:

    Amanuel G. Tekleab;Narda R. Quigley;Paul E. Tesluk

  • Influences of Organizational Culture and Climate on Individual Creativity.

    Paul E. Tesluk;James L. Farr;Stephanie R. Klein

  • An examination of crossover and spillover effects of spousal and expatriate cross-cultural adjustment on expatriate outcomes.

    Riki Takeuchi;Seokhwa Yun;Paul E. Tesluk

  • Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis

    Anil K. Gupta;Paul E. Tesluk;M. Susan Taylor

  • AN INTEGRATIVE VIEW OF INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

    Riki Takeuchi;Paul E. Tesluk;Seokhwa Yun;David P. Lepak

  • Top Management Attention to Innovation: The Role of Search Selection and Intensity in New Product Introductions

    Qiang Li;Patrick G. Maggitti;Ken G. Smith;Paul E. Tesluk

  • A Multilevel Investigation of Antecedents and Consequences of Team Member Boundary-Spanning Behavior

    Jennifer A. Marrone;Paul E. Tesluk;Jay B. Carson

  • Understanding Managerial Development: Integrating Developmental Assignments, Learning Orientation, and Access to Developmental Opportunities in Predicting Managerial Competencies

    Lisa Dragoni;Paul E. Tesluk;Joyce E. A. Russell;In-Sue Oh

  • Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability.

    Chia-Yen Chad Chiu;Bradley P Owens;Paul E Tesluk

  • GENERAL SAFETY PERFORMANCE: A TEST OF A GROUNDED THEORETICAL MODEL

    Michael J. Burke;Sue Ann Sarpy;Paul E. Tesluk;Kristin Smith-Crowe

  • Emotional intelligence, teamwork effectiveness, and job performance: The moderating role of job context.

    Crystal I C Chien Farh;Myeong Gu Seo;Paul E. Tesluk

  • Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness.

    Paul E. Tesluk;John E. Mathieu

  • Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance.

    Paul Tesluk;John E. Mathieu;Stephen J. Zaccaro;Michelle Marks

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradley L. Kirkman
Bradley L. Kirkman North Carolina State University
Benson Rosen
Benson Rosen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
In-Sue Oh
In-Sue Oh Temple University
Cristina B. Gibson
Cristina B. Gibson Pepperdine University
Riki Takeuchi
Riki Takeuchi The University of Texas at Dallas
John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
Kathryn M. Bartol
Kathryn M. Bartol University of Maryland, College Park
Ken G. Smith
Ken G. Smith University of Maryland, College Park
Faye S. Taxman
Faye S. Taxman George Mason University
Joyce E. A. Russell
Joyce E. A. Russell University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially in growing allied health fields. One rewarding option is speech-language pathology. This field is in demand and accessible through various online and blended degree programs across the USA.

For those specifically interested in becoming a speech therapist in Maryland, you'll need to follow a series of educational, clinical, and licensure steps aligned with state regulations. Each state has distinct requirements. For example, the Massachusetts speech pathologist certification requirements emphasize both graduate-level education and supervised clinical hours.

Similarly, if you’re exploring how to become a speech language pathologist in Michigan, or researching SLP requirements in Minnesota, you’ll notice every state has its own unique combination of degree prerequisites and supervised practicum obligations.

Many accredited graduate programs now offer flexible online or hybrid options, letting you tailor your study to fit your lifestyle. As you plan your psychology education, researching requirements by state—like how to become a speech language pathologist in Michigan—ensures your chosen pathway aligns with your career goals and local licensing criteria.

Best Scientists Citing Paul E. Tesluk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles