World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
90
Citations
59103
World Ranking
934
National Ranking
590

John E. Mathieu publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Mathieu sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

John E. Mathieu D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Mathieu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Mathieu is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within Business, Management and Accounting, and Psychology, with significant contributions across related subfields such as Social Psychology, Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management Science and Operations Research, and Communication.

The scientist's main research topics cover areas including Team Dynamics and Performance, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Knowledge Management and Sharing, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Occupational Health and Safety Research, and Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management.

John E. Mathieu has published extensively in frequent venues such as Academy of Management Proceedings, Journal of Management, Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Journal, and Behavioral Science & Policy.

Recent papers include the following:

  • Understanding Work Teams From a Network Perspective: A Review and Future Research Directions, 2020, Journal of Management
  • Team Decision Making: The Dynamic Effects of Team Decision Style Composition and Performance via Decision Strategy, 2020, Journal of Management
  • Indexing dynamic collective constructs using computer-aided text analysis: Construct validity evidence and illustrations featuring team processes., 2021, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Deploying Human Capital Resources: Accentuating Effects of Situational Alignment and Social Capital Resources, 2020, Academy of Management Journal
  • Team leader coaching intervention: An investigation of the impact on team processes and performance within a surgical context., 2020, Journal of Applied Psychology

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers, notably:

  • Margaret M. Luciano
  • Scott I. Tannenbaum
  • Mikhail A. Wolfson
  • Elizabeth Klock
  • M. Travis Maynard

Best Publications

  • A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment

    John E. Mathieu;Dennis M. Zajac

  • A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes

    Michelle A. Marks;John E. Mathieu;Stephen J. Zaccaro

  • The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.

    John E. Mathieu;Tonia S. Heffner;Gerald F. Goodwin;Eduardo Salas

  • Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future:

    John Mathieu;M. Travis Maynard;Tammy Rapp;Lucy Gilson

  • Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation

    Scott B. Button;John E. Mathieu;Dennis M. Zajac

  • To Empower or Not to Empower Your Sales Force? An Empirical Examination of the Influence of Leadership Empowerment Behavior on Customer Satisfaction and Performance.

    Michael Ahearne;John Mathieu;Adam Rapp

  • Influences of Individual and Situational Characteristics on Measures of Training Effectiveness

    John E. Mathieu;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas

  • Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges Across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management

    Michael A. Hitt;Paul W. Beamish;Susan E. Jackson;John E. Mathieu

  • A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA

    Jefferey A. LePine;Ronald F. Piccolo;Christine L. Jackson;John E. Mathieu

  • Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior

    John E. Mathieu;Scott R. Taylor

  • Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation.

    Scott I. Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu;Eduardo Salas;Janis A. Cannon-Bowers

  • Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments

    Michelle A. Marks;Stephen J. Zaccaro;John E. Mathieu

  • Further evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction.

    John E. Mathieu;James L. Farr

  • The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality

    Bradley L. Kirkman;John E. Mathieu

  • A Meta-Analysis of Different Forms of Shared Leadership–Team Performance Relations

    Lauren D’Innocenzo;John E. Mathieu;Michael R. Kukenberger

  • Empowerment and team effectiveness: an empirical test of an integrated model.

    John E. Mathieu;Lucy L. Gilson;Thomas M. Ruddy

  • CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS?

    Lucy L. Gilson;John E. Mathieu;Christina E. Shalley;Thomas M. Ruddy

  • INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELF‐EFFICACY: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS

    John E. Mathieu;Jennifer W. Martineau;Scott I. Tannenbaum

  • Empowerment-—Fad or Fab? A Multilevel Review of the Past Two Decades of Research

    M. Travis Maynard;Lucy L. Gilson;John E. Mathieu

  • A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

    John E Mathieu;John R Hollenbeck;Daniel L Van Knippenberg;Daniel Ilgen

  • The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes

    J. Bruce Tracey;Timothy R. Hinkin;Scott Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott I. Tannenbaum
Scott I. Tannenbaum University at Albany, State University of New York
Gilad Chen
Gilad Chen University of Maryland, College Park
Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Benson Rosen
Benson Rosen University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Paul D. Bliese
Paul D. Bliese University of South Carolina
Stephen J. Zaccaro
Stephen J. Zaccaro George Mason University
Paul E. Tesluk
Paul E. Tesluk University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers University of Central Florida
Mark A. Griffin
Mark A. Griffin Curtin University
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to multiple career paths, both in traditional clinical settings and in specialized areas such as applied behavior analysis (ABA). Many students choose online degrees for their flexibility and access to high-quality programs across the country.

One in-demand pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role that requires specialized education and certification. Prospective behavior analysts can discover the step-by-step requirements in various regions, such as learning how to become a bcba in North Las Vegas or exploring the bcba certification requirements in Oakland.

Requirements can differ by state or city, so students should research what is needed to becoming a bcba in Oklahoma City compared to other locations like Omaha. For example, understanding how to become a bcba in Omaha can help tailor your academic choices and internship experiences.

While exploring online psychology degrees, consider how coursework can prepare you for certification exams, internships, and state-specific licensing. Careful planning ensures your education aligns with your chosen career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Mathieu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles