World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
16988
World Ranking
8366
National Ranking
4459

Scott I. Tannenbaum publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott I. Tannenbaum sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Scott I. Tannenbaum D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott I. Tannenbaum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott I. Tannenbaum is affiliated with the University at Albany, State University of New York in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Applied Psychology, Emergency Medical Services, and Social Psychology.

Their work emphasizes topics including Interprofessional Education and Collaboration, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Team Dynamics and Performance, Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare, Innovations in Medical Education, Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation, and Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management.

Recent publications include:

  • Overcoming Challenges to Teamwork in Healthcare: A Team Effectiveness Framework and Evidence-Based Guidance, 2021, Frontiers in Communication
  • Managing teamwork in the face of pandemic: evidence-based tips, 2020, BMJ Quality & Safety
  • Helping healthcare teams save lives during COVID-19: Insights and countermeasures from team science, 2020, American Psychologist
  • Informal (Field-Based) Learning, 2021, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Team FIRST framework: Identifying core teamwork competencies critical to interprofessional healthcare curricula, 2023, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

Frequent coauthors in Tannenbaum's research include:

  • Eduardo Salas
  • John E. Mathieu
  • Philip E. Greilich
  • Elizabeth H. Lazzara
  • Eric J. Thomas

Publications by Tannenbaum commonly appear in venues such as Academy of Management Proceedings, BMJ Quality & Safety, Organizational Dynamics, Diagnosis, and Frontiers in Communication.

This profile reflects a body of work focused on addressing teamwork, collaboration, and communication in healthcare settings, particularly in contexts requiring interprofessional approaches and response to emergent challenges such as pandemics.

Best Publications

  • Toward an understanding of team performance and training.

    Eduardo Salas;Terry L. Dickinson;Sharolyn A. Converse;Scott I. Tannenbaum

  • Training and development in work organizations.

    Scott I. Tannenbaum;Gary Yukl

  • A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA

    George M. Alliger;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Winston Bennett;Holly Traver

  • Applying Trained Skills on the Job: The Importance of the Work Environment

    J. Bruce Tracey;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Michael J. Kavanagh

  • Influences of Individual and Situational Characteristics on Measures of Training Effectiveness

    John E. Mathieu;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas

  • The Science of Training and Development in Organizations What Matters in Practice

    Eduardo Salas;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Kurt Kraiger;Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch

  • Defining Competencies and Establishing Team Training Requirements

    Janis A. Cannon-Bowers;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas;Catherine E. Volpe

  • Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation.

    Scott I. Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu;Eduardo Salas;Janis A. Cannon-Bowers

  • Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments.

    Scott I. Tannenbaum;Rebecca L. Beard;Eduardo Salas

  • Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis:

    Scott I. Tannenbaum;Christopher P. Cerasoli

  • INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SELF‐EFFICACY: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS

    John E. Mathieu;Jennifer W. Martineau;Scott I. Tannenbaum

  • Enhancing continuous learning: Diagnostic findings from multiple companies

    Scott I. Tannenbaum

  • The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes

    J. Bruce Tracey;Timothy R. Hinkin;Scott Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu

  • 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go.

    Bradford S. Bell;Scott I. Tannenbaum;J. Kevin Ford;Raymond A. Noe

  • A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models Moving Toward a Dynamic and Temporal Framework

    John E. Mathieu;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Jamie S. Donsbach;George M. Alliger

  • Teams Are Changing: Are Research and Practice Evolving Fast Enough?

    Scott I. Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu;Eduardo Salas;Debra Cohen

  • Guided Team Self-Correction: Impacts on Team Mental Models, Processes, and Effectiveness

    Kimberly A. Smith-Jentsch;Janis A. Cannon-Bowers;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas

  • What’s in a Name? A Literature-Based Approach to Understanding Mentoring, Coaching, and Other Constructs That Describe Developmental Interactions

    Caroline P. D’Abate;Erik R. Eddy;Scott I. Tannenbaum

  • Toward Theoretically Based Principles of Training Effectiveness: A Model and Initial Empirical Investigation

    Janis A. Cannon-Bowers;Eduardo Salas;Scott I. Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu

  • Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork.

    Christina N. Lacerenza;Shannon L. Marlow;Scott I. Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas

  • Team resilience: How teams flourish under pressure.

    George M. Alliger;Christopher P. Cerasoli;Scott I. Tannenbaum;William B. Vessey

  • Antecedents and Outcomes of Informal Learning Behaviors: a Meta-Analysis

    Christopher P. Cerasoli;George M. Alliger;Jamie S. Donsbach;John E. Mathieu

  • Overcoming Challenges to Teamwork in Healthcare: A Team Effectiveness Framework and Evidence-Based Guidance

    Stephanie Zajac;Amanda Woods;Scott Tannenbaum;Eduardo Salas

  • Helping teams to help themselves: : comparing two team-led debriefing methods

    Erik R. Eddy;Scott I. Tannenbaum;John E. Mathieu

  • Influences of Individual and Situational Characteristics on Measures of Training Effectiveness

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Mathieu
John E. Mathieu University of Connecticut
Eduardo Salas
Eduardo Salas Rice University
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers University of Central Florida
J. Bruce Tracey
J. Bruce Tracey Cornell University
Timothy R. Hinkin
Timothy R. Hinkin Cornell University
Raymond A. Noe
Raymond A. Noe The Ohio State University
J. Kevin Ford
J. Kevin Ford Michigan State University
Steve W. J. Kozlowski
Steve W. J. Kozlowski University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse online programs and impactful career routes, such as substance abuse counseling. This field is in high demand across the United States, with each region having unique licensing and education requirements for counselors.

For instance, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Austin should be aware of specific state certifications and training hours needed. In California, substance abuse counselor requirements in Bakersfield include formal education and supervised practice.

If you are looking at opportunities on the East Coast, Baltimore substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize accredited online degrees and field experience. Similarly, Boise substance abuse counselors education requirements focus on coursework and practical training, which can be fulfilled via remote learning.

Online psychology degrees provide a flexible route into these careers, allowing graduates to meet the educational prerequisites for certification and licensure in various states. Exploring each region's pathway ensures you choose the right program and set yourself up for success as a professional counselor.

Best Scientists Citing Scott I. Tannenbaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles