What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Habitat
- Ecosystem
Thomas P. Sullivan mainly investigates Ecology, Species richness, Species diversity, Pinus contorta and Silviculture.
His study in Clearcutting, Habitat, Old-growth forest, Biodiversity and Predator are all subfields of Ecology.
His studies in Clearcutting integrate themes in fields like Spruce-fir forests and Microtus.
The various areas that Thomas P. Sullivan examines in his Species diversity study include Abundance and Forest ecology.
His Pinus contorta study incorporates themes from Forest floor, Thinning and Understory.
His research integrates issues of Shrub, Plant community, Vegetation and Picea engelmannii in his study of Silviculture.
His most cited work include:
- Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores : II. Black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus). (135 citations)
- Influence of variable retention harvests on forest ecosystems. II. Diversity and population dynamics of small mammals (127 citations)
- STAND STRUCTURE AND SMALL MAMMALS IN YOUNG LODGEPOLE PINE FOREST: 10‐YEAR RESULTS AFTER THINNING (108 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Pinus contorta, Abundance, Vole and Species diversity.
His work on Ecology deals in particular with Species richness, Microtus, Habitat, Biodiversity and Deer mouse.
In his research on the topic of Species richness, Plant community, Vegetation and Deciduous is strongly related with Shrub.
His Pinus contorta research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Old-growth forest, Forest ecology, Thinning and Understory.
His Abundance research integrates issues from Northern flying squirrel and Ecosystem.
His research in Vole intersects with topics in Population density, Sorex, Agronomy and Predator.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (79.87%)
- Pinus contorta (30.82%)
- Abundance (29.56%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Ecology (79.87%)
- Abundance (29.56%)
- Pinus contorta (30.82%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Thomas P. Sullivan spends much of his time researching Ecology, Abundance, Pinus contorta, Vole and Species diversity.
Ecology is represented through his Species richness, Microtus, Habitat, Biodiversity and Clearcutting research.
His Species richness research includes themes of Deer mouse, Generalist and specialist species and Forest floor.
Thomas P. Sullivan has included themes like Population growth, Northern flying squirrel and Temperate climate in his Abundance study.
His Pinus contorta study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Forest ecology, Thinning, Agronomy and Understory.
In his work, Plant cover and Picea engelmannii is strongly intertwined with Abies lasiocarpa, which is a subfield of Vole.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- If we build habitat, will they come? Woody debris structures and conservation of forest mammals (45 citations)
- A call for applying trophic structure in ecological restoration (44 citations)
- Stand structure and small mammals in intensively managed forests: Scale, time, and testing extremes (23 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Habitat
- Ecosystem
Thomas P. Sullivan mainly focuses on Ecology, Species diversity, Abundance, Species richness and Biodiversity.
His study in Ecosystem and Plant community is carried out as part of his Ecology studies.
His Species diversity research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Thinning and Pinus contorta.
His Abundance research incorporates elements of Microtus, Vole and Habitat.
As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Species richness, focusing on Forest floor and, on occasion, Silvopasture and Grazing.
His Biodiversity research focuses on Shrub and how it connects with Alpha diversity.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
