What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Social psychology
- Marketing
- Industrial and organizational psychology
His scientific interests lie mostly in Training, Social psychology, Medical education, Developmental psychology and Knowledge management.
His Training study often links to related topics such as Self-efficacy.
His Social psychology research includes elements of Cognitive psychology and Training evaluation.
His Medical education study combines topics in areas such as Organizational commitment, Team training, Personality and Aptitude.
In his work, Training and development is strongly intertwined with Training needs, which is a subfield of Developmental psychology.
As part of the same scientific family, Scott I. Tannenbaum usually focuses on Knowledge management, concentrating on Group performance and intersecting with Team effectiveness.
His most cited work include:
- Training and development in work organizations. (772 citations)
- A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA (738 citations)
- Toward an understanding of team performance and training. (721 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Scott I. Tannenbaum mainly focuses on Social psychology, Knowledge management, Training, Applied psychology and Team effectiveness.
His work on Social group as part of general Social psychology study is frequently connected to Meta-analysis, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His research in the fields of Organization development overlaps with other disciplines such as Key issues.
His Training study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Medical education.
His Applied psychology research incorporates themes from Content validity and Training and development.
His research in Team effectiveness intersects with topics in Organizational effectiveness, Group performance, Team composition, Teamwork and Process management.
He most often published in these fields:
- Social psychology (25.42%)
- Knowledge management (23.73%)
- Training (22.03%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Teamwork (15.25%)
- Public relations (6.78%)
- Evidence-based practice (5.08%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Teamwork, Public relations, Evidence-based practice, Applied psychology and Informal learning.
His studies in Teamwork integrate themes in fields like Coaching and Knowledge management.
His Applied psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Sample, Construct and Training and development.
His research integrates issues of Training design, Training and Timeline in his study of Training and development.
His Informal learning study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Experiential learning, Cooperative learning, Active learning and Social psychology.
His Team effectiveness study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Crisis management, Qualitative property, Middle management and Resilience.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. (127 citations)
- Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork. (51 citations)
- Antecedents and Outcomes of Informal Learning Behaviors: a Meta-Analysis (47 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social psychology
- Marketing
- Industrial and organizational psychology
Scott I. Tannenbaum mainly investigates Professional development, Medical education, Debriefing, Evidence-based practice and Teamwork.
The concepts of his Professional development study are interwoven with issues in Timeline, Applied psychology and Employee development.
His research in Training design and Training are components of Medical education.
His work on Debriefing is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Psychological intervention.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
