World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9436 8853 368 356 411 26706

Paul G.H. Mulder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul G.H. Mulder between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul G.H. Mulder published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 9.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 1999. 12 of the 466 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 1999. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 17 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 23 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 31 publications 2000: 26 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 29 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1977 2026

466 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul G.H. Mulder: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 3
1988 5
1989 4
1990 9
1991 6
1992 6
1993 12
1994 5
1995 17
1996 17
1997 23
1998 15
1999 31
2000 26
2001 19
2002 17
2003 24
2004 29
2005 17
2006 24
2007 27
2008 20
2009 21
2010 6
2011 8
2012 5
2013 4
2014 6
2015 3
2016 1
2017 0
2018 2
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 15
2023 11
2024 8
2025 11
2026 1
Total 466
Download as CSV

Paul G.H. Mulder publications per year - data summary

  • Paul G.H. Mulder, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, has 466 publications recorded across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1977 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 1999, with 31 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1977, 1981, 1982, 1984 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 50 years in the span carry no publications at all (1978, 1979, 1980, 1985 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.8 per year counting only the 43 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 46 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1977-1993: 52 publications (3.1 per year); 1994-2010: 338 publications (19.9 per year); 2011-2026: 76 publications (4.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Paul G.H. Mulder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G.H. Mulder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 411 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 411
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul G.H. Mulder publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Paul G.H. Mulder, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 411 publications - the 41st percentile of the discipline.
  • 41% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Paul G.H. Mulder, and about 59% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Paul G.H. Mulder ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Paul G.H. Mulder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G.H. Mulder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Paul G.H. Mulder D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Paul G.H. Mulder, a Medicine scholar from Erasmus University Rotterdam, records 97 D-Index - the 55th percentile of the discipline.
  • 55% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Paul G.H. Mulder, and about 45% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Paul G.H. Mulder ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Paul G.H. Mulder is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans various aspects of medicine, with a significant focus on cardiology, endocrinology, molecular biology, and surgery. They have contributed to fields such as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and have explored topics primarily related to cardiovascular health and systemic disease mechanisms.

The main fields of study in their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broad fields, their research addresses several subfields, such as:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Molecular Biology
  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Key research topics covered by Paul G.H. Mulder consist of:

  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Extracellular Vesicles in Disease
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • Lymphatic and Immune Cell Cross-Talk Regulates Cardiac Recovery After Experimental Myocardial Infarction, 2020, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • Microvascular and Lymphatic Dysfunction in HFpEF and Its Associated Comorbidities, 2020, Basic Research in Cardiology
  • 5/6 Nephrectomy Induces Different Renal, Cardiac and Vascular Consequences in 129/Sv and C57BL/6JRj Mice, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Regulation and Impact of Cardiac Lymphangiogenesis in Pressure-Overload-Induced Heart Failure, 2022, Cardiovascular Research
  • Short-and Long-Term Administration of Imeglimin Counters Cardiorenal Dysfunction in a Rat Model of Metabolic Syndrome, 2020, Endocrinology Diabetes & Metabolism

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Paul G.H. Mulder include:

  • Lionel Nicol
  • Vincent Richard
  • Matthieu Soulié
  • Yohan Stephan
  • Frédéric Jaisser

Their work has been published in various scientific venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements
  • Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Scientific Reports
  • Hypertension
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Best Publications

  • Morphometric analysis of Bruch's membrane, the choriocapillaris, and the choroid in aging.

    R.S. Ramrattan;T.L. van der Schaft;C.M. Mooy;W.C. de Bruijn

  • Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity.

    Kam H Cheng;Siu L Leung;Hans W Hoekman;W Houdijn Beekhuis

  • Effects of environmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins on cognitive abilities in Dutch children at 42 months of age

    Svati Patandin;Caren Lanting;Paul Mulder;Eric Boersma

  • Adult Height after Long-Term, Continuous Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment in Short Children Born Small for Gestational Age: Results of a Randomized, Double- Blind, Dose-Response GH Trial

    Yvonne Van Pareren;Paul Mulder;Mieke Houdijk;Maarten Jansen

  • Azithromycin maintenance treatment in patients with frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COLUMBUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Sevim Uzun;Remco S Djamin;Jan A J W Kluytmans;Paul G H Mulder

  • Efficacy and Safety of Lamotrigine as Add-On Treatment to Lithium in Bipolar Depression: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Marc L. M. van der Loos;Paul G. H. Mulder;Erwin G. Th. M. Hartong;Marc B. J. Blom

  • Growth hormone treatment in children with short stature born small for gestational age: 5-year results of a randomized, double-blind, dose-response trial

    Theo Sas;Wouter de Waal;Paul Mulder;Mieke Houdijk

  • Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the effects of sex and age.

    W A van den Bosch;Ineke Leenders;P Mulder

  • Increased numbers of dendritic cells in the bronchial mucosa of atopic asthmatic patients: downregulation by inhaled corticosteroids

    G. M. Möller;S. E. Overbeek;C. G. Van Helden-Meeuwsen;J. M. W. Van Haarst

  • Proteinuria after renal transplantation affects not only graft survival but also patient survival.

    J. I. Roodnat;P. G. H. Mulder;J. Rischen-Vos;I. C. Van Riemsdijk

  • Strategies for discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine use : Meta-analysis

    Richard C. Oude Voshaar;Jaap E. Couvée;Anton J. L. M. Van Balkom;Paul G. H. Mulder

  • The prognostic value of blood lactate levels relative to that of vital signs in the pre-hospital setting: a pilot study

    Tim C Jansen;Jasper van Bommel;Paul G H Mulder;Johannes H Rommes

  • Effects of Recruitment Maneuver on Atelectasis in Anesthetized Children

    Gerardo Tusman;Stephan H. Böhm;Alejandro Tempra;Fernando Melkun

  • Histologic features of the early stages of age-related macular degeneration. A statistical analysis.

    Theo L. van der Schaft;Cornelia M. Mooy;Wim C. de Bruijn;Frans G. Oron

  • Effects of prenatal PCB and dioxin background exposure on cognitive and motor abilities in Dutch children at school age

    Hestien J.I. Vreugdenhil;Caren I. Lanting;Paul G.H. Mulder;E.Rudy Boersma

  • Antiviral treatment is more effective than smallpox vaccination upon lethal monkeypox virus infection

    Koert J Stittelaar;Johan Neyts;Lieve Naesens;Geert van Amerongen

  • Impact of Influenza on Mortality in Relation to Age and Underlying Disease, 1967–1989

    Marc J W Sprenger;Paul G H Mulder;Walter E P Beyer;Roel Van Strik

  • The management of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults with topical fluticasone propionate

    J. B. Van Der Meer;E. J. Glazenburg;P. G. H. Mulder;H. F. Eggink

  • Upper limb tension tests as tools in the diagnosis of nerve and plexus lesions. Anatomical and biomechanical aspects.

    Gert Jan Kleinrensink;Rob Stoeckart;Paul Mulder;G. V D Hoek

  • Potential Usefulness of Inflammatory Markers to Monitor Respiratory Functional Impairment in Sarcoidosis

    Snježana Rothkrantz-Kos;Marja P. van Dieijen-Visser;Paul G.H. Mulder;Marjolein Drent

Frequent Co-Authors

Henk C. Hoogsteden
Henk C. Hoogsteden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marjolein Drent
Marjolein Drent Maastricht University
Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus
Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Hubert G. M. Niesters
Hubert G. M. Niesters University Medical Center Groningen
Jan Bakker
Jan Bakker New York University
Willem Weimar
Willem Weimar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan A.N. Verhaar
Jan A.N. Verhaar Erasmus University Rotterdam
Herman J. Neijens
Herman J. Neijens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jan Jacobs
Jan Jacobs KU Leuven
John de Wit
John de Wit Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in impacting healthcare without pursuing a traditional MD, several flexible online nursing pathways can help you jumpstart your career. Programs like the shortest online dnp program allow qualified candidates to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time, often with options for part-time or accelerated study.

Additionally, there are innovative options such as a dnp program without clinical hours, which may appeal to experienced nurses seeking more flexibility or non-traditional clinical routes. If you're eager to begin your healthcare journey quickly, consider a 6 month lpn program that prepares you for essential nursing support roles in less than a year.

Those interested in the mental health field can look into the shortest pmhnp program, which trains you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner online in an accelerated format. These online degrees offer accessible and diverse alternatives for fueling a successful medical or nursing career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Paul G.H. Mulder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles